Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:27 PM Sep 2013

Summers Withdraws Name for Fed Chairmanship

WASHINGTON— Lawrence Summers, a former U.S. Treasury secretary, called President Barack Obama Sunday to say he is pulling out of the contest to succeed Ben Bernanke as chairman of the Federal Reserve.

"I have reluctantly concluded that any possible confirmation process for me would be acrimonious and would not serve the interest of the Federal Reserve, the Administration or, ultimately, the interests of the nation's ongoing economic recovery," Mr. Summers said in a letter to the president that followed the telephone call.

The move forces Mr. Obama to look to other potential candidates for the Fed job including Janet Yellen, the Fed's vice chairwoman; Donald Kohn, a former vice chairman; and former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Mr. Obama has said that he interviewed the first two. Mr. Geithner has said he isn't interested.

In a statement, Mr. Obama said he accepted Mr. Summers's decision. He described him as "a critical member of my team as we faced down the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and it was in no small part because of his expertise, wisdom, and leadership that we wrestled the economy back to growth and made the kind of progress we are seeing today."


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323981304579077442028100408.html

244 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Summers Withdraws Name for Fed Chairmanship (Original Post) The Straight Story Sep 2013 OP
Fantastic LittleBlue Sep 2013 #1
We are seeing progress? Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #12
Not only as virtually all of the economic gains gone to the wealthiest Americans LittleBlue Sep 2013 #21
I know Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #29
Interest rate swaps are pretty mild derivatives. Lucky Luciano Sep 2013 #72
Anything that causes the Harvard endowment Aerows Sep 2013 #123
Not saying Summers is a good trader. Lucky Luciano Sep 2013 #179
The bond market is going to soar knowing he's out of the running Aerows Sep 2013 #183
I have nothing particularly good to say about Summers. Lucky Luciano Sep 2013 #186
He's a destructive economist Aerows Sep 2013 #187
I see the 10 yr better by 2.5 bps. With SPX up 1%. Lucky Luciano Sep 2013 #189
No Brainer. n/t Aerows Sep 2013 #193
I stand corrected on market impacts of summers' exit. Lucky Luciano Sep 2013 #210
Hey Lucky.. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #202
Hey DG! Lucky Luciano Sep 2013 #242
Why doesn't the President recognize this? Enthusiast Sep 2013 #104
It isn't going to help reducing the value of bonds Aerows Sep 2013 #185
Maybe thats where we come in... Left Coast2020 Sep 2013 #195
I know, Phlem Sep 2013 #59
I think we have differing definitions Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #205
No, we're thinking the same thing Phlem Sep 2013 #236
Romney got a raise. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #68
Romney is more of a stock man Aerows Sep 2013 #184
Here's the thing. One of the ways the government pays for things is by issuing bonds.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #191
What else is new? Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #206
Romney was great at one thing.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #211
Amen to that Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #234
Yeah, it's improving. progressoid Sep 2013 #99
I hope they burn in hell Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #207
I was out of work for almost six months in 2009 because of the recession, cheapdate Sep 2013 #125
Get used to them. As capitalism spirals downward......... socialist_n_TN Sep 2013 #133
I'm glad things are improving for you Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #208
You are not looking up high enough the 1% are doing great! Heather MC Sep 2013 #167
There you go! Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #209
I know...I nearly choked on my morning tea when I read that part in the OP. deutsey Sep 2013 #200
Oh yeah Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #204
It exposes the true sentiments of the President. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #103
I was SO SURE that this was the Onion... CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #2
Me, too! Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #15
Me too. DURHAM D Sep 2013 #38
I thought so as well. WHOOHOO! nt antigop Sep 2013 #40
Me too. I also had to check to make sure. Sounded too good to be true!!! OregonBlue Sep 2013 #50
Same here Katashi_itto Sep 2013 #94
Good. LiberalAndProud Sep 2013 #3
Afterwards followed by Summers immediately reestablishing his lucrative ties to Citi n/t brentspeak Sep 2013 #4
good. he should have done that much sooner. xchrom Sep 2013 #5
Yes!!! n/t KelleyD Sep 2013 #6
He actually did something I agree with! arcane1 Sep 2013 #7
Haha, great reply - nt lyonn Sep 2013 #49
BACKFLIPS !!!! marmar Sep 2013 #8
Yes!!!!!!!!!!! Autumn Sep 2013 #9
Fan fucking tastic! morningfog Sep 2013 #10
Let's hope Obama doesn't just jump from Summers to Geithner. liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #11
He tried Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #13
Geithner has already bowed out. eom tiredtoo Sep 2013 #102
I know Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #108
Geithner is ok. roamer65 Sep 2013 #69
"They delivered the needed liquidity to stabilize the situation". .....for the banks Vanje Sep 2013 #81
I understand... roamer65 Sep 2013 #93
The bailouts should have been conditional. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #107
"The bailouts should have been conditional."......... socialist_n_TN Sep 2013 #136
how about the banks and their fucking derivatives? What has your team of experts done rhett o rick Sep 2013 #178
We need a economist with some sense at the Helm Cryptoad Sep 2013 #110
Holly smokes. They saved the banks. We are still screwed. You rhett o rick Sep 2013 #177
Geithner has already said NO, so no risk there. Mass Sep 2013 #117
Maybe...maybe not. roamer65 Sep 2013 #150
If I had to make a choice between the two give me Geithner. PragmaticLiberal Sep 2013 #190
Excellent gopiscrap Sep 2013 #14
this is good news irisblue Sep 2013 #16
Yayyyy! Vanje Sep 2013 #17
Public pressure DOES work. Great news! n/t Melinda Sep 2013 #18
+1 woo me with science Sep 2013 #19
Sometimes, and this could be one of them. tomg Sep 2013 #26
The 99 percent is finding its voice. woo me with science Sep 2013 #20
People are waking up. Isn't it great? liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #23
It is BelgianMadCow Sep 2013 #37
First Syria, now this... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #112
I think the Democrats are finally hearing us heaven05 Sep 2013 #148
Best news I've heard all day Aerows Sep 2013 #22
From your keyboard to God's gaze. nt Vanje Sep 2013 #30
One can only hope!! Aerows Sep 2013 #36
Seriously, what was Obama thinking? Glad he knows when to back down...so far. dkf Sep 2013 #44
I don't know Aerows Sep 2013 #80
I think Summers backed down--he didn't want to have to deal w/Warren at hearings. nt MADem Sep 2013 #124
That would have been epic. Aerows Sep 2013 #129
Geithner is running the selection process. roamer65 Sep 2013 #160
Summers may have just backed off of his own accord--after all, Geithner wouldn't have MADem Sep 2013 #192
Crosspost Pimpin my grrrl: Janet Yellin Vanje Sep 2013 #24
I hope for her, too Aerows Sep 2013 #111
Yellen is the new favorite. nt MADem Sep 2013 #126
I am quite pleasantly shocked nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #25
Whew. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #27
Good. No further comment required. ewagner Sep 2013 #28
Oh Thank God! I wont have to foment revolution ....this week, any way Vanje Sep 2013 #31
Well, don't put down the Marx just yet....... socialist_n_TN Sep 2013 #138
Great news! ljm2002 Sep 2013 #32
Great News! Now I've gotta check out Donald Kohn! KoKo Sep 2013 #33
Well, that worked out well for everyone. Baitball Blogger Sep 2013 #34
Thank you Larry DJ13 Sep 2013 #35
whewww... whttevrr Sep 2013 #39
Interesting. quakerboy Sep 2013 #41
Article says Yellen or Donald Kohn. Here's Kohn's Bio: KoKo Sep 2013 #46
also served as a key adviser to former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan Oilwellian Sep 2013 #82
That should disqualify him immediately. roamer65 Sep 2013 #115
First thought Aerows Sep 2013 #120
Oh God, no Aerows Sep 2013 #121
Yep...bothered me, too. At least he's not from Harvard...that's the plus KoKo Sep 2013 #127
I think Yellen is a good choice Aerows Sep 2013 #132
So another neo-liberal Freidmanite?........ socialist_n_TN Sep 2013 #142
True...lie down with dogs or cats in the wild...and one Ends up with Fleas..... KoKo Sep 2013 #145
Janet Yellin Vanje Sep 2013 #47
And there you have it. BumRushDaShow Sep 2013 #42
This news made my day!! lyonn Sep 2013 #43
so another poutrage bites the dust... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #45
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #51
waah somebody call the Whambulance! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #54
I think Summers deserves full credit for not allowing Obama to nominate him. joshcryer Sep 2013 #52
What does that even mean? WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #66
You have not seen comments that suggest that since Summers is the "nominee" Obama is evil incarnate? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #71
You sound like a fortune cookie. WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #78
