Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 04:13 PM Sep 2013

Heritage Puts Anti-Obamacare Billboard In Times Square After State Announces Huge Premium Drop

Tucked up above 42nd Street in Times Square, situated next to advertisements for Ripley’s Believe It or Not and Madame Tussaud’s, is a new political message that feels out of place in a space touting the latest in fashion and entertainment.

The billboard, sponsored by the Heritage Foundation, is shaped like a federal tobacco disclaimer and warns New Yorkers about the dangers of Obamacare: “WARNING: Obamacare may be hazardous to your health”:



The message is just the latest political stunt from the organization that first developed the individual health care mandate in 1989 and later touted Obamacare-like reforms in Massachusetts. But this strategy is particularly obtuse. While premiums in the law’s soon-to-be opened health care exchanges have varied throughout the country, New Yorkers will experience savings of at least 50 percent as a result of Obamacare.

THE REST:

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/09/12/2614771/fail-anti-obamacare-billboard-erected-time-square-york-announces-huge-premium-drop/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Heritage Puts Anti-Obamacare Billboard In Times Square After State Announces Huge Premium Drop (Original Post) Triana Sep 2013 OP
if you text hazard, are you going to be charged 10 bucks? hollysmom Sep 2013 #1
Text Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #2
I might leave off the P hollysmom Sep 2013 #12
"The least expensive plans may not offer wide access to hospitals and doctors." Wonderful coverage. leveymg Sep 2013 #3
This is somewhat to understand, with more people having access to any health care is better than Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #6
I assume you meant 'Medicaid', not 'Medicare'. A page from the healthcare.gov site says... Triana Sep 2013 #9
Coverage, even in a smaller network of participants, is better than no coverage at all Trekologer Sep 2013 #13
Hey Heritage Foundation, go fuck yourselves. Initech Sep 2013 #4
Fearmongers r Us lpbk2713 Sep 2013 #5
K & R Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #7
But they invented Obamacare nxylas Sep 2013 #8
never under estimate the stupidity of the republicans! madrchsod Sep 2013 #10
Stupid. Cha Sep 2013 #11

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. "The least expensive plans may not offer wide access to hospitals and doctors." Wonderful coverage.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 04:29 PM
Sep 2013
The plans to be offered on the exchanges all meet certain basic requirements, as laid out in the law, but are in four categories from most generous to least: platinum, gold, silver and bronze. An individual with annual income of $17,000 will pay about $55 a month for a silver plan, state regulators said. A person with a $20,000 income will pay about $85 a month for a silver plan, while someone earning $25,000 will pay about $145 a month for a silver plan.

The least expensive plans, some offered by newcomers to the market, may not offer wide access to hospitals and doctors, experts said.



Care to explain how this is such a good thing for those who aren't so poor that they qualify for Medicare but can't afford Blue Cross?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
6. This is somewhat to understand, with more people having access to any health care is better than
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 04:47 PM
Sep 2013

No health care. When free health clinics are set up, many comes from miles around. Lower premiums with more insured. This should spread the cost of premiums. Right now hospitals and health care providers has their cost spread to those with health insurance and government provided safety nets. Right now if you are young and are involved in an accident and do not have health insurance someone has to pick up the cost if you are able to afford the cost.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
9. I assume you meant 'Medicaid', not 'Medicare'. A page from the healthcare.gov site says...
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:43 PM
Sep 2013

... depending on income, even if you won't be eligible for Medicaid in 2014 (you may be eligible even if you weren't before, if your state has chosen to expand its Medicaid coverage), you may qualify for an advance tax credit to help pay for your insurance premiums, if your income falls within certain ranges. Details here:

https://www.healthcare.gov/will-i-qualify-to-save-on-monthly-premiums/

Kaiser Family Foundation has provided a calculator to help you determine if you're eligible for this premium assistance:

http://kff.org/interactive/subsidy-calculator/

Trekologer

(997 posts)
13. Coverage, even in a smaller network of participants, is better than no coverage at all
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 11:56 AM
Sep 2013
Care to explain how this is such a good thing for those who aren't so poor that they qualify for Medicare but can't afford Blue Cross?


New entrants to the marketplace suggests that they haven't yet built a large network of participating providers. Which isn't any different than other, more established insurance plans: not every doctor or hospital participates in every plan.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
8. But they invented Obamacare
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 04:54 PM
Sep 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:21 AM - Edit history (1)

They may have well have put up a billboard reading "Don't listen to us, our ideas are terrible".

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
10. never under estimate the stupidity of the republicans!
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 07:52 PM
Sep 2013

i have pointed this fact out to my right wing friends on facebook. funny they never challenge me on that fact.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Heritage Puts Anti-Obamac...