General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTo call the Washington Post a Fish Rap is an insult to Fish---Check their latest POS
The guy could have practiced any religion in the world and it wouldn't have mattered--- He called 911 on his Microwave for fucks sake. I'm heartened that the commenters called the writers and the Post out for obvious troll bullshit.Buddhist assassin at Navy Yard prompts debate about stereotype of peaceful faith
In the aftermath of the Navy Yard shootings, gunman Aaron Alexiss interest in Buddhism seemed at odds with conventional Western stereotypes of blissed-out meditators.
Buddhism scholars and bloggers were quick to note that Alexis spiritual profile didnt fit with the image of someone unloading a gun and killing 12 innocents in a crowded military office building.
Yet some saw a chance to challenge the peaceful stereotype and unveil some topics Buddhists discuss amongst themselves. Is the peaceful Buddhist an illusion? Do Buddhists and Buddhist temples deal directly enough with the topic of mental illness? And in fact might Buddhism in particular attract the mentally ill?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/shooters-interest-in-buddhism-prompts-debate-about-stereotype-of-peaceful-faith/2013/09/18/f0ecd938-1fcf-11e3-94a2-6c66b668ea55_story.html
marmar
(77,091 posts)...... The WaPo isn't fit to line a birdcage.
trumad
(41,692 posts)"Here is the relevant quote from the article that shows the authors are cynically exploiting religion as a way to evoke cheap journalistic sensation:
"The relationship, if any, between Alexis spiritual beliefs and his rampage remains a mystery."
If the authors themselves admit they find "the relationship" between the murders and a religion a "mystery", they should not be writing such a piece of hack journalism."
chervilant
(8,267 posts)is the journalism du jour.
elias49
(4,259 posts)Shame on the Post.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)Here is the text of a comment I just posted to the article:
Further, to pretend that one can even have a meaningful discussion about religious influences or beliefs on a particular individual's actions as if to suggest that there is some direct, cause-and-effect relationship between the two, particularly when the individual in question is clearly seriously mentally ill, is to grossly misunderstand the nature of this kind of mental illness.
Yet more scandalous still is the article's vague attribution of this alleged "debate" to an unnamed "some." The fact that the article fails to identify where, and among whom, this purported 'debate' is occurring makes one wonder what the motivations for writing such a piece were. I will stop short of suggesting that the writers wrote the article because they wanted to foment religious bigotry, but neither the Post nor the writers themselves should be surprised if people interpret it that way..
What an utterly shameful piece of 'journalism.'
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Replace that title with Christian and you have some progressive sites I know of.
Replace it with Muslim and RW sites.
Replace it with 'Gun owner' or 'ccw holder' and you have GD.
All of the above paint the many based on the few. Each group complains about the other using the tactic.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)so a lot of people are rightly giving the WaPo shit...
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)"Welcome to the Amazonification of The Washington Post."