and you haven't been sounding very wise at all lately... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #83
I put that poster on ignore for a bit Vanje Sep 2013 #84
More like a committee of fortune cookies. N.T. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #130
I am not the one "predicting the future" with obviously invalid fortune cookies VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #219
No, VR sounds like someone who hates most DUers - and Elizabeth Warren muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #161
Who is objecting to Summers? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #217
So no matter what happens..... FredStembottom Sep 2013 #223
no.....but I have been right alot... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #224
Which to me sounds like: FredStembottom Sep 2013 #225
"what it sounds like to you" VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #227
Actually, I conduct myself pretty modestly around here. FredStembottom Sep 2013 #232
You might.....but was I originally talking to you? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #233
True. I did jump in. FredStembottom Sep 2013 #235
Must be a reason for the "hair on fire" gets brought up .... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #237
I think we have come to a resting place. FredStembottom Sep 2013 #238
Please remember that "we won" when Obama has yet another success.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #241
Yes, you show it - you hate us, and spend your time insulting us muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #228
hate a strong word... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #231
New word: "Derp-rage" amb123 Sep 2013 #203
for the "hair on fire rage brigade? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #220
Oh you poor poor baby. When this happens its called winning:) grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #197
so what's your next failed prediction? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #221
Obama will re-introduce the public option!!! grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #243
Oh Great...now you jinxed it! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #244
cue the stories about how Yellin is the spawn of Satan and the Wal-Mart heirs. nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #48
This is for you too Vanje Sep 2013 #55
I thought Summers would have been a terrible pick and greatly preferred Yellin. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #140
I think that's called political opinion........ socialist_n_TN Sep 2013 #144
The fickle nature of discussion boards is such that geek tragedy Sep 2013 #147
I think Yellin would be a GREAT Fed Chair Vanje Sep 2013 #152
Have they accused Yellin of being a secret PNAC plant yet? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #56
Go away Vanje Sep 2013 #57
"tough titty said the kitty VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #61
you had a grandmother ? Phlem Sep 2013 #70
one of the greatest ever... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #73
a tainted grandmother Vanje Sep 2013 #86
You know the saying. If her grandmother had testicles she'd be my grandfather. Quantess Sep 2013 #119
they're getting worse than teabaggers Phlem Sep 2013 #141
I so fucking love you Autumn Sep 2013 #159
Oh my god... DURHAM D Sep 2013 #172
Thanks! Phlem Sep 2013 #188
Thread police should be required to show their badge. nt sufrommich Sep 2013 #63
Not from me Aerows Sep 2013 #128
That's for the best. polichick Sep 2013 #53
Yea! truebluegreen Sep 2013 #58
Too many people are suspicious of Summers.. fadedrose Sep 2013 #60
Just like Obama planned it. WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #62
I think you and I just said the same thing but different......nt fadedrose Sep 2013 #65
He has been "Susan Rice'd" ProSense Sep 2013 #90
Never should have been on the list to begin with. WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #91
WOO HOO! bigwillq Sep 2013 #64
Janet Yellen should be an absolute shoo-in (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #67
I have a suggestion... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #74
We could only wish...nt roamer65 Sep 2013 #76
That would work! nt Vanje Sep 2013 #87
I don't think he's allowed near the White House. nt woo me with science Sep 2013 #97
They might even call Obama a commie.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #158
That would be awesome Aerows Sep 2013 #139
I'm sick of the "Mood Ring" school of economics. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #157
Me too Aerows Sep 2013 #168
Krugman has frequently said he's no administrator muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #163
Ask him if he would rather have Summers. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #169
He has many times said Janet Yellen is the best candidate muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #199
Okay, I respect his endorsement.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #215
Woow! that is hilarously laughable; how did that end? mazzarro Sep 2013 #218
He had a real hard time with his "Lazy Liberals on Welfare" routine... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #226
So would Krugman be bad at presidenting since he is not a good administrator? -- n/t mazzarro Sep 2013 #216
I'm sure he would say so muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #229
I'd make phone calls or send emails if he was nominated davidpdx Sep 2013 #175
Is it odd that I want to consider... Xyzse Sep 2013 #213
Wow. nt DanTex Sep 2013 #75
ROFL malaise Sep 2013 #77
Fabulous. Perhaps Obama is starting to listen to folks on point Sep 2013 #79
+1 grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #198
I almost want to cry, I'm so relieved. K&R n/t OneGrassRoot Sep 2013 #85
That is exactly how I feel Vanje Sep 2013 #89
Halle-fucking-lujah. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #88
Good riddance to bad rubish. JEB Sep 2013 #92
Well, well Iwillnevergiveup Sep 2013 #95
If it weren't for activists on DU, this would never have happened: they deserve all the credit! alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #96
Are you seriously making fun of activism? Vanje Sep 2013 #98
Oh, never that alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #105
It's always good to make fun of yourself. Jakes Progress Sep 2013 #106
:D Aerows Sep 2013 #143
That's exactly Caretha Sep 2013 #153
I see political activism is now a point of ridicule. Wow. myrna minx Sep 2013 #214
Kind of progress we are seeing today? Enthusiast Sep 2013 #100
Pop the Champagne! DonCoquixote Sep 2013 #101
Aww. I'm sure he can find another rich white banker for the job. Jakes Progress Sep 2013 #109
YES! Hopefully, the next guy going up for the position isn't a corrupt bankster... backscatter712 Sep 2013 #113
The next "guy" is likely to be a "gal." MADem Sep 2013 #122
WOOT! Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #114
Yayyyyyyy! Owl Sep 2013 #116
I think this is all down to Elizabeth Warren. She vowed to raise hell. MADem Sep 2013 #118
WOOOOOO FREAKIN HOOOOOO!!!!!!!! magical thyme Sep 2013 #131
This is FANTASTIC news! So amazingly great! Safetykitten Sep 2013 #134
This is the thing Ziggy's so scared of...... DeSwiss Sep 2013 #135
cool! heaven05 Sep 2013 #137
So, Larry's leadership "made the kind of progress we are seeing today." Buns_of_Fire Sep 2013 #146
Good. Here's hoping the nominee isn't someone less-known with the same mindset. n/t winter is coming Sep 2013 #149
To quote one of my favorite movies mythology Sep 2013 #151
Awesome ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #154
Stock futures up 20. Benton D Struckcheon Sep 2013 #155
Makes me downright giddy. mmonk Sep 2013 #156
Good news!! rury Sep 2013 #162
There goes a productive week of DUers denouncing the party. JohnnyRingo Sep 2013 #164
I dont think those "things" fixed themselves Vanje Sep 2013 #165
Maybe. JohnnyRingo Sep 2013 #182
Happy K&R What Obama saw in the misogynistic incompitent poseur I'll never know. pam4water Sep 2013 #166
Asian and Australian stock markets are already loving it. roamer65 Sep 2013 #170
OK, FDR Democrats, it's time to celebrate . . . Jack Rabbit Sep 2013 #171
Happy day! Schmuck that he is, noted his reluctance Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #173
I thanked my Senator Merkley on Friday... As we all should for him, Elizabeth Warren & Sherod Brown cascadiance Sep 2013 #174
Good riddance! emsimon33 Sep 2013 #176
. blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #180
sadly, I don't think the fact that he is so despised has any impact on him. niyad Sep 2013 #181
Great news. Probably not for the reasons Summers states, but great news AllyCat Sep 2013 #194
Yippee! Two wins in one week! You people are too much:)) grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #196
Now go away or we shall taunt you a second time! deutsey Sep 2013 #201
I'd like to join this celebration. myrna minx Sep 2013 #212
Good. K&R nt TBF Sep 2013 #222
But but but... ljm2002 Sep 2013 #230
Best news I've heard so far today. Beacool Sep 2013 #239
Withdraw his name from what? Was he nominated for something? Rex Sep 2013 #240
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
1. Fantastic
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:29 PM
Sep 2013
He described him as "a critical member of my team as we faced down the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and it was in no small part because of his expertise, wisdom, and leadership that we wrestled the economy back to growth and made the kind of progress we are seeing today."


