General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSyria welcomes Russia’s offer to put its chemical weapons under intl control
The Syrian Foreign Ministry has welcomed Russias call to hand control over its chemical weapons to the international community.
Syria Arab Republic welcomes Russias initiative, based on the Syrians government care about the lives of our people and security of our country, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem said in response to the statement by his Russian counterpart.
We are calling on the Syrian authorities not only agree on putting chemical weapons storages under international control, but also for its further destruction and then joining the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said earlier.
http://rt.com/news/syria-chemical-weapons-handover-619/
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)sometimes RT is not that bad
Well lets hope this news is a start to a new beginning.
caledesi
(11,903 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)This will make the case to use missiles far more difficult to achieve.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)No need for strikes.
Love it.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)It's unlikey the US will be a part of this conversation. If a military strike does occurr with out without congressional approval we will know this about more than chemical weapons IMO.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)who is setting who up?
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)If the US ignores this or rejects the idea or refuses to be a part of the conversation and happens to proceed with military intervention would this not reveal publicly that the US intentions and interests are no wholly about the use of chemical weapons?
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)the cards are laid out on the table for the whole world to see and even european allies would then yell foul if the US went ahead.
I think its a game changer.that the administration will have to play with
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Give this country credit for what they have done to get rid of Syria's gas supplies.Hard to understand the unrelenting attempt to discredit Obama and this country on everything damned thing.
allinthegame
(132 posts)I saw yesterday that Kerry had floated the idea and the Russians picked on it
Stay alert
lumpy
(13,704 posts)effort by both countries. Lets hope Syria fullycooperates.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)the action of the US and Russia working together (and the much maligned Mr. Kerry) to bring assad to the bargaining table.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)lumpy
(13,704 posts)details of the clash between the two.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)and Syria and Russia immediately jumped on it.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts).... but I fear it's just a delaying tactic to allow Assad more time to murder as many of his people as he can.
Still, I think it's worth hearing out. If it happens, Obama could be seen as a strategic genius.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Damn.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Seriously I dont understand how killing innocent Syrians is the proper punishment for innocent Syrians having been killed.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Next thing you know, peace will start breaking out in Syria.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Holy shit.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Oh please let this happen. There is nothing funnier than the face of a warmonger suffering combatis interuptus.
When I served, it was a common saying that "we go do our job, when politicians fail at theirs". Meaning the military was suppose to be the tool of last choice. That is not the case, and I'm not sure when that changed. But it would be so satisfying for actual diplomacy to work. The sound of sabers rattling in the distance is becoming wearisome.
Once again...If we really want to do something positive about chemical and biological weapons: lead the way, destroy ours, all of them. Very publicly with great fanfare destroy our weaponized stores. Walk the walk first, then talk the talk. Stay at the top of the game informationally, but not practically. We have the world largest military and the most nuclear weapons, we can retaliate for a chemical/biological attack.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)these are weapons that cannot be used.
How can the US demand that a country has no right to possess them, when we won't give up ours?
Oh that's right, we're special, were not bound under international laws such as the World Court, or any other treaties that we don't want to follow.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)first chemical
second biological
third nuclear
each step is separate and takes "X" period of time.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)for well over 50 yrs. now, in fact we are not following treaties that we have already signed and agreed on.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)North Dakota.
Minot Air Force Base
Strategic Air Command
Hundreds of milti-warheaded ICBMS
lumpy
(13,704 posts)explain why the US has destroyed all but 10 percent of US chemical weapons.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)lumpy
(13,704 posts)unusable, aging, rusting etc.weapons requiring very special handling. The process of getting rid of those weapons is very time consuming and dangerous; They are very tricky to handle, put under extreme heat until completely nullified.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)UN Weapons Inspectors, with unlimited access.
What we demand, we support universally.
PROVE IT
TommyCelt
(838 posts)...but President Obama and Secretary Kerry are being taken to school...Diplomacy 101.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)American poker 101!
Tommy "celt"
yeah I am starting to get wise...
Aerows
(39,961 posts)as long as it makes for a more peaceful damn world.
TommyCelt
(838 posts)I don't care whose nose get politically bloodied. As long as diplomacy is being emplyed rather than missiles.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)TommyCelt
(838 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)of course you wouldn't know it..
