Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,320 posts)
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:58 AM Sep 2013

Let's Use the Current Syria Dilemma to Make a Major Change.

1. Let's announce our complete failure to influence the Middle East in a good way.

2. Let's announce an immediate withdrawal of all U.S. forces from the entire region. Let's explain that, while we meant to intervene to promote democratic governments in the Middle East, we failed in achieving that goal, and failed badly. Let's use all available means to get all U.S. Military personnel out of the region. Right now, we have a number of Naval vessels in the area capable of ferrying those troops to nearby countries where they can be transported back to the U.S. by air.

3. Let's announce that all destructive armaments in U.S. hands will be destroyed or made completely non-functional as we remove U.S. troops. Capital improvements at U.S. facilities will become the property of each government once we leave.

4. Let's announce that from today forward we would apply severe economic sanctions against any nation that attacks its own citizens or prevents them from exercising their universal human rights.

5. Let's announce that the U.S. will ask the United Nations General Assembly to implement substantial sanctions against any nation that attacks its own citizens or fails to hold regularly scheduled elections to determine what its citizens want. Nations that fail to adhere to these rules will lose all voting privileges in the U.N. until they follow those rules.

6. Let's announce that, effective immediately, the U.S. will begin by freezing all assets of any nation that attacks its own citizens or prevents them from exercising universal human rights.

7. Let's announce that nations that do not support these measures will no longer have Most Favored Nation status with regard to trade, tariffs, and other benefits. Those benefits will be restored when those nations support the measures.

8. Let's announce our intentions not to participate in conflicts in that region by using any military force, military assistance, or military supplies in the future in the entire region.

9. Let's announce an embargo on the shipment of all destructive armaments and the means to manufacture them to any nation in the Middle East by any other nation. Such shipments will result in economic sanctions against nations who supply destructive armaments or the means to manufacture such armaments, including loss of trade incentives and other penalties.

10. Let's begin our withdrawal and other elements within 48 hours, and make all withdrawal actions as expeditious as humanly possible.

How does that sound?

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's Use the Current Syria Dilemma to Make a Major Change. (Original Post) MineralMan Sep 2013 OP
Perfect newfie11 Sep 2013 #1
Well, that's what I'd do, and immediately. MineralMan Sep 2013 #2
+1 newfie11 Sep 2013 #15
The banksters, the REAL movers & shakers annabanana Sep 2013 #3
And that does not change my proposal in any way. MineralMan Sep 2013 #5
and I agree that our most effective leverage as a Country, annabanana Sep 2013 #8
Interesting proposal - but you probably need to address what we will do with Israel. el_bryanto Sep 2013 #4
Israel manufactures its own armaments. MineralMan Sep 2013 #7
The same as for the rest of the region. MineralMan Sep 2013 #10
I like your list... NCTraveler Sep 2013 #6
See, the removal off all U.S. military assets is the foundation MineralMan Sep 2013 #9
I think that limited assets can be left in place and your proposal would still work. NCTraveler Sep 2013 #12
Nope. Everything. Out. MineralMan Sep 2013 #14
I agree 100%. That is where we should be. nt stevenleser Sep 2013 #11
I have had the same position on the Middle East MineralMan Sep 2013 #13
I'm all for your proposals panader0 Sep 2013 #16
I don't think they will be implemented either. MineralMan Sep 2013 #17
My guess is that nothing would change in the ME. randome Sep 2013 #18
Well, I don't qualify as either. MineralMan Sep 2013 #19
Well done. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #20

MineralMan

(146,320 posts)
5. And that does not change my proposal in any way.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:05 AM
Sep 2013

How's that? I'm describing the course of action I would take, if I had the capability of doing so. It's a theoretical exercise, since I clearly have no such capability.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
8. and I agree that our most effective leverage as a Country,
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:07 AM
Sep 2013

(should we be allowed to exercise it) is economic.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
4. Interesting proposal - but you probably need to address what we will do with Israel.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:04 AM
Sep 2013

What would we do if Israel is attacked?

Bryant

MineralMan

(146,320 posts)
7. Israel manufactures its own armaments.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:07 AM
Sep 2013

It can defend itself. I include Israel in my proposal, since it is a nation in that region. No nation would be exempt in what I'm proposing.

Israel is an artificial nation, created by the West. In fact, the borders of most of the Middle East were imposed on the region by the West. It was a bad idea to do that. It does not work.

Israel is a modern nation, that has the capacity to mount its own defense. Let it do so.

MineralMan

(146,320 posts)
10. The same as for the rest of the region.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:09 AM
Sep 2013

Israel has it's own military and defensive capabilities. They should use those, if attacked.

The entire region is part of my proposal.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. I like your list...
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:06 AM
Sep 2013

Not big on 5 or 6 and I don't agree that all assets should be withdrawn from the Middle East. The overall message from you list is very good.

MineralMan

(146,320 posts)
9. See, the removal off all U.S. military assets is the foundation
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:08 AM
Sep 2013

of the proposal. So, without that, there is no proposal at all.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
12. I think that limited assets can be left in place and your proposal would still work.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:14 AM
Sep 2013

I am talking mainly Naval and covert assets. Not bases, boots on the ground, airfields, ext. Out of sight, out of mind.

MineralMan

(146,320 posts)
14. Nope. Everything. Out.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:19 AM
Sep 2013

Leave the region to its own governance. Let them find peace. If they cannot, then that's their problem, as far as I am concerned. We have tried, and we have failed miserably. We have bungled virtually everything we have done in that region, and are not competent to participate.

Let the region determine its own fate. Perhaps it will eventually realize that peace is more useful than conflict. Or, perhaps not.

My plan is theoretical, of course. But it's my plan, so I can include whatever I want in it. It's not going to go into effect, I'm sure, but I think it would work nicely if it did.

MineralMan

(146,320 posts)
13. I have had the same position on the Middle East
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:16 AM
Sep 2013

since the early 1960s. Exactly the same position. It hasn't been the position of the U.S., though, and that's a shame.

Several people have brought up Israel, and that's something I've considered, too. Israel now has its own very competent military and arms capable of mass destruction. That's enough. Let them defend their own nation. Let all nations in the Middle East deal with their own conflicts. If they're smart, they'll deal with them in a way that promotes peace. If not, then the current conflicts will continue, but without U.S. participation in any way, under my plan.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
16. I'm all for your proposals
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:31 AM
Sep 2013

But I don't think they have a chance to be implemented.
Right now, I'd settle for a robust diplomacy campaign.

MineralMan

(146,320 posts)
17. I don't think they will be implemented either.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:34 AM
Sep 2013

In fact, I'm sure they won't.

As for a robust diplomacy campaign, that's a great idea, too. We haven't succeeded in that, either, because we don't understand the region and approach diplomacy from our own perspective. That trick never works (apologies to Rocky).

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
18. My guess is that nothing would change in the ME.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:58 AM
Sep 2013

Thousands of years of sectarian violence shows no sign of abating. What the region truly needs is a ME version of Martin Luther King. Or even Jesus.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's Use the Current Syr...