That statement is offensive on so many levels.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
12. We are seeing progress?
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:32 PM
Sep 2013

I don't see a lot of economic progress in my little part of America. But maybe it's improving for other people.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
21. Not only as virtually all of the economic gains gone to the wealthiest Americans
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:41 PM
Sep 2013

Summers was actually part of the problem. He was a key part of the deregulation drive and invested heavily in interest rate swap derivatives at Harvard, derivatives being the financial vehicle that destroyed the world economy. He went from not even being a millionaire to being worth $15-$30m on speaking fees (and other influence peddling schemes) from big banks.

No way should he even be allowed near government officials.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
29. I know
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:44 PM
Sep 2013

The guy is a crook, pure and simple. I'm glad he's gone, but I'm angry that he did so much damage to the rest of us.

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
72. Interest rate swaps are pretty mild derivatives.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:10 PM
Sep 2013

They are also the vast majority if notional outstanding for all derivs.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
123. Anything that causes the Harvard endowment
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:22 PM
Sep 2013

to have $1 Billion vanish isn't a "mild" derivative or a "safer risk".

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
179. Not saying Summers is a good trader.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 09:59 PM
Sep 2013

Could just as easily drop a yard in stocks or bonds (particularly longer dated bonds).

Summers probably traded the IRswapq with a lot of leverage. Anyone can lose a lot at anything that way.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
183. The bond market is going to soar knowing he's out of the running
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 10:20 PM
Sep 2013

Please don't pretend he's good for anything.

It's insulting to yourself.

But I suppose if you wish to self-flagellate and tell me how he'd be great for the Bond market, please do.

I'll listen, patiently.

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
186. I have nothing particularly good to say about Summers.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 10:31 PM
Sep 2013

I was speaking only about IR swaps being a milder derivative.

I don't think Summers being out of the running will have much impact on the bond market. I certainly don't expect the bond market to soar absent some economic shock. Yellen and Bernanke are on the same team more or less, so she would probably continue his policies and hints at tapering fed bond purchases.