TommyCelt
(838 posts)I forgot. I'm some guy on some Bristish blog too. Apologies.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but you are posting here...
TommyCelt
(838 posts)However, you previously posted the following to me...
"a least I am not over at British political blogs trying to pass....Should I start practicing spelling "colour" and "favour" and calling apartments flats and umbrellas bumbershoots and stollers prams just in case?"
Why?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)TommyCelt
(838 posts)Enjoy!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)in this instance, and I will not be ashamed to say that I was, if it turns out I am.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)TommyCelt
(838 posts)..vanilla "rhapsody"
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)a least I am not over at British political blogs trying to pass....Should I start practicing spelling "colour" and "favour" and calling apartments flats and umbrellas bumbershoots and stollers prams just in case?
TommyCelt
(838 posts)...or any other "celt" handle, you're mistaken. I post here and HuffPo under TommyCelt, and nowhere else. On a couple of religious blogs, I use my full name which doesn't include 'celt' anywhere.
You're confused.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I think you know...
TommyCelt
(838 posts)Care to let me in on it?
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)which would be ironic.
TommyCelt
(838 posts)This is the only handle/membership I've ever had or used here.
So I reiterate...VR, you're confusing me with someone else.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)of chemical weapons has offered to hand them over....and You call that a "screw up"? One of 5 remaining countries with chemical weapons offers to give them up...but that wasn't calculated...that was a "screw up"
Yeah right...
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)lumpy
(13,704 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)at least Obama doesn't have to continue to sweat bullets that he is caught up in own recklessness.
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #28)
TommyCelt This message was self-deleted by its author.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)and degrade Obama and US efforts to find a solution to the use of CWs.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)I think this has turned into a nightmare for Obama and Kerry. It was a good thing Putin came up with this idea. It proves that there was more room for negotiation...there was no need for the rush to war.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)just a slam against the administration as usual. Like Kerry and Obama haven't worked with Russia to bring about a solution....We needed Russian support in this fight and looks like we got it.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)are out.
Well, back to the drawing board.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)all over the world. It's disgusting, and I think pretty much everyone knows it, too. This is a victory for the world, not for any particular party.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Recommended
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I have heard he is an astute poker player. Being good at poker means you know how to "force your opponents hands".
As I said....underestimate at your peril.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that came up with the idea to quit killing people.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Most sane people don't like the idea of bombing the fuck out of a country.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)lumpy
(13,704 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)#Putin just offered #Obama a lifeboat, a diplomatic solution that allows the postponement of a vote on military action he may well lose.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)he is the one gassing civilians...
but of course PJ Crowley didn't think of that one...
Avalux
(35,015 posts)This is what I believe, which means he tricked Putin (of all people!) into orchestrating a diplomatic solution. Of course Obama will not get Congressional support, they have vowed to never agree with him on anything.
Obama is not stupid, and he didn't suddenly turn into a warmonger.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Don't know who in hell Mr. Crowley is, but the lifeboat has come in handy for Russia also,( Putin is the one who plays footsie with Syria). In the end it doesn't matter who initiated the idea. Whenever the end comes.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)If a side wins in Syria there is going to be genocide (it already is happening). Put the chemical genie back in the bottle, everyone saves face and we can go on ignoring Syria.
Who wants to get back to discussing twerking?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I predict a sudden rush of new OP's on anything BUT Syria...
lumpy
(13,704 posts)and Kerry black eyes. They can't all be right wingers can they?
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)(If only someone had offered to take his chemical weapons off his hands before, then he wouldn't have been forced to get rid of them by using them on his own people. That Assad is such a laugh-riot.)
Assad and Putin both look desperate -- that's the word that comes to mind. Assad, about to implode; and Putin like he's holding a hot potato, he can't wait to get rid of.
So as we see, Putin could've solved this long ago by putting pressure on Assad. That makes Putin responsible for the whole mess that ensued. Nobody's going to say that of course because they want Putin "inside the tent, pissing out" not the other way around. For his part, it also shows that Putin might rather have it that way too. I'm sure it's more fun hanging with the G20 than with the international pariahs.
Mr.Bill
(24,309 posts)Drops mike, walks out of room.