Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
428 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No. (Original Post) WilliamPitt Sep 2013 OP
No, absolutely no. scarletwoman Sep 2013 #1
Hell no. jsr Sep 2013 #2
The GOP says No all the time and we despise them dickthegrouch Sep 2013 #403
I'm with you, Will. Not just no, but fuck NO. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #3
I must say that every time you use the F word it startles me lol 1awake Sep 2013 #342
My dear Peggy... ncrainbowgrrl Sep 2013 #358
No only no, but FUCK NO. Koko Ware Sep 2013 #4
HELL NO! RC Sep 2013 #5
No. Fucking. Way. No. How. cherokeeprogressive Sep 2013 #6
No, no, no, no, no fadedrose Sep 2013 #7
No pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #8
No nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #9
no. QC Sep 2013 #10
Nope NV Whino Sep 2013 #11
Is the question "do you fancy some more red wine?" arcane1 Sep 2013 #12
Naw, just hell naw Union Scribe Sep 2013 #13
NO! nt alsame Sep 2013 #14
. . . Triana Sep 2013 #15
I never tire... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #199
I love Grumpy Cat! Triana Sep 2013 #202
Me too... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #208
Awwwwr. Triana Sep 2013 #286
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #16
Your defeatist post advocates that we all & everybody go silent. Wrong. Raise a voice & others join! Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2013 #30
Well put. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #248
Alas that's the problem nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #33
with the "Unitary Executive" theory, it may not matter fascisthunter Sep 2013 #52
But at that point we might be crossing into nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #56
true fascisthunter Sep 2013 #61
That damn Chinese curse strikes again my friend nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #62
If it didn't matter, Veilex Sep 2013 #369
NO! n/t Holly_Hobby Sep 2013 #17
Hell fucking no! n/t Catherina Sep 2013 #18
Oh HELL no. Autumn Sep 2013 #19
Indeed starroute Sep 2013 #183
Noooooooooo. roamer65 Sep 2013 #20
how about... no. devils chaplain Sep 2013 #21
NO! nt City Lights Sep 2013 #22
No. nt LWolf Sep 2013 #23
NO. Shrike47 Sep 2013 #24
No way. No how. No exceptions. nolabear Sep 2013 #25
No! felix_numinous Sep 2013 #26
Absolutely no n/t MissDeeds Sep 2013 #27
Yes Please!!!! I beg for this!!! Lucky Luciano Sep 2013 #28
No sagetea Sep 2013 #29
Assuming you're referring to the upcoming war, Brigid Sep 2013 #31
NO (And while I'm proud to stand with you and several other DUers whom I've come to respect ... 11 Bravo Sep 2013 #32
No. woo me with science Sep 2013 #34
No fking way Vincardog Sep 2013 #35
No !!! WillyT Sep 2013 #36
What, you got a problem with 'common sense'? Why, everyone who's anyone knows that it's HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #37
No fucking way. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #38
No. MotherPetrie Sep 2013 #39
Hell no. GeorgeGist Sep 2013 #40
Ain't gonna study war no more.... catnhatnh Sep 2013 #41
Fuck No. Change has come Sep 2013 #42
With you Brother fascisthunter Sep 2013 #43
No Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #44
Absolutely NO NorthCarolina Sep 2013 #45
Hell no! Curmudgeoness Sep 2013 #46
yes, i support obama Liberal_in_LA Sep 2013 #47
I say, NO WAy, NO HOw!! AAO Sep 2013 #48
No. think4yourself Sep 2013 #49
No, non, não, nein! n/t ocpagu Sep 2013 #50
More to the point: HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #53
No BuelahWitch Sep 2013 #51
No Half-Century Man Sep 2013 #54
I'll be your huckleberry... Zorra Sep 2013 #55
No!!! SecularMotion Sep 2013 #57
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Buddaman Sep 2013 #58
No curlyred Sep 2013 #59
No. yellerpup Sep 2013 #60
no.... mike_c Sep 2013 #63
No. MoonRiver Sep 2013 #64
No. Neutrino_603 Sep 2013 #65
No - Hell - No cantbeserious Sep 2013 #66
No. Nothing to win. Much to loose. nt wandy Sep 2013 #67
If Obama does this in opposition to overwhelming resistance OKDem08 Sep 2013 #68
Madame Chanel had a slogan. grasswire Sep 2013 #69
No, no, no. Greybnk48 Sep 2013 #70
Just say no. GreatCaesarsGhost Sep 2013 #71
No notadmblnd Sep 2013 #72
Hell no. myrna minx Sep 2013 #73
no. NMDemDist2 Sep 2013 #74
I won't wait for the translation mockmonkey Sep 2013 #75
No. Flaxbee Sep 2013 #76
. Hydra Sep 2013 #77
Um,...no. ..nt TeeYiYi Sep 2013 #78
This message was self-deleted by its author JackBeck Sep 2013 #79
You think Will Pitt doesn't have them on speed dial tavalon Sep 2013 #98
No. Not Now. Maybe Later KittyWampus Sep 2013 #80
NO! Paper Roses Sep 2013 #81
Fuuuuuuck no! dorkzilla Sep 2013 #82
It was a "NO!" from me with a Republican at the helm, and it's a "NO!" from me now with a Grown2Hate Sep 2013 #83
No. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #84
No. AzDar Sep 2013 #85
NO! Texasgal Sep 2013 #86
No, though I'm good on the humanitarian aid and the UN/ICC getting involved tavalon Sep 2013 #87
I'm still trying to decide. Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #88
LOL !!! WillyT Sep 2013 #94
NO! Sognefjord Sep 2013 #89
Hvor bliver De? Måske Mågøyane? Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #101
Serene Eastern Iowa Sognefjord Sep 2013 #294
Western WI in my case. Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #370
No. secondvariety Sep 2013 #90
no!! absolutely no!! fantase56 Sep 2013 #91
no redwitch Sep 2013 #92
No. Unprovoked War must stop here and now. n/t n2doc Sep 2013 #93
No neverforget Sep 2013 #95
No AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #96
No. nt Live and Learn Sep 2013 #97
No. Alkene Sep 2013 #99
yup...absolutely NO! nradisic Sep 2013 #100
Absolutely dinger130 Sep 2013 #102
shit no bigtree Sep 2013 #103
No, also n/t Yo_Mama Sep 2013 #104
Hell No. Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #105
nope . .. .n/t annabanana Sep 2013 #106
It was "No" yesterday, it's "No" today, and it'll be "No" tomorrow, too. nt Buns_of_Fire Sep 2013 #107
Nay Kablooie Sep 2013 #108
N fucking O! whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #109
What, exactly, am I supposed to say "NO" to? nt antigop Sep 2013 #110
NO! SammyWinstonJack Sep 2013 #111
No LittleBlue Sep 2013 #112
No!!! raindaddy Sep 2013 #113
NO ellaydubya Sep 2013 #114
It may be the only time I agree with my R reps Melissa G Sep 2013 #115
HELL NO!!! n/t Raksha Sep 2013 #116
DU'er who's on here everyday, yet seldom comment unless I think I have something to really add mike dub Sep 2013 #117
No, no, no, just plain no. 99Forever Sep 2013 #118
I wonder what Cryptoad Sep 2013 #119
Yes, our military interventions have saved many lives in the past. RedCappedBandit Sep 2013 #123