She is my pick too.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
187. He's a destructive economist
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 10:34 PM
Sep 2013

He has proven it time and again. She is my pick because she has a cool head, and if you check bond prices, they've already gone up one percent since he bowed out. Everyone in the world was taking a breath praying that destructive idiot didn't take the helm.

You need a cool head for that position, and Larry Summers could quite possibly do something fantastic as a 1% chance, or it could end in catastrophe which is the 99% likelihood of him running anything.

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
189. I see the 10 yr better by 2.5 bps. With SPX up 1%.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 10:42 PM
Sep 2013

I admit that is a strong bond move given the SPX move, but it is not like the 10 year bond moved a whole point.

Also hard to say how much of the SPX move is Syria related. Probably most of it.

Yes - Summers is a smug douche. Yellen has a strong relationship with all the fed governors. She should be a no brainer.

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
210. I stand corrected on market impacts of summers' exit.
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 10:04 AM
Sep 2013

Was out of town from Wednesday and missed a lot of the news. Didn't realize that there were reports out there that Summers was already given the nod etc.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
202. Hey Lucky..
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 08:50 AM
Sep 2013

Just wanted to pop in and say hi, haven't seen you around, and always appreciate your input into matters financial.

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
242. Hey DG!
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 06:59 PM
Sep 2013

Usually too super busy for much participation. I do lurk a lot and occasionally have quick one liner posts that are more of a bookmark for me than any kind of conversation.

Nice to see you!

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
185. It isn't going to help reducing the value of bonds
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 10:30 PM
Sep 2013

Increasing the value of them is a double-edged sword, but one that I think Yellen will make the right decision upon for our future generations. Summers would have just dumped the shit out of it and let everyone claim our assets as a nation because of inability to pay our bonds when he over leveraged them.

Good God. The fate we escaped with that asshole.

Left Coast2020

(2,397 posts)
195. Maybe thats where we come in...
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 01:43 AM
Sep 2013

I think he said something pertaining to "make me do it".

Okay, then lets make him nom. Ms. Yellen.

As Ed says, "Lets get to Work".

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
205. I think we have differing definitions
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 09:49 AM
Sep 2013

I consider economic progress being made if most of the country is making enough money to be comfortable. I don't see that happening yet.

They seem to think differently.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
236. No, we're thinking the same thing
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 02:00 PM
Sep 2013

"I consider economic progress being made if most of the country is making enough money to be comfortable. I don't see that happening yet. "

Agreed, the only economic progress has been for the 1% and corporations.

For the rest of us nothing.

So I thought maybe his definition was, he stopped the bleeding economically and he's calling that progress.

I haven't had a full time job in 5 yrs. I'm nearing 50 so I don't know if that has anything to do with it, but I see a lot of my colleagues still looking for work. And where I live, we're surrounded by upper middle class and the 1% but in the last 5 years, all those fancy cars driving around our area have disappeared and have been replaced by used cars and beaters.

We live about 5 miles from Microsoft with another Microsoft campus on the other side of us plus Seimens, and slew of other tech companies.

I think we agree.

-p

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
184. Romney is more of a stock man
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 10:28 PM
Sep 2013

but he's probably diversified. People that actually invest in our nation breathe a sigh of relief, I'm sure.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
191. Here's the thing. One of the ways the government pays for things is by issuing bonds....
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 11:28 PM
Sep 2013

Those bonds are traded on the Bond Market.

Wall Street considers the Bond Market to be it's RIVAL for investment capital.

This is why the Republicans are always running up the debt and claiming the government is broke. It's to discourage people from buying bonds. The way they talk it makes it sound like the government will default on those bonds and you will be left with worthless paper. It's also why Alan Greenspan made it so those bonds pay practically nothing in interest. Another boogieman Alan Greenspan has debunked is the notion that there will be a run on bonds. Since bonds are (for the most part) traded and not cashed there is never going to be a time when the government can't meet it's obligations to pay as the bulk of the bonds are in a perpetual float.

People like Romney get money from dividends on stocks and the entire focus of the economists has been on growing the Stock Market and paying shareholders. That's also why things like "jobs" aren't even considered since payroll is considered to be a liability on company ledgers.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
206. What else is new?
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 09:50 AM
Sep 2013

The guy has so much money that he's practically guaranteed a raise, even if the rest of the country is falling apart.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
211. Romney was great at one thing....
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 10:56 AM
Sep 2013

Being an example of the kind of rich bastard you WANT see have his taxes raised.

His spoiled sons were also a good example of raising the inheritance tax or "Death Tax" as Republicans like to call it.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
207. I hope they burn in hell
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 09:54 AM
Sep 2013

Or better, considering the things they've done, I want them to lose all of their money and their credit ratings. Force them to live like an average American, living paycheck to paycheck, always worrying about how to keep a job when the corporations don't care about their employees.

Let them see how the rest of us live.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
125. I was out of work for almost six months in 2009 because of the recession,
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:22 PM
Sep 2013

so things are definitely better off from a personal perspective. The Recovery Act benefited our company in an indirect, but significant way. I learned that I don't like deep recessions, I don't like them at all.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
133. Get used to them. As capitalism spirals downward.........
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:33 PM
Sep 2013

and the rate of profit for companies drop, these shocks, deep recessions and long depressions, will not only continue to happen, but will happen more frequently. Recovery times will become shorter between slumps and less beneficial, at least for the average worker. In other words, what happened in 2007/08 and the recovery from same will become the norm rather than a once in a lifetime event.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
208. I'm glad things are improving for you
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 09:56 AM
Sep 2013

I hope they continue to do so.

I just wish more people would see such positive results.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
209. There you go!
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 09:58 AM
Sep 2013

I wasn't able to see the top of the food chain!

It would be nice if the money could trickle down a bit more, though.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
200. I know...I nearly choked on my morning tea when I read that part in the OP.
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 06:11 AM
Sep 2013

For the very wealthy, there's been a monstrous amount of economic progress since '08. For the rest of us, not so much.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
204. Oh yeah
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 09:46 AM
Sep 2013

They've gotten a lot richer, when they honestly didn't need the money. Come on, after a certain point, you can't even spend all of it in one lifetime.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,648 posts)
2. I was SO SURE that this was the Onion...
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:29 PM
Sep 2013

I had to check to make sure it wasn't.

