General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRon Paul sez: More women should sacrifice their careers to homeschool their kids
Last edited Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:10 PM - Edit history (1)
http://blog.sfgate.com/hottopics/2013/09/19/ron-paul-more-women-should-sacrifice-career-to-homeschool-kids/I want people to be able to home-school their children, he said during an appearance on MSNBCs Morning Joe to promote his book about the education titled The School Revolution. Not everybody this is designed to pick out the leaders who want to. And maybe 20 percent might be interested in doing this. But these would be leaders who would be talking about running for Congress and understand why the Federal Reserve is a problem.
BBC anchor Katy Kay this morning asked Paul if his libertarian aim to have so many more children home-taught would hurt women, since theyre the ones typically expected to take on domestic roles. Plus, wouldnt that exact a terrible blow on the workforce to take out a fifth of its working women?...
Paul, by the way, launched his own homeschooling curriculum earlier this year that teaches Biblical principles of self-government, the Austrian school of economics, an understanding of the U.S. Constitution and how its been hijacked and how to run a YouTube channel, among other things. Presumably, theres no favorable mention of the Civil Rights Act, and based on the beliefs of the folks associated with the project, theres probably a lot of talk about Christians taking theocratic dominion over the earth, or at least America. It basically turns your little ones into Pauls intellectual offspring.
Good thing all those Paulbot trolls here went back under the bridge after the 2012 primaries!
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Or is this one of those "you agree with him on Pot laws so you must be a fan" things?
Ron Paul is an ass. But I agree with him on a few issues. Does that make me a fan? Just trying to clarify.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)The Paulbot temperature here has, I'll admit, cooled off considerably in recent months. But we've had some scorchers!
Quantess
(27,630 posts)There are plenty of people, however, who are not fans of the NSA's overreach, and who appreciate Glenn Greenwald and Snowden. That large group of people was maligned as being "Paulbots" without any real basis. Are you talking about those DUers?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)His son the "Rug Doctor" is universally reviled here, as he should be.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Anybody who embraces libertarianism needs to look to Somalia or Liberia as natural outcomes of libertarianism in a capitalist world. This documentary is really fascinating and horrifying: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023697358
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Iggo
(47,558 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)But given who else has been a Libertarian, I no longer see him on the far right fringe of it. I see him as a theocrat and a fascist.
And yes, he is nutz. Even if he made some sense some of the time, the principle of broken clocks applies here, just like his son.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)I don't think anyone here is a 'fan' of his, though.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)It just now occurred to me that the pro-Paul sentiment that used to be quite evident around these parts may well have been fueled by trolls.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The man is a right wing, racist, gay hating Republican. Insulting the DU community with absolutely no basis in truth. Support for Republican candidates is PPR land around here. There is no 'pro Paul sentiment' allowed. There is none held.
Unsupported arch insinuations are an unwelcome tactic.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)leading me to conclude that the Paulbots here were in fact trolls sent by his campaign.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The 'pro Paul wave' is a figment of your imagination. Such crap is not and has never been accepted on DU nor by this community. To say that it has been is both incorrect and insulting.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)And I almost never see Libertarian bullshit here.
But thanks for your concern.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Lots of 'em.
Then after the primaries, they went away. Must have been trolls.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The Fawning all over Paul that some engaged in was disgusting. Shit, Pat Buchanan opposed the war in Iraq, too.
Broken Clocks, and all that.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)What a bunch of stinkbait.
Like chum for amateurs.
Iris
(15,657 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)thank you
demwing
(16,916 posts)does he sey that?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)Ron Paul never said men should drop their career for their kids, and he didn't!
That Ron Paul, he's nothing if he's not consistent!
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I generally choose not to listen!
Zater
(17 posts)I couldn't find it in the OP.
Ohio Joe
(21,756 posts)It is the only logical conclusion I can arrive at from the little fuckers mumblings. What do you get from it?
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)What the POS said.
no_hypocrisy
(46,117 posts)She married a psycho and had five children with him. He wouldn't let her leave their home unless he was with them. He physically, psychologically, and emotionally abused and controlled her. He was very religious but wouldn't let any of the children go to school, even to a private religious school with a scholarship. He insisted that she homeschool the children. She wasn't qualified and didn't have the time, taking care of the home and five children. The closest the kids came to homeschooling was watching "Sesame Street".
Fast Forward. Child Protection removed the children on an unrelated matter but decided the children were educationally neglected as the eight year old couldn't go past the letter "J" in the alphabet. The children were put in a foster family and sent to school. The lack of qualifiable homeschooling was a big deal in trying to prevent my client's parental rights from being terminated and she almost lost her kids because of it.
Epilogue: She divorced her abuser; we prevented her rights from being terminated; her children were returned to her and they live together in another state; the kids are all in school and are in honors programs.
Homeschooling is not the best choice for everyone.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)anything noteworthy?????
When you can line up homeschooled to all the other schooled...and claim they are the inventors/entrepreneurs...then get back to me.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Also, occasional DUer Ava.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ava_Lowery
MrsKirkley
(180 posts)if a child suffers from excessive bullying at school.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Just not with Ron Paul's curriculum.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)as anyone knows who has been robbed by one. Also barbara jordan was a moron.
More Ron Paul "wisdom"
fujiyama
(15,185 posts)If I had kids, I'd be tempted to home school them because school textbooks have been hijacked by the types of idiots that put him in office!
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)fuck Ron Paul. Fuck Rand Paul too.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Please do. That will increase the number of students I get every year that didn't learn anything in the months that they were home schooled. I need more students that I'm supposed to perform miracles for in catching them up to everyone else in less time.
Home schoolers returning to school in my classroom this year so far: 6. And it's only September. At least these 6 are here to start the year.
Paul should sacrifice his political career to teach his own "home schooling curriculum." We could evaluate him, and his curriculum, with one of the new teacher evaluation systems mandated by RTTT and the NCLB waiver. That would be fun.