Very True! nt Cryptoad Sep 2013 #126
They have philosslayer Sep 2013 #155
And since then? RedCappedBandit Sep 2013 #319
yes Cryptoad Sep 2013 #363
Bombing is always the best way to save people from dying Marrah_G Sep 2013 #170
If he gases his own people he will not give a shit if we bomb them. Mojorabbit Sep 2013 #203
What's your response going to be if the whatever is done is ineffective? JHB Sep 2013 #246
Why do yall think that a GOP type response is the only response? Cryptoad Sep 2013 #314
Dude. bullsnarfle Sep 2013 #347
No,,,, Cryptoad Sep 2013 #362
So you think bullsnarfle Sep 2013 #399
our President should have free range to assassinate anyone he/she wants to Cryptoad Sep 2013 #416
You use the term "GOP solution" when you propose "shock & awe for one"? Seriously? JHB Sep 2013 #357
WE have drones that so small Cryptoad Sep 2013 #361
The problem with your argument is that you need to prove those drones can do that. JHB Sep 2013 #373
I am sure of very little Cryptoad Sep 2013 #375
No, god damnit. nt RedCappedBandit Sep 2013 #120
No, no, no, and just in case you didn't hear me, NO! sarchasm Sep 2013 #121
No leftstreet Sep 2013 #122
No Shankapotomus Sep 2013 #124
NO! alittlelark Sep 2013 #125
OPPOSITE OF yes... MrMickeysMom Sep 2013 #127
No. n/t KarenS Sep 2013 #128
No times a gazillion. forestpath Sep 2013 #129
HELL NO!!!! n/t eridani Sep 2013 #130
If I'm not asking why, I'm saying no. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #131
No tnlurker Sep 2013 #132
No suffragette Sep 2013 #133
Of course NO n/t totodeinhere Sep 2013 #134
Absolutely no! No more war!! davekriss Sep 2013 #135
Nope. nt Denver Progressive Sep 2013 #136
No Auggie Sep 2013 #137
Hell NO William!!! ralps Sep 2013 #138
No no no no and again no azurnoir Sep 2013 #139
NO. Crewleader Sep 2013 #140
no 90-percent Sep 2013 #141
No. T Roosevelt Sep 2013 #142
No. Iggo Sep 2013 #143
10-4 good buddy. I'm for NO. grattsl Sep 2013 #144
No. YankeyMCC Sep 2013 #145
noooooooooooo SummerSnow Sep 2013 #146
no no and hell no Tuesday_Morning Sep 2013 #147
No. n/t onyourleft Sep 2013 #148
Not now. Not later. NO. PDJane Sep 2013 #149
If you're talking about another pointless war in the middle east, then I'm with you, Will Jack Rabbit Sep 2013 #150
No bowens43 Sep 2013 #151
Hell No. cate94 Sep 2013 #152
No. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #153
No. RT_Fanatic Sep 2013 #154
Absolutely no. nt tblue Sep 2013 #156
No. Mr_Jefferson_24 Sep 2013 #157
hell no frylock Sep 2013 #158
No fucking way! Initech Sep 2013 #159
No. Details here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023581450 Dems to Win Sep 2013 #160
Nope. Enough is enough. nt dog_lovin_dem Sep 2013 #161
No way. No how. avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #162
NO. KatyaR Sep 2013 #163
hell no! n/t wildbilln864 Sep 2013 #164
No sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #165
NO Denis 11 Sep 2013 #166
NO emsimon33 Sep 2013 #167
fuck no. mopinko Sep 2013 #168
Absolutely not. nt sarge43 Sep 2013 #169
No nt Tien1985 Sep 2013 #171
No jopacaco Sep 2013 #172
No.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #173
NO! And I agree that we should go back to calling it the Department of War kath Sep 2013 #262
The change reeks of a Madison Avenue focus group. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #263
Too whimsical/authoritarian for me. MrModerate Sep 2013 #174
Presume you refer to Syria. I say no also. n/t malthaussen Sep 2013 #175
*sigh* No First Speaker Sep 2013 #176
NO DJ13 Sep 2013 #177
Wait a minute... Oakenshield Sep 2013 #305
Hell NO! Carolina Sep 2013 #178
I don't usually post here, but I read DU vlakitti Sep 2013 #179
Nein... KansDem Sep 2013 #180
No! truebluegreen Sep 2013 #181
No. Owl Sep 2013 #182
I say no. TransitJohn Sep 2013 #184
Just NO MostlyAmused Sep 2013 #185
NO tencats Sep 2013 #186
2 DU No's from this household Autumn Colors Sep 2013 #187
yes. iamthebandfanman Sep 2013 #188
no Kip Humphrey Sep 2013 #189
Nope! LibAsHell Sep 2013 #190
No Not Sure Sep 2013 #191
Just say NO !!!! SamKnause Sep 2013 #192
NO Warpy Sep 2013 #193
no DaveT Sep 2013 #194
Nope. FailureToCommunicate Sep 2013 #195
I think we should all adopt the peace sign avatar and call senseandsensibility Sep 2013 #196
No ChazInAz Sep 2013 #197
No, not now, no matter what. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #198
FUCKING HELL NO FFS! L0oniX Sep 2013 #200
Absolutely NO!!! thatgemguy Sep 2013 #201
Uh uh radiclib Sep 2013 #204
Just not no, but Unknown Beatle Sep 2013 #205
No. It stops now. Maven Sep 2013 #206
Helllllllllllllll No! Dash87 Sep 2013 #207
No. enlightenment Sep 2013 #209
NO. chocolate ink Sep 2013 #210
Nay. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #211
No. Ilsa Sep 2013 #212
Not just no but... Hubert Flottz Sep 2013 #213
NO, GODAMMIT. ancianita Sep 2013 #214
no no no no no no no no no no no! marble falls Sep 2013 #215
No. susanr516 Sep 2013 #216
Everything but this eissa Sep 2013 #217
NO 1monster Sep 2013 #218
N O NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! glinda Sep 2013 #219
No. PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #220
All I want to say is . . . radicalliberal Sep 2013 #221
No, but if they feel they need to do something, prosecuting Bush et al would be a nice start. n/t xocet Sep 2013 #222
Weighing in with my " NO," TinkerTot55 Sep 2013 #253
negatory, emphatic dougolat Sep 2013 #295
No Blue_In_AK Sep 2013 #223
Hell No!!! PADemD Sep 2013 #224
Stop the insanity. No! LibDemAlways Sep 2013 #225
NO !!!!!!! SaveOurDemocracy Sep 2013 #226
NO jimlup Sep 2013 #227
No to infinity and back! n/t dgibby Sep 2013 #228
NFW williesgirl Sep 2013 #229
No. JEB Sep 2013 #230
It was no during the Shrubs Phlem Sep 2013 #231
No gort Sep 2013 #232
Hell no. Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #233
NO. octoberlib Sep 2013 #234
No, no and a thousand times no! n/t markpkessinger Sep 2013 #235
shit, no. nt Nay Sep 2013 #236
No. Nothing "limited" will be effecive, and nothing effective will be "limited". JHB Sep 2013 #237
No. onestepforward Sep 2013 #238
No. Just, no. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #239
No harun Sep 2013 #240
How about a nice big hot cup of 'no'. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #241
No Brewinblue Sep 2013 #242
No. liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #243
I'm absolutely on-board with 'No' to this ill-conceived war. appal_jack Sep 2013 #244
No! Definitely a "no" here. n/t Turn CO Blue Sep 2013 #245
No Joe Shlabotnik Sep 2013 #247
I say no. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #249
No riderinthestorm Sep 2013 #250
No, no--a thousand times no!!!!!!!!! CoffeeCat Sep 2013 #251
Nope catchnrelease Sep 2013 #252
NO GrapesOfWrath Sep 2013 #254