Wow. What great news!

I could not be more pleased.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
5. good. he should have done that much sooner.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:30 PM
Sep 2013

time for him to retire all together and go spend time with his family.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
108. I know
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:55 PM
Sep 2013

I saw that earlier. But Geithner was on the list of potential replacements, according to the article.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
69. Geithner is ok.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:09 PM
Sep 2013

Love him or hate him, he did his job at the FRB of NY well in 2008. The reason we are not in a second Great Depression is because of Paulson, Geithner and Bernanke. They delivered the needed liquidity to stabilize the situation.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
81. "They delivered the needed liquidity to stabilize the situation". .....for the banks
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:20 PM
Sep 2013

and left everyone else struggling.

There has been no recovery for the rest of us.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
93. I understand...
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:33 PM
Sep 2013

but do understand it could have been much worse. If we had followed the Andrew Mellon 1930's way of no bailouts we would now be staring 25 pct unemployment in face like early 1933...or maybe even worse.

The present situation is a failure of our do-nothing House of Representatives to pass needed jobs and work programs. Hopefully that will change in 2014.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
107. The bailouts should have been conditional.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:54 PM
Sep 2013

And those responsible for the fraud should still be in prison.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
136. "The bailouts should have been conditional.".........
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:36 PM
Sep 2013

That is an important statement and should be said again. So I did. I also agree with your second sentence too.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
178. how about the banks and their fucking derivatives? What has your team of experts done
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 09:55 PM
Sep 2013

about that? Millions have lost their homes and retirements and the banksters are wallowing in profits and you back the banksters.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
110. We need a economist with some sense at the Helm
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:00 PM
Sep 2013

Krugman for Chairman !

also amazed as how short some peoples memories are,,,,,, If you believe their post your would think that things are worst now than when Bush2 left us...... geeez!


Know your Enemy!

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
177. Holly smokes. They saved the banks. We are still screwed. You
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 09:52 PM
Sep 2013

are one that believes that the crumbs we receive from the 1% is all we need and therefore we must protect them.

I say bullshit. It's time to nationalize the fucking big banks that are robbing us blind.

Mass

(27,315 posts)
117. Geithner has already said NO, so no risk there.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:16 PM
Sep 2013

Just the latest proof of the media being unable to report properly.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
150. Maybe...maybe not.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:01 PM
Sep 2013

He's running the selection process.



I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall for the call between Geithner and Summers.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
17. Yayyyy!
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:37 PM
Sep 2013

YAYYYY!!!!!

If there was a beer in the fridge, I'd pop that bad boy, and drink it in celebration!


Fucking YAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

tomg

(2,574 posts)
26. Sometimes, and this could be one of them.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:43 PM
Sep 2013

So since we never know when it will work, we need to keep the pressure on them all the time.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
148. I think the Democrats are finally hearing us
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:54 PM
Sep 2013

if it had been a rethug as POTUS, this defeated snake would have been in.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
22. Best news I've heard all day
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:41 PM
Sep 2013

That idiot should be in a prison cell for pissing away 1 billion dollars when he mismanaged Harvard's funds. The damage that jackass could have done with 3 Trillion would have likely been more than the global economy could withstand. May he fade quietly into the woodwork and never be in charge of anything financial, including the till of a children's bake sale, ever again.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
129. That would have been epic.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:28 PM
Sep 2013

In any case, we as a nation and global part of the economy dodged a bullet.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
160. Geithner is running the selection process.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:23 PM
Sep 2013

I would love to have been a fly on the wall for the convo between him and Summers.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
192. Summers may have just backed off of his own accord--after all, Geithner wouldn't have
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 11:30 PM
Sep 2013

been holding his hand while EW excoriated him. I could be totally off, but he'd have to be pretty clueless to have believed he would do well at a hearing. And I can't see Geithner pleading for him to tough it out.

Ya never know, though...!

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
111. I hope for her, too
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:00 PM
Sep 2013

She seems to be highly qualified AND level-headed, things needed at the Fed. Not to mention, she also has a strong backbone instead of the childish bluster of an idiot like Summers.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
31. Oh Thank God! I wont have to foment revolution ....this week, any way
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:45 PM
Sep 2013

I can clear my calender for beer drinking, and playing with my doggies.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
138. Well, don't put down the Marx just yet.......
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:40 PM
Sep 2013

Ironic that I was just on a call where we discussed Rosa Luxemburg's "Reform or Revolution". One bullet dodged from the magazine of a machine gun.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
33. Great News! Now I've gotta check out Donald Kohn!
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:47 PM
Sep 2013

and maybe there's another one lurking that could be picked instead of Janet Yellen.

But, this so good to hear. Hopefully he listened to the Wall Streeters who are not part of the Greed Crowd who thought Yellen was steady and not an attention seeker.

Anyway....

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
46. Article says Yellen or Donald Kohn. Here's Kohn's Bio:
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:55 PM
Sep 2013
Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee Member Biography
Donald Kohn

http://www.fdic.gov/about/srac/bios-members/kohn.html

Donald Kohn is a Senior Fellow in the Economic Studies Program at the Brookings Institution. As the former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, Kohn is an expert on monetary policy, financial regulation and macroeconomics.

He advised Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke throughout the 2008-2009 financial crisis and also served as a key adviser to former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan.

Kohn is a 40-year veteran of the Federal Reserve System. Prior to taking office as a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, he was an adviser to the Board for Monetary Policy (2001-02), secretary of the Federal Open Market Committee (1987-2002), director of the Division of Monetary Affairs (1987-2001), and deputy staff director for Monetary and Financial Policy (1983-87). He also held several positions in the Board's Division of Research and Statistics: associate director (1981-83), chief of Capital Markets (1978-81), and economist (1975-78). He has also served as chairman of the Committee on the Global Financial System (CGFS), a central bank panel that monitors and examines broad issues related to financial markets and systems.

Kohn has written extensively on issues related to monetary policy and its implementation by the Federal Reserve. These works were published in volumes issued by various organizations, including the Federal Reserve System, the Bank of England, the Reserve Bank of Australia, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the National Bureau of Economic Research, and the Brookings Institution.

