General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsColor Me WTF??: Rand Paul and Pat Leahy Draft Legislation to Overhaul Fed Sentencing
WASHINGTON (AP) Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul on Wednesday implored Senate colleagues to support a sweeping overhaul of federal sentencing guidelines, saying they disproportionately affect minorities and are reminiscent of Jim Crow laws.
"There is no justice here," said the libertarian and potential 2016 GOP presidential candidate. "It is wrong and it needs to change."
Paul recounted from memory to a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee several cases he said he'd learned about where mandatory minimums had resulted in a miscarriage of justice.
He said one man, Edward Clay, was arrested with less than 2 ounces of cocaine. Even as a first-time offender, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison because of mandatory sentencing guidelines, Paul said.
"Each case should be judged on its own merits," Paul said. "Mandatory minimums prevent this from happening."
http://news.yahoo.com/paul-other-senators-push-sentencing-overhaul-170437858--politics.html
Politics makes for strange bedfellows indeed
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)demagogue.
glowing
(12,233 posts)One should put whatever they want into their bodies ... At the same time, the FDA would be unnecessary since free market would suggest that a company that produces bad product would go out of business (u know, because companies are just so wonderful).
It's all about deregulation. On the other hand in this singular issue, this is a time where I would say its ridiculous for Judges to enforce mandatory drug sentences for different types of substances... It would actually be great if a pot dealer or smoker could just pay a fine and go on their way; where as a dangerous drug cartel who uses violence, should be put away... And perhaps the decriminalization of drugs would help to curtail the cartels and gangs...
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)And in this case, I guess you make partners with whoever agrees with you, for whatever reasons.
glowing
(12,233 posts)Championette
(12 posts)Or do you only condemn DU'ers who agree with Leahy's decision to partner with Paul without condemning Leahy?
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)finds a nut now and again.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Half of the people in federal prison are there for drug law violations. That's a hundred thousand people.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Although I think he just wants to let states enforce their own drug laws. But still.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)if you agree with Rand Paul on anything, in fact if you fail to denounce him at every opportunity, it means you embrace everything he stands for. Same goes for Putin and Matt Damon.
Uncle Joe
(58,424 posts)Thanks for the thread, joeybee.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Peace to you, joeybee.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)otherwise he would shun Rand Paul.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)"Greenwald Derangement Syndrome" - or more commonly known as G.D.S. - is especially prevalent among that crowd. Unfortunately, there is no cure.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)the head of Pat Leahy?