General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoan Walsh: GOP’s economic war on women about to explode
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/25/gop%E2%80%99s_economic_war_on_women_about_to_explode/Wednesday, Sep 25, 2013 12:03 PM EST
GOPs economic war on women about to explode
But can feminists put the power of the womens vote behind a populist economic agenda? Theyre about to try
By Joan Walsh
GOPs economic war on women about to explodeEric Cantor, Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz (Credit: AP/Steven Senne/Reuters/Yuri Gripas/AP/J. Scott Applewhite)
snip//
Also 30 years later, though, feminists are still trying to marshal the power of the womens vote behind a populist economic agenda. Lately that movement has taken on new momentum. Last week four powerful progressive groups, not coincidentally led by women the Center for American Progress, Planned Parenthood, the Service Employees International Union and American Women, an affiliate of Emilys List came together behind the Fair Shot campaign, to build support for an agenda that advances womens economic equality. House Democrats have named their economic agenda project When Women Succeed, America Succeeds, labeling that shows a sensitivity to the conservative framing of social progress as a zero-sum game, so that when women succeed, somehow men lose.
snip//
Lets face it: One big issue that impedes feminisms progress is its image as the province of relatively privileged white women, concerned about choice whether to have a child, and if they do, whether to stay home with that child when so many women who arent white and/or privileged have no such choices. They might be unable to choose to afford contraception (until Obamacare) or find or afford an abortion. Or they might very much want a child but be unable to afford that choice too. And as far as staying home, the opt out, lean in and mommy wars debates are so irrelevant as to seem an insult. Mikki Kendall put it best in Salon: The real mommy wars are against women who have no choices.
Thats why the core focus of the latest womens economic agenda organizing appealed to me. Fair Shot makes lots of policy prescriptions theyre here but at an event last week to launch the campaign (full disclosure: I moderated one panel) there was particular energy around the House Democrats womens economic agenda, including Rep. Rosa DeLauros Paycheck Fairness Act, which closes some of the loopholes enabling pay inequities and bills raising the minimum wage, mandating paid sick and family leave and expanding affordable childcare.
Someone else might have expected a grander agenda, but this agenda is both practical, helping many millions of women and its actually sadly ambitious. Lets take paid family leave: The U.S. joined the 20thcentury, sort of, by passing the Family and Medical Leave Act 20 years ago, but it was an unpaid leave. Many of us believed it was a short trip to making it paid thats the way social change happens, we pass important, imperfect legislation, like Social Security and Medicare and, more recently, Obamacare, and then fix its flaws and make it more inclusive and helpful to more people. But we were wrong about family and medical leave (and, so far, about Obamacare.)
snip//
Organizing around womens economic concerns may not lure Republicans or appeal to their conscience, since theyve mostly had Tea Party-provided conscience-ectomies. But it puts feminism on the side of women without enough choices, as well as women who struggle with too many. It holds the promise of narrowing the racial and class gaps within feminism, which are real. I would also argue: It likewise holds the potential to win not just college-educated white women, but working-class white women, to the Democrats agenda. In my family experience working-class white women have felt almost as marginalized by at least the stereotype of white feminism as women of color. (Those who come by feminism via their unions, by the way, have a different perspective.) Still: Its the growing affiliation of African-American and Latino women with the Democratic Party that provides the basis for a real progressive shift on economic issues in the years to come.
Ive never accepted the framing that issues like contraception and abortion are somehow lifestyle issues that only matter to privileged women they may be the most important economic issues, since choosing whether or when to have children is the first requirement of womens autonomy. But I think the effort to integrate issues of health and autonomy with economic issues is worth making. It seems fitting: Fear about the changing role of women helped derail the countrys economic progress 40 years ago. Maybe our recognition of that permanently changed role can get us back on track.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)sheshe2
(83,770 posts)There is a groundswell happening. Be afraid GOP, be very afraid!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)No, gop don't be afraid ... call unskewed polling to confirm your standing!
chervilant
(8,267 posts)looks like Eddie Munster?
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Been reading and providing in the feminist forum for years and not seeing this to be the issue though the article states it is the number one issue. Just crap created because they are not listening
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)And what about this article don't you like? It's shining a light which, imho, is a good thing.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Sounds like Hillary for 2016 Campaign. They are a bit late to the issues.
I wish them well...but, I have reservations. When the "Komen Foundation for Breast Cancer gets onboard"...then I will know for sure...
Sorry...just jaded about this...at this point.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Economists studying third world women have seen that financial aid, such as micro-loans, to women is one of the best ways to better the village as a whole. And women have a much better track record of pay back on those loans.
Villages multiplied equals societies and nations.
Help women and you help the world.
EC
(12,287 posts)is that what anyone else sees? Man it's all over them.
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)EC
(12,287 posts)the picture of the guys she wrote about.
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Post removed
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I thought it was going to catch those personal attacks on other posters
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)compare and contrast the relationship of GOP Women and how the GOP treats women, to ole Joe Stalin and how he treated Jews. (you do know he killed a lot of Jewish People after WW2
Does that help any?
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)to my IL at least a dozen times over the last week, because of posts like this one and the hidden one herein above. So, don't bother to respond, since I've elected to no longer tolerate your consistently derogatory and puerile posts.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)But in the case of these three smug, douchebaggy, prick assholes, nearly any photo, not of the back of the head, would have approximately the same effect.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)Cha
(297,240 posts)Sissyk
(12,665 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)Ive never accepted the framing that issues like contraception and abortion are somehow lifestyle issues that only matter to privileged women they may be the most important economic issues, since choosing whether or when to have children is the first requirement of womens autonomy.
The economic issues commensurate with the oppression of womenare critical, and are key to the ongoing marginalization of women's rights, especially their rights with regards to abortion and contraceptives. Women are STILL paid less than men, and our reproductive rights are being steadily eroded--pushing us back to the era of 'barefoot and pregnant.'
AND, it's almost as ill-perceived to self-identify as a feminist as it is to proclaim atheism. I find this grimly ironic: that which the powerful fear the most, they denigrate the loudest.
Wounded Bear
(58,656 posts)Economic issues and choice are critical to women everywhere.
I look at it a lot like the whole 'Gay Marriage' issue. It's not about women's rights, per se. It's about human rights. If any group is being denied any civil rights, we all are. For the RW, somehow restricting some group's rights is an increase in their own freedom, or at least that is how it seems. It's kind of whacked IMHO.
To me, it all comes together. A woman (or anybody, FTM) can't be truly free without peeling away the fears you talk about.