He was awarded the Distinguished Achievement Award from The Money Marketeers of New York University (2002), the Distinguished Alumni Award from the College of Wooster (1998), and the Honorary Degree, Doctor of Laws, from the College of Wooster (2006).

Kohn received a B.A. in economics in 1964 from the College of Wooster and a Ph.D. in economics in 1971 from the University of Michigan. He is married and has two adult children and four grandchildren.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
127. Yep...bothered me, too. At least he's not from Harvard...that's the plus
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:23 PM
Sep 2013

and that he's old enough to have seen what Greenspan's policies did to American Public.

But then...some never learn...no matter what they are faced with that confronts their ideology.

And, then I've read on some Business Sites that Yellen is no "pro-active enough" so that Obama might have someone not Kohn or Yellen in mind as a Surprise.

I'm cautious....but, thank the "WHATEVER" that Summers is OUT! He would have been such a disaster with his attention grabbing antics.



 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
132. I think Yellen is a good choice
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:32 PM
Sep 2013

I'm so so on anyone linked to Greenspan's policies. In any case, anybody but Summers is a freaking relief, so there is a shot of having someone the people can have confidence in. The only confidence I have in Summers is that when you shake his hand, you have to count your fingers afterwards to make sure they are all still there.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
145. True...lie down with dogs or cats in the wild...and one Ends up with Fleas.....
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:47 PM
Sep 2013

So...there's that old saying.

WATCH WHAT THEY DO.....NOT WHAT THEY SAY!

lyonn

(6,064 posts)
43. This news made my day!!
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:53 PM
Sep 2013

So much doom and gloom on the news and then this...... Obama can do better finding someone to handle "our" money - hope I have that right?! Isn't that what the Fed does....

Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #45)

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
66. What does that even mean?
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:06 PM
Sep 2013

Summers was a terrible nominee. These events prove that. So what the blue fuck are you talking about?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
71. You have not seen comments that suggest that since Summers is the "nominee" Obama is evil incarnate?
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:09 PM
Sep 2013

a Neocon puppet etc etc etc?

That poutrage has officially ended. Queue new reason to hate President Obama.....

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
78. You sound like a fortune cookie.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:17 PM
Sep 2013

In that your "wisdom" comes printed on very small slips of paper.

Derp.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
219. I am not the one "predicting the future" with obviously invalid fortune cookies
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 11:43 AM
Sep 2013

as the "Hair on Fire Brigade" around here....predictions that inevitably are proven wrong...over and over and over again. But we should listen to all your poutrage...because it is oh so very serious!

muriel_volestrangler

(101,324 posts)
161. No, VR sounds like someone who hates most DUers - and Elizabeth Warren
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:25 PM
Sep 2013

plus other people who had valid objections to Summers. So, now that the poor candidate has withdrawn, VR wants to call these valid objections "poutrage", because only VR is allowed to have valid objections. The rest of us (including Elizabeth Warren) are spoiled princesses if we think our opinion counts for anything.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
217. Who is objecting to Summers?
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 11:40 AM
Sep 2013

THIS is what I hate.....you guys CONSTANTLY taking anyone who criticizes your whining and poutrages to mean that they support the opposite. Couldn't be farther from the truth....I am just making fun of all those who thought the world was going to end and Summers would DEF. be the Fed Chair nominee.....the constant predicting of the future...the "hair on fire reaction to something that hasn't even happened and constantly proven wrong! Then the expectation that you will be taken seriously over and over and over again.

FredStembottom

(2,928 posts)
223. So no matter what happens.....
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:11 PM
Sep 2013

....you are the one who was right.
I have written that down and posted it on my fridge so I don't forget.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
224. no.....but I have been right alot...
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:14 PM
Sep 2013

Much more than the "Hair on Fire Brigade"....Every time one of your "fires" get proven to be another false alarm....you expect to be taken seriously on this blog. It is getting tiresome.....Stop predicting the future...you are just not good at it.

FredStembottom

(2,928 posts)
225. Which to me sounds like:
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:46 PM
Sep 2013

If what many of us here are afraid is about to happen, happens, then we were hysterical fools on the wrong side of the issue.
If the very same thing doesn't happen, then we were hysterical fools on the wrong side of a prediction.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
227. "what it sounds like to you"
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:52 PM
Sep 2013

is probably indicative of why you are perceived as hysterical in the first place...

FredStembottom

(2,928 posts)
232. Actually, I conduct myself pretty modestly around here.
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 01:24 PM
Sep 2013

So do many other DU'ers who get called hysterical.
That's the problem.
Which you and I will not resolve between us.
Which is too bad.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
233. You might.....but was I originally talking to you?
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 01:37 PM
Sep 2013

do you count yourself as among the "hair on fire brigade" or are you just in denial that one exists around here? You did want to jump in and make accusations towards me though....

FredStembottom

(2,928 posts)
235. True. I did jump in.
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 01:49 PM
Sep 2013

Because I find the "hair on fire" accusation gets tossed at reasonable, sound thinking people here at DU far, far too often.

I jumped in because those words are representative of a prolific DU group that behaves like bullies.
I used your comment to speak back to that group. That is probably wrong because I don't actually know you to be among them.

For that, I apologize.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
237. Must be a reason for the "hair on fire" gets brought up ....
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 02:04 PM
Sep 2013

perhaps if there weren't so many who do that..

a "prolific DU group that behaves like bullies"? I think you have just described the exact action of the "hair on fire brigade" and why I started posting ...They seemed to have bullied the Obama supporters into starting the BOG just to get away from them....but do go on...even if you are a bit behind the curve.

FredStembottom

(2,928 posts)
238. I think we have come to a resting place.
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 02:31 PM
Sep 2013

There's a lot of joy and celebration at DU today.
Join in! We won!

Woo-hoo!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
241. Please remember that "we won" when Obama has yet another success....
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 02:34 PM
Sep 2013

I expect you will stand up to the ODS and celebrate then too!

muriel_volestrangler

(101,324 posts)
228. Yes, you show it - you hate us, and spend your time insulting us
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:54 PM
Sep 2013

You're showing it time after time. You didn't make a comment like "good, I thought he was wrong", or "he would have been OK"; you attacked DUers with terms like 'poutrage', 'whaambulance', 'Queue new reason to hate President Obama', 'hair on fire', 'expect to be taken seriously' and more.