Hell no! factsarenotfair Sep 2013 #255
No joelz Sep 2013 #256
No. Starry Messenger Sep 2013 #257
No. n/t cui bono Sep 2013 #258
NO proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #259
NO a 100 times no. We are not the world's judge, jury and executioner WillYourVoteBCounted Sep 2013 #260
No BillyRibs Sep 2013 #261
No. Safetykitten Sep 2013 #264
No surprise here Will..... Pachamama Sep 2013 #265
Our average was a war every 20 years. Apparently now it is one every 10 years. liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #268
NYET! That's a big no go. n/t JimDandy Sep 2013 #266
Peanut Butter SlipperySlope Sep 2013 #267
No... daleanime Sep 2013 #269
Absofuckinglutely NOT. liberalmuse Sep 2013 #270
absolutely NOT gblady Sep 2013 #271
No, no, no, no, no! Logical Sep 2013 #272
No! n/t Lugnut Sep 2013 #273
No. TDale313 Sep 2013 #274
No. mwdem Sep 2013 #275
absolutely no Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #276
Nein! defacto7 Sep 2013 #277
NO!!! Little Star Sep 2013 #278
Absolutely not. n/t proReality Sep 2013 #279
No n/t Oilwellian Sep 2013 #280
No donheld Sep 2013 #281
No. Marr Sep 2013 #282
no n/t Jeroen Sep 2013 #283
Hell No!!! TM99 Sep 2013 #284
Nuke Syria? blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #285
No Fíng Way Oldtimeralso Sep 2013 #287
No. n/t area51 Sep 2013 #288
No pasaran! NSA scandals and war on Syria have (finally) made DU BelgianMadCow Sep 2013 #289
No nolabels Sep 2013 #290
no n/t Speed8098 Sep 2013 #291
No... n/t Ichingcarpenter Sep 2013 #292
No, no,no,no! N_E_1 for Tennis Sep 2013 #293
NO! Spirochete Sep 2013 #296
De-lurking to say ... NO! The Traveler Sep 2013 #297
No Art_from_Ark Sep 2013 #298
NO! (& I'm tempted to cancel my IGNORE list to see how the bots desperately spin this) Divernan Sep 2013 #299
A'OLE mahina Sep 2013 #300
Nope . orpupilofnature57 Sep 2013 #301
And another NO! panader0 Sep 2013 #302
I say no. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #303
Hell No! rusty fender Sep 2013 #304
NO Are_grits_groceries Sep 2013 #306
No. Oakenshield Sep 2013 #307
No! spin Sep 2013 #308
No. nt lillypaddle Sep 2013 #309
No fracking way! Jasana Sep 2013 #310
No. raouldukelives Sep 2013 #311
No (n/t) bread_and_roses Sep 2013 #312
Not at the moment. Laelth Sep 2013 #313
no Chiquitita Sep 2013 #315
Signing on hermetic Sep 2013 #316
oofy poofy NOPE Agony Sep 2013 #317
No Phentex Sep 2013 #318
NO sulphurdunn Sep 2013 #320
No jumptheshadow Sep 2013 #321
No way, Jose. Glimmer of Hope Sep 2013 #322
No, Sir. KeepItReal Sep 2013 #323
Emphatic NO Celefin Sep 2013 #324
NO G_j Sep 2013 #325
Absolutely. Freakin' pink-o Sep 2013 #326
Hell no! n/t backscatter712 Sep 2013 #327
NO!!!! huckleberry Sep 2013 #328
NO! Lochloosa Sep 2013 #329
I found DU twelve years ago yellowwoodII Sep 2013 #330
No. But there is something that makes me happy -- TBF Sep 2013 #331
I say no. Transform and find new ways of dealing with these horrors, not bombs. n/t OneGrassRoot Sep 2013 #332
NO!!!! wavesofeuphoria Sep 2013 #333
No more. <nt> TommyCelt Sep 2013 #334
No Caretha Sep 2013 #335
NO to Big-Brother Government, Big-Brother Corporations and Big-Brother Religion. amb123 Sep 2013 #336
NO. alberg Sep 2013 #337
On the fence for quite a while... Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2013 #338
Negative. n/t reflection Sep 2013 #339
No. kiva Sep 2013 #340
No. PATRICK Sep 2013 #341
I just checked, it's a new day. I'm not skeptical, I'm still hell NO. Autumn Sep 2013 #343
NO. beerandjesus Sep 2013 #344
Yeah, no. lapislzi Sep 2013 #345
No. gtar100 Sep 2013 #346
NO Bertha Venation Sep 2013 #348
No. There should be an alternative. nt BumRushDaShow Sep 2013 #349
No n/t Mira Sep 2013 #350
No more war, killing & fighting. CrispyQ Sep 2013 #351
No. SalmonChantedEvening Sep 2013 #352
No, not again, never.nt pecwae Sep 2013 #353
NO in thunder! Generic Other Sep 2013 #354
No. NC_Nurse Sep 2013 #355
No. LiberalAndProud Sep 2013 #356
No, no, no, no, no, no, no! av8rdave Sep 2013 #359
No. grntuscarora Sep 2013 #360
An emphatic No! sarcasmo Sep 2013 #364
hell to the no, nein, nyet etc florida08 Sep 2013 #365
Absofrigginlutely... Veilex Sep 2013 #366
No to sticking our weenie into Syria. No to the NSA as Father Confessor kenny blankenship Sep 2013 #367
NO! Randomthought Sep 2013 #368
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!! GliderGuider Sep 2013 #371
Yes. truebrit71 Sep 2013 #372
lol...took some guts to say that florida08 Sep 2013 #374
Don't forget to post your description of 'humanitarian bombing' from the front lines. idwiyo Sep 2013 #378
Noparoo ! yesphan Sep 2013 #376
K&R No idwiyo Sep 2013 #377
No Cummins14 Sep 2013 #379
No. hamsterjill Sep 2013 #380
Nope! MNBrewer Sep 2013 #381
No. Myrina Sep 2013 #382
No! caseymoz Sep 2013 #383
No. A thousand times, NO! nt Granny M Sep 2013 #384
Not just no, but 'Oh HELL no'. marmar Sep 2013 #385
What part of NO don't they understand, the N or the O? SwankyXomb Sep 2013 #386
NO Maraya1969 Sep 2013 #387
Nyet CanonRay Sep 2013 #388
Not only no libodem Sep 2013 #389
Sign me up for a 'No'. Sentath Sep 2013 #390
No arikara Sep 2013 #391
No here. Liberal In Texas Sep 2013 #392
A big fuck no here too! BobbyBoring Sep 2013 #393
No. Too much for US to lose. Too many wars already. npk Sep 2013 #394
NO WHEN CRABS ROAR Sep 2013 #395
No gademocrat7 Sep 2013 #396
No. Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2013 #397
No way Catbird Sep 2013 #398
No Arugula Latte Sep 2013 #400
No! No! A thousand times No! Ganja Ninja Sep 2013 #401
No NewJeffCT Sep 2013 #402
Nay Da malokvale77 Sep 2013 #404
No Berlum Sep 2013 #405
No! bvar22 Sep 2013 #406
I'm against it! TlalocW Sep 2013 #407
In many languages: Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2013 #408
no, nopers, nada Ragrum Sep 2013 #409
Perpetual war? PrestonLocke Sep 2013 #410
'A'ole makemake! KamaAina Sep 2013 #411
no Faryn Balyncd Sep 2013 #412
NO NO NO NO mbuch64 Sep 2013 #413
Ok...William, I'll say no but if you're talking about "Would you like a Coconut Cream Pie" ? BlueJazz Sep 2013 #414
you sound like Ted Stevens. Or my 18 month old son. Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #415
Thanks for the kick. WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #421
Oh hell no. MichiganVote Sep 2013 #417
F/CK NO! blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #418
no, no, no onethatcares Sep 2013 #419
No way. onlyadream Sep 2013 #420
No, here. chervilant Sep 2013 #422
NO. And hopefully we've found a way out. calimary Sep 2013 #423
Respectfully, No. I disagree with the President, but I don't hate him like so many other DUers. Yavin4 Sep 2013 #424
Hell No! Jamastiene Sep 2013 #425
No! NealK Sep 2013 #426
NO RetroLounge Sep 2013 #427
STILL no, Hell or high water MisterP Sep 2013 #428

