Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:40 PM Sep 2013

Abu Ghraib Torture Victims Ordered To Pay U.S. Contractor’s Legal Fees

By Christina Wilkie,

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered four Iraqis who were imprisoned at the infamous Abu Ghraib prison to pay nearly $14,000 in legal fees to defense contractor CACI, an Arlington, Va.-based company that supplied interrogators to the U.S. government during the Iraq War.

The decision in favor of CACI stemmed from a lawsuit filed by the former prisoners in 2008, alleging that CACI employees directed the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. The suit was dismissed in June, when U.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee ruled that because the alleged acts took place on foreign soil, CACI was “immune from suit” in U.S. court.

Lee did not, however, directly address the question of whether CACI employees took part in the mistreatment of prisoners. The treatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib exploded into an international scandal in 2004, when shocking photos emerged of prisoners being stacked on top of each other, threatened with dogs, and sexually abused.

A little over a month after winning the dismissal this summer, CACI requested that the former prisoners be ordered to pay $15,580 to cover the company’s legal expenses.

more (disturbing torture image at link)

http://www.popularresistance.org/abu-ghraib-torture-victims-ordered-to-pay-u-s-contractors-legal-fees/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Abu Ghraib Torture Victims Ordered To Pay U.S. Contractor’s Legal Fees (Original Post) n2doc Sep 2013 OP
We are just determined to create as many terrorists as is humanly possible. truebluegreen Sep 2013 #1
Sick. And.... Smarmie Doofus Sep 2013 #2
I prefer the term "Mercenaries" Fumesucker Sep 2013 #5
Unreal and sick. nt Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #3
He should have ordered them to apologize to their torturers. jsr Sep 2013 #4
They'll never get it malaise Sep 2013 #6
 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
1. We are just determined to create as many terrorists as is humanly possible.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:44 PM
Sep 2013
Something has to justify our military-industrial-surveillance budgets....
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
2. Sick. And....
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:57 PM
Sep 2013

... getting sicker.

BTW... why do we accept into the language the term "defense contractor". Without even thinking about it.

There's no connection to "defense" involved. If you disagree, kindly consult a dictionary.

There may have been "contract"; but who cares? What difference does it make?

They are actually "war profiteers". They are in place as an entity to make a *profit* from the aftermath of an aggressive war of conquest.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
5. I prefer the term "Mercenaries"
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 08:01 PM
Sep 2013

Let's just say that even Machiavelli had a very dim view of mercenaries.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Abu Ghraib Torture Victim...