It's not even about supporting Obama for you - it's more about attacking the left. You are a massive troll who stinks up DU. I never actually said that you supported Summers, yet you jumped to that conclusion, when what I was criticising you for was your insulting posts about DUers in this thread.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
231. hate a strong word...
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:59 PM
Sep 2013

I have also provided great links....you just never read them. You can try to label me how ever you want....but saying I don't really support Obama...hahahahahahahahahah Come on...seriously...you want to try and go that far to discredit me? That is a most pathetic attempt....But of course "the hair on fire brigade" cannot stand criticism so it MUST be true right?


 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
140. I thought Summers would have been a terrible pick and greatly preferred Yellin.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:42 PM
Sep 2013

But, it's an ironclad rule at DU that every nomination gets at least one thread bashing the choice.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
147. The fickle nature of discussion boards is such that
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:48 PM
Sep 2013

the only woman who could save us from Larry Summers will inevitably be declared the real sellout choice.

Look for reposts of the articles noting that Wall Street wanted Yellin, not Summers.

Those were ignored while Summers was public enemy #1. Now that he's out . . .

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
152. I think Yellin would be a GREAT Fed Chair
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:06 PM
Sep 2013

I hope she gets in.

Be not putting all DUers who are celebrating Summers defeat, into the same boat.
We may not have as much to celebrate as we'd like, Lord knows. But let us have this one.
Don't dis people for celebrating the same thing you are celebrating.
There should be plenty of other threads available for disagreements.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
61. "tough titty said the kitty
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:05 PM
Sep 2013

but the milks still good" That's what my sainted Grandmother used to say!

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
58. Yea!
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:04 PM
Sep 2013


I wonder if he was smart enough to withdraw on his own, or if President Obama asked him to, in order to avoid another potential showdown with Congress....

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
60. Too many people are suspicious of Summers..
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:05 PM
Sep 2013

and Warren's not taking to him doesn't help.

If he doesn't have the confidence of the public, how can he do any good.

I like to support the President, but in this case, I'm glad Summers opted out. I'd be even gladder if the President hinted that he should opt out because of the confidence-trust issue regardless of his faith in Summers' ability.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
90. He has been "Susan Rice'd"
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:28 PM
Sep 2013

When she withdrew, some people claimed she was pushed.

See how that works?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
139. That would be awesome
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:41 PM
Sep 2013

but I doubt it will happen. He'd rock the boat too much, and you know, confidence is these rough economic times (as though there are ever times that aren't economically rough waters when Wall Street doesn't want their boat rocked, which is never).

muriel_volestrangler

(101,324 posts)
163. Krugman has frequently said he's no administrator
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:29 PM
Sep 2013

and would nor be a good Fed Chairman, Treasury secretary, or similar job.

Yes, I’ve heard about the notion that I should be nominated as Treasury Secretary. I’m flattered, but it really is a bad idea.

Part of the reason is that I am indeed the World’s Worst Administrator — and that does matter. Someone else can do the paperwork — but an administrative job requires making hiring and firing decisions, it means keeping track of many things, and that, to say the least, is not my forte.

Oh, and there’s not a chance that I would be confirmed.

But the main point, as I see it, is that it would mean taking me out of a quasi-official job that I believe I’m good at and putting me into one I’d be bad at.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/the-outside-man/?_r=0

muriel_volestrangler

(101,324 posts)
199. He has many times said Janet Yellen is the best candidate
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 05:44 AM
Sep 2013

From 2010:

Yellen To DC

Good news: Janet Yellen will be the Fed’s new #2. She’s open-minded, a good counterweight to the inflation hawks who think that any day now we’ll be partying like it’s 1979. She’s also a distinguished scholar, with much of her work in New Keynesian macro.

She’ll provide exactly the kind of intellectual flexibility the Fed needs.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/yellen-to-dc/?_r=0


Can a woman effectively run the Federal Reserve? That shouldn’t even be a question. And Janet Yellen, the vice chairwoman of the Fed’s Board of Governors, isn’t just up to the job; by any objective standard, she’s the best-qualified person in America to take over when Ben Bernanke steps down as chairman.

Yet there are not one but two sexist campaigns under way against Ms. Yellen. One is a whisper campaign whose sexism is implicit, while the other involves raw misogyny. And both campaigns manage to combine sexism with very bad economic analysis.
...
The other campaign against Ms. Yellen has been subtler, involving repeated suggestions — almost always off the record — that she lacks the “gravitas” to lead the Fed. What does that mean? Well, suppose we were talking about a man with Ms. Yellen’s credentials: distinguished academic work, leader of the Council of Economic Advisers, six years as president of the San Francisco Fed, a record of working effectively with colleagues at the Board of Governors. Would anyone suggest that a man with those credentials was somehow unqualified for office?

Sorry, but it’s hard to escape the conclusion that gravitas, in this context, mainly means possessing a Y chromosome.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/02/opinion/krugman-sex-money-and-gravitas.html


He's reiterated that after Summers withdrew:

First, he says President Obama must now pick Janet Yellen — in his opinion, she is simply the best candidate:

"... it’s really, really hard to see how Obama can justify not picking Janet Yellen at this point. Nobody else is as qualified; any other choice would look like spite."


He goes on to say that he feels bad for Larry Summers:

"Just a personal reaction: I’ve known Larry for all our adult lives, and looking at this sad play I realize how lucky I am to have reached a place where I’m no longer in the rat race. Obviously I’m plenty combative, and in a way still ambitious too; I do track my Twitter followers, wonder how each column will do on the most-emailed list, and all that. But there are no promotions I’m seeking, no honors I desperately desire that I don’t already have."


http://www.businessinsider.com/krugman-not-picking-janet-yellen-would-look-like-spite-2013-9
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
215. Okay, I respect his endorsement....
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 11:06 AM
Sep 2013

BTW: I'll repeat this true story...

I was at a party and someone I know was there talking loudly in full FOX "News"/Tea Party mode. I took him on telling him we needed the exact opposite of what he was saying. "We needed to use Keynesian Economics."

He nearly had a meltdown. I asked him if he even KNEW what 'Keynesian Economics' was and he said, "Some Commie thing from Kenya!!!"

I wasn't the only one there that burst out laughing.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
226. He had a real hard time with his "Lazy Liberals on Welfare" routine...
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:50 PM
Sep 2013

When there was one in the room saying what Liberals want is classic roughneck, blue collar construction jobs.