dickthegrouch

(3,175 posts)
403. The GOP says No all the time and we despise them
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:05 PM
Sep 2013

What's this "No" for?
If it's Syrian bombs, I can go along with it.
Generalized "No" is BAD BAD BAD

1awake

(1,494 posts)
342. I must say that every time you use the F word it startles me lol
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:06 AM
Sep 2013

I don't know why. Anyway... i say NO as well.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
5. HELL NO!
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:26 PM
Sep 2013

And I want Single Payer, Universal Health Care too! If we can afford $93 Billion to bomb some country we have a problem with, why can't we have a few comforts here at home?

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
208. Me too...
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 10:15 PM
Sep 2013

and I was about to dig up a photo and post, but KNEW someone else had beaten me to it. Or I guess I should say...

Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,007 posts)
30. Your defeatist post advocates that we all & everybody go silent. Wrong. Raise a voice & others join!
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:39 PM
Sep 2013

Anybody can be an opinion leader by writing cogent, thoughtful articles that hit home points thoroughly and convincingly. One voice like that can inspire thousands and millions. Obama and politicians pay attention to thousands and millions.

Writing like that is hard to do.

Much easier to bomb a thread with a nihilist post like yours that tries to urge us all to go home and shut up. Wrong place to push that line.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
33. Alas that's the problem
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:41 PM
Sep 2013

We are nominally still a representative democracy. It is Congress who should listen to citizens, vote this no.

No longer surprised some folks miss this.

 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
369. If it didn't matter,
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:53 AM
Sep 2013

Obama wouldn't bother trying to get congress or the American people on board.
But, he is, so it does.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
32. NO (And while I'm proud to stand with you and several other DUers whom I've come to respect ...
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:41 PM
Sep 2013

over the years; I've got to say that I don't enjoy siding with the some of the "Kerry's a LIAR", and Obama's a LIAR" crowd.) But fuck it, I'm just a broke down old ex-grunt, and THAT'S the fucking reason I don't wish to see any more American troops sent into the middle of someone else's Civil War. Been there ... done that ... no T-shirt, but I still have the occasional nightmare.