I tell people the last time there was a need for government to hire it created the infrastructure for the 20th Century. Things like paved rural roads for the new invention called the "truck" so farmers could get their crops to the market. We need to build a 21st century infrastructure which includes 300 mph cross country rail.

I'm now in Vegas and there are a LOT of people here who would LOVE to ride high speed rail to the beach. Everyone here also knows that is NOT going to happen as long as Republicans consider something like that a "win" for Harry Reid. Why don't they just come out and say it? "We will hold high speed rail (or ANY rail) to Vegas hostage as long as you refuse to vote for Republicans"

muriel_volestrangler

(101,324 posts)
229. I'm sure he would say so
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:57 PM
Sep 2013

He is a bit old to start thinking about a political career representing and leading people, really. It would be a complete change of direction for him.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
175. I'd make phone calls or send emails if he was nominated
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 09:29 PM
Sep 2013

Someone start a draft Krugman for Fed Chair petition.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
98. Are you seriously making fun of activism?
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:42 PM
Sep 2013

That DU members write to congress, write to the President, launch petitions.....
Thats all fodder for you to laugh at?

Is it useless?
Is it?

and that makes it funny to you?

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
105. Oh, never that
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:51 PM
Sep 2013

I'm making fun of presumptuous, self-congratulatory assholes.

Glad I could clear that up for ya!

 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
153. That's exactly
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:10 PM
Sep 2013

what he/she is saying. You see, this person hates real democrats. More than likely this person hates their self too. But back to the point, if you're happy, they're unhappy, if you are unhappy ...they are happy.

See how that works?

edited for grammer

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
101. Pop the Champagne!
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:49 PM
Sep 2013

This means that the powers that be are beginning to hear us, and that they realize we are not happy enough with them for 2014 or even 2016.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
118. I think this is all down to Elizabeth Warren. She vowed to raise hell.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:18 PM
Sep 2013

He should just pull her into the process; it would save a lot of agita.


Here is an article that isn't behind a pay wall: http://www.cnbc.com/id/100997096


....In recent weeks, several key Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee have come out publicly opposing a possible Summers nomination, including Jon Tester on Friday.

And several hundred economist signed a letter to President Obama urging him to pick Yellen. Former Fed official Alan Blinder was among them. On CNBC last week, Blinder said it wasn't so much an anti-Summers campaign as it was a pro-Yellen campaign.

"t's very unfortunate. It's led to a situation where people like myself and two or three hundred other economists...that list keeps growing by the way every minute ... they felt compelled to come out and take sides because it's like a campaign," Blinder said.
Blinder said Yellen's experience and judgment are the primary reasons he and other economists are pushing for her to succeed Bernanke.....One of the other criticisms of Summers had been that he was too cozy with Wall Street. But a CNBC survey this summer showed that even Wall Street thought Yellen should get the job.
....

Buns_of_Fire

(17,183 posts)
146. So, Larry's leadership "made the kind of progress we are seeing today."
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 06:48 PM
Sep 2013

Boy, if THAT isn't a comment that can be taken multiple ways!

But good for you, Larry. You saved everyone a lot of angst. Now get lost.

rury

(1,021 posts)
162. Good news!!
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:26 PM
Sep 2013

I am more than mildly repulsed by Larry Summers.
Don't like him, don't trust him.
Good riddance!!

JohnnyRingo

(18,636 posts)
164. There goes a productive week of DUers denouncing the party.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:31 PM
Sep 2013

Personally, I love when things fix themselves.

With the Syria crisis apparently unwinding as well, I don't know if jumping the gun on unprecedented outrage is even worth the stress anymore.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
165. I dont think those "things" fixed themselves
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 07:42 PM
Sep 2013

I think the voices of the outraged citizens were heard.

Viva la Outrage!

JohnnyRingo

(18,636 posts)
182. Maybe.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 10:19 PM
Sep 2013

Sure worked with Occupy Wall Street, and then I'm even old enough to remember when electric guitars ended the Vietnam War.

I hate to be a cynic, and I don't have any inside dope on why Summers withdrew, but such things usually happen for reasons of deeper strategy than lame duck cowering to an angry outburst from armchair iPad economists. I'm not sure how effective anonymous posters on internet forums are in shaping domestic policy, but I guess the end result is all that matters.

I just wouldn't get too full of myself about it.

Sarcastic as I was in my OP, I'm really just relieved to see a hopeful period when DUers aren't going at each other's throats. It'll be nice to see a week where no one has to pronounce a Democrat as "dead to me" or threaten to go full Paulite.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
170. Asian and Australian stock markets are already loving it.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 08:55 PM
Sep 2013

Australia's market hit a 5 year high on the news. Asian markets are up.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
173. Happy day! Schmuck that he is, noted his reluctance
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 09:14 PM
Sep 2013

in his letter, lol. Poor Larry really did want the job.

200 economists said, big mistake..oh well.

Summers was also facing opposition from more than 200 economists who signed an open letter in support of current Fed Vice Chair Janet Yellen.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/larry-summers-withdraws-name-2013-9#ixzz2f0v3UrbJ

imo, should have been offered to Joseph Stiglitz

K&R

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
174. I thanked my Senator Merkley on Friday... As we all should for him, Elizabeth Warren & Sherod Brown
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 09:23 PM
Sep 2013

Called his office and thanked him for them all saying they wouldn't support his nomination getting out of the banking committee. I'm betting that had a big influence on Summers pulling his name out. He knew that it would be a major problem if Obama had to get Republican votes to get his name out of committee.

We should all call them to thank them again tomorrow. They might have helped us a lot more than many of us realize.

AllyCat

(16,195 posts)
194. Great news. Probably not for the reasons Summers states, but great news
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 01:38 AM
Sep 2013

Wonder what other snake the banksters will float next.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
230. But but but...
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:57 PM
Sep 2013

...he wasn't the nominee. Why, he wasn't even on the list! I heard it right here on DU so it must be true!

Well in any case, HOORAY that he is now off the list. Let's keep making noise, writing on blogs, posting on DU and other venues, and of course contacting our representatives in Washington on the issues that matter to us. Right now I'd say the big one is TPP.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Summers Withdraws Name fo...