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
37. What, you got a problem with 'common sense'? Why, everyone who's anyone knows that it's
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:42 PM
Sep 2013

'common sense' that Assad gassed his own people:

The White House asserted Sunday that a “common-sense test” dictates the Syrian government is responsible for a chemical weapons attack that President Barack Obama says demands a U.S. military response. But Obama’s top aide says the administration lacks “irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence” that skeptical Americans, including lawmakers who will start voting on military action this week, are seeking.

“This is not a court of law. And intelligence does not work that way,” White House chief of staff Denis McDonough said during his five-network public relations blitz Sunday to build support for limited strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad.

“The common-sense test says he is responsible for this."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-working-to-rally-lawmakers-american-public-behind-obamas-push-for-syrian-strike/2013/09/08/66cfb932-1868-11e3-80ac-96205cacb45a_story.html

I swear you cannot make this shit up. Now pardon me while I go

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
43. With you Brother
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:46 PM
Sep 2013

BTW, I hope all is well with you and the fam. You are truly a good man Will... I appreciate seeing folks with your effect on the political landscape with integrity and honor. You walk the walk brother.

Pats game caused me to chew my fingers bare... THIS issue, is causing me to eat my fist and then puke it up again to start all over. I'm sick of it.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
69. Madame Chanel had a slogan.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:56 PM
Sep 2013

"Elegance is refusal"

and another

"The most courageous act is still to think for yourself"

Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

tavalon

(27,985 posts)
98. You think Will Pitt doesn't have them on speed dial
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:14 PM
Sep 2013

You might want to do a little research before you throw your cute and ineffectual barbs. I'd bet good money he's done far more than you for the peace movement and for a pretty long time. Read any of his books?

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
82. Fuuuuuuck no!
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:01 PM
Sep 2013

Enough with war already. How can you let our people suffer, our infrastructure crumble, and think that we can afford this, either fiscally or emotionally?

Grown2Hate

(2,013 posts)
83. It was a "NO!" from me with a Republican at the helm, and it's a "NO!" from me now with a
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:02 PM
Sep 2013

Democrat at the helm.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
84. No.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:03 PM
Sep 2013


''....and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.''

- K&R

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
88. I'm still trying to decide.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:08 PM
Sep 2013

I'm hung up between No, No Fucking Way, and Jesus Christ, are these would-be hotshots out of their collective mind?

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
101. Hvor bliver De? Måske Mågøyane?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:17 PM
Sep 2013

In any case, "not advisable" seems something of an understatement. I'd opt for "stupid," "insane" or "criminal."

raindaddy

(1,370 posts)
113. No!!!
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:31 PM
Sep 2013

The difference between Democrats and Republicans is Democrats won't back their president when he loses it. Remembering LBJ and Vietnam....

mike dub

(541 posts)
117. DU'er who's on here everyday, yet seldom comment unless I think I have something to really add
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:33 PM
Sep 2013

But, Hell NO!!!!!!
This has been all I've been thinking about: Hell NO!
(and I voted for President Obama twice, and have tried, and failed to see where the hell he's coming from with this.
Surreal...like everything's moving in bizarre slo-mo)

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
119. I wonder what
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:35 PM
Sep 2013

yall's responses will be when Assad uses another WMD on his people?

Many people are going to die in Syria whether it is "yes" or "no".

I got my money that "YES" will save many more lives over all !

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
203. If he gases his own people he will not give a shit if we bomb them.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 10:10 PM
Sep 2013

It will be a worthless act. No, a thousand times no to more war. I am sick of it. My entire life we have been at war with someone or the other in some way. Enough.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
246. What's your response going to be if the whatever is done is ineffective?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:35 PM
Sep 2013

Tell us what you want us to commit to. And tell us what you'll do if that's not enough.

Do you want a new Desert Storm? That would take care of the gas, though it will leave the mess of dealing with the rebel factions. You want that too?

I'm going to guess "not", so what lesser measure do you think we can get away with and still be effective? And what's Plan B if what you thought would be enough wasn't?



Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
314. Why do yall think that a GOP type response is the only response?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 06:10 AM
Sep 2013

First you give Assad a ultimatum: He has thirty days to destroy his stockpile of Chemical Weapons with UN verification , sign the Chemical Weapons Ban and turn himself in to the World Court for Trial .

If Those terms are not met, Let Assad know that he is marked man and that we will at the first opportunity use one our very small personal drones and fly it up his ass!

bullsnarfle

(254 posts)
347. Dude.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:22 AM
Sep 2013

So anybody that we are pissed off at, we now just assasinate them.

"America, leader of the free world".
Ha!
Make that "America, no better than a mob hit goon".

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
362. No,,,,
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:35 AM
Sep 2013

just people you use WDM's and refuse to quit.

So you think Assad should free range to use Wdm's at his pleasure. .....?

bullsnarfle

(254 posts)
399. So you think
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 02:47 PM
Sep 2013

our President should have free range to assassinate anyone he/she wants to, at their pleasure? Now THAT is a scary thought, pal. There is no guarantee that the next prez won't be a total nutcake, ya know. Hell, this drone crap is bad enough now as it is, how many "collateral" bystanders (incl. little kids, babies) are killed for every presumed bad guy? Lots, dude. Lots. But as long as you get a good chuckle out of Assad with a drone up his keester, well, it's all good, right?

As to the question of WMD's, does that mean it's ok by you to slaughter people with "conventional" weapons? So, if you kill 20 people with a "WMD", and 200 with bombs, are the bombed people somehow "less dead"? Not that I don't think WMD's are horrible, but so is a nutjob wielding an AK47 in a school full of kids, or a batch of white phosphorus, or a bunch of cluster bombs, and on and on it goes...

And why are you in such a god-awful RUSH to jump into the middle of this cluster-fux anyhow? Seems to me, if we had taken a little more time and checked out our shit a bit closer, we would not have had many thousands of our people dying/maimed-for-life in Iraq. Did you buy the "smoking gun/mushroom cloud" then? Why not? Wasn't it the same bunch of black-holers - CIA, NSA, m-o-u-s-e - (or close enough for a smell test) that shoveled up all the BS "intelligence" that Saddam had WMD's? Did you trust them then? If not, then why would you trust them now?

I don't.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
416. our President should have free range to assassinate anyone he/she wants to
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 05:11 PM
Sep 2013

NO. But WE should be able to deliver Assad's Justice when no other options are available, or any crazy asshole who is using WMD on people.


Words have meanings,,,, dont make up stuff and say i said it;

allowing Assad to bask in his "cheap grace" if no action is taken against him, will only lead to him using his WMD's again.

Welcome to the real world, not all problems have ideal solutions.

WE can deliver Justice to Assad with way fewer people dying than will die by his hands if left to continue his use of WMD

also Your logic is flawed by trying to associate Assad's wmd killings to some other acts of war or lone crazy people. But nice try at that fallacy.

btw..... by definition a weapon that only kills 20 people is not a WMD


Eventually you are unaware that Justice and Retribution are very Liberal concepts.

Somebody needs to stand up for Assad's present and future victims.

Thats Why i am in a hurry to get this done.

It is a shame that so many People who proclaim to be Liberals seem to be more concerned with Assad future than all the people he has and will kill with his WMD








JHB

(37,161 posts)
357. You use the term "GOP solution" when you propose "shock & awe for one"? Seriously?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:05 AM
Sep 2013

Considering that one of Syria's major potential military opponents for decades has been the Israeli Air Force, any place Assad goes will probably have active air defenses. That's going to be a flight environment that's a lot rougher on drones than remote areas of Pakistan.

Weapon of choice against al Qaeda, drones marginal in Syria
(Reuters) - Prowling the skies of Pakistan and Yemen, armed drones are America's weapon of choice in its war against al Qaeda, but they are unlikely to play a major role in any U.S. strike against Syria, underscoring the limitations of unmanned aircraft.

Drones do not have the capability for air-to-air combat and would be vulnerable to Syria's defense system of surface-to-air missiles and radar which can track and shoot down warplanes, never mind slower-moving drones.

The Hellfire missiles generally carried by drones also lack the firepower of a cruise missile, which is considered the likely weapon for any limited U.S. strike against President Bashar al-Assad's forces. Washington blames Assad's government for a chemical weapons attack near Damascus last month.

"It's well-known that the Syrian air defense system is robust," a U.S. defense official said. "Drones, like any other (aerial) platform, are vulnerable to integrated air defenses."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/04/us-syria-crisis-drones-idUSBRE98314C20130904


So the drones are likely to end up as so many clay pigeons without a "GOP solution" to eliminate Syrian air defenses. What's your Plan C? And Plan D. And so on, for each one, what will you do if the plan doesn't work. How far are you willing to ramp it up? When do you "that's enough" and stop. And what makes you think that once it gets rolling it can be stopped where you think it should end and not keep rolling because other groups are still pushing it along?

What I noted isn't a "GOP solution", it's one that can actually eliminate those chemical weapons so that Assad can't use them nor will they fall into the hands of radicals among the rebel groups. I'm not advocating it, I'm making sure you know that THAT is what you want to potentially get us into.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
361. WE have drones that so small
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:32 AM
Sep 2013

that the Syrian Air Defense is unable to detect them.

You are still thinking in GOP mind set!


btw.....Who said ""shock & awe for one"" not me please dont try to rewrite my post. I can fuck them up enough on my own, Thank you;.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
373. The problem with your argument is that you need to prove those drones can do that.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:11 AM
Sep 2013

If _Assad_ thinks he's safe from drones, then what demonstration do you propose to disabuse him of that notion?

And what do you propose if the demonstration doesn't work?

Also, if you don't care to have your posts "rewritten" with what you think is an unfair characterization, then how about you take your own advice and knock off with the "GOP strategy" and "GOP mindset" garbage.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
375. I am sure of very little
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:22 AM
Sep 2013

but i am sure that the USA can take Assad's last breath!

btw when you have to make up stuff and present them as something i said, you have run out of meaningful things to say.

So You dont think the GOP has/ have had strategies and mindset?

ummmmmm?



Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
124. No
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:38 PM
Sep 2013

The international community's energy and resources would be better spent helping the innocent non-combatants get out of harms way. I don't care how inconvenient relocating millions of refugees will be. It's never more inconvenient than war.

Get the innocents who want out out and let the two enemies of democracy waste their resources and fighters on themselves.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
127. OPPOSITE OF yes...
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:42 PM
Sep 2013

Everything that's being thrown at this tells me how wrong we are in this "what-ever-can-be-packaged" action.

It's high time we voiced in unison this "NO". We must know that the whole world has seen us lifting our skirt one too many times... Ain't nothing that should surprise anyone anymore of "what's up there"...

kath

(10,565 posts)
262. NO! And I agree that we should go back to calling it the Department of War
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:21 AM
Sep 2013

Been saying that for a while now. Such utter bullshit to call it the Defense Dept.

First Speaker

(4,858 posts)
176. *sigh* No
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 09:29 PM
Sep 2013

...I do not say this with relish. I don't like feeling that the US might lose prestige, that Obama will be humiliated, that the damned Repubs are on the right side of anything...and none of that matters. Avoiding this fiasco preempts everything else...

DaveT

(687 posts)
194. no
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 09:52 PM
Sep 2013

This is insane -- it comes presented as a futile gesture, a statement of disapproval by explosion. How can anybody really believe this is a good idea?

senseandsensibility

(17,066 posts)
196. I think we should all adopt the peace sign avatar and call
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 09:54 PM
Sep 2013

our congress critters. Count me as no. I hate this feeling of passivity that seems to have settled over our country. Have TBTB succeeded in dividing and conquering us? I have a very uneasy feeling...

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
212. No.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 10:16 PM
Sep 2013

And I have stayed out of all of these threads.

But I made up my mind pretty early: NO. No benefit, only more pain, heartache, expense.

eissa

(4,238 posts)
217. Everything but this
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 10:34 PM
Sep 2013

I've backed our party through it all: welfare reform, bailouts, health care compromises, spying, and a thousand broken promises. But this? Another war when we're supposedly "broke"? When we're slashing Head Start, Meals on Wheels, Planned Parenthood funding, when our infrastructure is crumbling, pensions raided, and our students are starting off life in debt?

NO. No more. This is MY red line.

TinkerTot55

(198 posts)
253. Weighing in with my " NO,"
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:52 PM
Sep 2013

and I'm in full agreement with xocet.

Time to hold people accountable, and LOCK THEM UP.

dougolat

(716 posts)
295. negatory, emphatic
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 04:31 AM
Sep 2013

But do prosecute those who slaughter civilians with chemical weapons.

(which would lead to Gaza and Falujah -oops!)

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
231. It was no during the Shrubs
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:05 PM
Sep 2013

it was no where ever we went since and it is fucking no now!

always will be "no", "no", "no", "no", "no", "no", "no", "no", "no"!

Fucking A! We so have more important things to do as a race of beings choking this earth than *Bombing the people who use bombs, bombing the bomb suppliers, bombing the nay sayer's when it comes to war, bombing the weather, and Santa, etc...!



Fuck!



-p

JHB

(37,161 posts)
237. No. Nothing "limited" will be effecive, and nothing effective will be "limited".
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:17 PM
Sep 2013

A missile strike just to "send a message" will obligate us to do even more late if it ends up being ineffective, which is very likely if the target isn't CW stockpiles and and it's not supposed to alter the balance of the civil war.

If a few months later there's another gas attack (and it won't matter if it's plain as day Assad's order, or if it's really muddy as to who actually made the attack) are we going to do nothing? Or will there be calls and pressure for new action: everything from "something must be done, we have to do more" to the dickswingers saying "he's thumbing his nose at us, if we don't do something we'll look like a paper tiger! Our credibility is on the line!"

Does anyone honestly think one missile strike will be the end of it?

If you think we MUST take military action because of the chemical weapon usage must not go unpunished, then that's an argument for something much bigger than anything being planned currently: something that will eliminate those chemical weapons so that they cannot be used by Assad nor by anyone else. And would entail ground forces, the effective destruction of Assad's regime, and dealing with the jihadis and other people that Assad used to keep a lid on through brutal suppression.

Think it through. If Plan A doesn't do the job, what's Plan B? And Plan C? Plan D? Plan E? Plan Q?
Think of what you really want to commit us to... and remember the it'd be very foolish to count on it stopping where you think it should.

So no.

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
244. I'm absolutely on-board with 'No' to this ill-conceived war.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:34 PM
Sep 2013

I'm absolutely on-board with 'No' to this ill-conceived war.

-app

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
247. No
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:37 PM
Sep 2013

*But, I say that as a Canadian, who like most Canadians don't support our opportunistic, chicken-hawk Prime Minister either.

WillYourVoteBCounted

(14,622 posts)
260. NO a 100 times no. We are not the world's judge, jury and executioner
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:04 AM
Sep 2013

there's this little thing called International Law. It protects us as much as it should restrain us.

Pachamama

(16,887 posts)
265. No surprise here Will.....
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:29 AM
Sep 2013

NO! Absolutely No fucking way! No. No. No. No.

I am just in shock that 10 years after we were out there saying No, after all that has happened, that we would have to be saying it, but that we have to be saying it to Barack Obama....

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
289. No pasaran! NSA scandals and war on Syria have (finally) made DU
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:52 AM
Sep 2013

resemble what it was when I joined: a board of pretty awake & critical thinking people.

It's like people are waking up left, right and center. I get the same feeling on this side of the pond.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
290. No
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 04:05 AM
Sep 2013

But Maybe we should go all in and just say YES!

Somehow it seems those placed in charged in government as of late, seem to have this major bug up their ass. Both of the supposedly liberal democratic senators in my state of California are in support of Obama on any actions in Syria.

Congress is only slightly more liked and believed in than any supposedly needed military action in Syria. The way I think of it is like we are now in the twilight zone and most population must be crazy. For more people to believe in space Aliens than the inevitable increased military action in Syria tells me not to expect any mass awareness anytime soon

On edit: This is perfect example why that even if someone believes in something does not always make it so. What it kind of looks like to me is just the wormy direction that the 1% opposition readies it's population for it's imperial way

 

The Traveler

(5,632 posts)
297. De-lurking to say ... NO!
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 04:37 AM
Sep 2013

I'm aboard. I do not consent to this. I didn't consent to Iraq, either, so it is evident that I have no influence on these matters. But if enough climb aboard ... perhaps we can avert this mess.

With ya, Will.

Trav

<lurk mode=on>

mahina

(17,668 posts)
300. A'OLE
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 04:53 AM
Sep 2013

ʻaʻole [Hawaiian Dictionary (Hwn to Eng)]
interj. No, not, never; to be none, to have none, -un. Commonly pronounced ʻaʻale (Gram. 2.7). Cf. ʻaʻohe. ʻA ʻole loa! Certainly not! Not at all! I should say not! Never!

yellowwoodII

(616 posts)
330. I found DU twelve years ago
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:48 AM
Sep 2013

Lost my password once, had to start over. I got a little weary of DU when it seemed to me that it diverged off of anti-war themes. I never forgot that the PNAC never sleeps.

So, no. No. No.

TBF

(32,067 posts)
331. No. But there is something that makes me happy --
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:03 AM
Sep 2013

We may have to endure the trolls in certain *ahem* groups (I can think of two primary groups that are filled with them), and we have to endure the mounds of blue ink from the folks with the *official* line ...

but at least there are 300 people on here who will stand on principle and let our party know when they are going in the wrong direction.

amb123

(1,581 posts)
336. NO to Big-Brother Government, Big-Brother Corporations and Big-Brother Religion.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:47 AM
Sep 2013

NO to unnecessary wars of aggression, whether they be "full scale" or "limited".
NO to the destruction of the Social Safety Net.
NO to the destruction of the Separation of Church and State.
NO to the destruction of our Voting Rights.
NO to politicians who are either power-mad, brain-dead, bought off or all three.

PATRICK

(12,228 posts)
341. No.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:04 AM
Sep 2013

I'm reviewing all the other call to arms over my lifetime(all post Korean war). It is getting really pathetic I guess because they really don't care what we think anyway. The excitement, the moral issue debate, the closeted evidence, is just chokingly obscene, the information a drumbeat tease, the goals a sick joke.

Pretty much in the style of fighting for voting integrity for the CIA candidate in the Ukraine while the US Canada and Mexico defrauded their voters. I have about ten issues we could debate that would save the planet, the nation, democracy, people, you know those more important things that don't involve murdering someone for points in a country that has nothing really to do with us. It would even be new to involve the UN etc. to establish rules to go after heads of state that commit war crimes, murder their own people. The current debate? Just petty and sick. Right up Congress's alley.

CrispyQ

(36,478 posts)
351. No more war, killing & fighting.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:43 AM
Sep 2013

We're all in this together & if we don't come to realize that, we are all going into the dustbin of history together.


I sent my third email to my senators/rep this morning & I will call again when their offices open. Make your voice heard. I've told my reps that this is a deal breaker. Anyone who votes yes on attacking Syria will not get my vote in 2014. I changed my affiliation to Greens about 6 weeks ago. The dems keep asking, "Who else you gonna vote for?" Well, the Greens, perhaps. Dem leadership continues to drift further & further to the right but wants my loyalty. Not anymore. They have played me for the fool long enough. Voting for the lesser of two evils has gotten me exactly what I didn't want in the first place.

av8rdave

(10,573 posts)
359. No, no, no, no, no, no, no!
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:22 AM
Sep 2013

I can't even imagine all the people and entities whispering in his ear, but the President needs to have the courage, resolve and humility to not listen.

florida08

(4,106 posts)
365. hell to the no, nein, nyet etc
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:43 AM
Sep 2013

Doing this will deeply hurt American credibility again and Obama will be seen as the 2nd George Bush.

From McClatchy Foreign Staff

Intercepts caught Assad rejecting requests to use chemical weapons, German paper says


Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/09/09/4468268/intercepts-caught-assad-rejecting.html#storylink=cpy

 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
366. Absofrigginlutely...
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:46 AM
Sep 2013

No way, no how.

And in 61 other languages:


1
Nee - Afrikaans

2
Jo - Albanian

3
La - Arabic

4
Voch’ - Armenian

5
Deyil - Azerbaijani

6
Ez - Basque

7
Nie - Belarusian

8
Ne - Bosnian

9
Ne - Bulgarian

10
No - Catalan

11
Bù - Chinese

12
Ne - Croatian

13
Ne - Czech

14
Nej - Danish

15
Nee - Dutch

16
No - English

17
Ei - Estonian

18
Hindi - Filipino

19
Ei - Finnish

20
Non - French

21
Non - Galician

22
Ara - Georgian

23
Nein - German

24
Den - Greek

25
Pa - Haitian Creole

26
Lo - Hebrew

27
Nahi - Hindi

28
Nem - Hungarian

29
Nei - Icelandic

30
Tidak - Indonesian

31
Ni - Irish

32
No - Italian

33
Nai - Japanese

34
Aniyo - Korean

35
Non - Latin

36
Ne - Latvian

37
Ne - Lithuanian

38
Ne - Macedonian

39
Tidak - Malay

40
Ma - Maltese

41
Nei - Norwegian

42
Na - Persian (Farsi)

43
Nie - Polish

44
Não - Portuguese

45
Nu - Romanian

46
Niet - Russian

47
Ne - Serbian

48
Naha/Na - Sinhalese

49
Ne - Slovak

50
Ne - Slovenian

51
No - Spanish

52
Hapana - Swahili

53
Nej - Swedish

54
Illai - Tamil

55
Naaku Vaddu (I don't want) Naaku Akkaraledu/Avasaram ledu(I don't need) - Telugu

56
Mai - Thai

57
Hayır - Turkish

58
Nei - Ukrainian

59
Không - Vietnamese

60
Nid oes - Welsh

61
Illa - Malayalam

62
No - Jamaica

http://www.wikihow.com/Say-No-in-Various-Languages

If I thought it'd help, I'd upload a video of me signing "no".

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
367. No to sticking our weenie into Syria. No to the NSA as Father Confessor
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:48 AM
Sep 2013

No to letting intelligence officials embark on sprees of perjury in their testimony before Congress. No to letting banksters get off free after destroying our system of property registration and stealing billions and billions of dollars of real estate. No to a policy of giving the aforesaid banksters billions and billions of free money to "invest" in the stock market while the real economy languishes and crumbles and wages erode from the effects of the same banksters bidding up the price of basic commodities like food and petroleum in a speculative spiral fueled with their interest free dough. No to a scheme of rent extraction and profiteering enforced at government gunpoint, masquerading as universal health care. No to doubling and tripling down in Afghanistan. No to repeatedly extending tax cuts for the rich while coming up with artificial gimmicks to create a series of OMYGODWERERUNNINGOUTOFMONEY!!11!! fiscal crises. No to letting war criminals retire to bask in the fruits of their crime without fear of deportation to the Hague. No to repeated attempts to cut Social Security below their already inadequate levels. NO, NO and RE-NO. FUCK ALL OF THAT REPUBLICAN SHIT.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
372. Yes.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:09 AM
Sep 2013

Very Reluctantly.

I just don't think we can sit idly by and watch the use of chemical weapons go unpunished, otherwise what was the point of signing the chemical weapons ban all those years ago?

Am I happy about it, hell no, but it simply cannot stand.

I shall now put on my flame-proof suit.

Cummins14

(6 posts)
379. No
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:01 PM
Sep 2013

If there is a war, then obama AND all the legislators who voted for the war, SHOULD be impeached along with obama.

npk

(3,660 posts)
394. No. Too much for US to lose. Too many wars already.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 01:23 PM
Sep 2013

We should let the international community handle this, even though they are probably going to fail miserably.

TlalocW

(15,384 posts)
407. I'm against it!
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:56 PM
Sep 2013

I don't know what they have to say,
It makes no difference anyway,
Whatever it is, I'm against it.
No matter what it is or who commenced it,
I'm against it.

Your proposition may be good,
But let's have one thing understood,
Whatever it is, I'm against it.
And even when you've changed it or condensed it,
I'm against it.

I'm opposed to it,
On general principle, I'm opposed to it.

For months before my son was born,
I used to yell from night to morn,
Whatever it is, I'm against it.
And I've kept yelling since I first commenced it,
I'm against it!

TlalocW

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
408. In many languages:
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:58 PM
Sep 2013

AFRIKAANS nee
ALBANIAN jo
ALSATIAN naï
ARABIC laa
ARMENIAN votch
AZERI xeyir
BASQUE ez
BELARUSIAN Не (nie)
BENGALI na
BOBO aïlle
BOSNIAN ne
BRETON nann
BULGARIAN né
BURMESE ma hoke phu / hmar te
CATALAN no
CHEROKEE tla / hla
CHINESE pù shi
CORSICAN nò
CZECH ne
CROATIAN ne
DANISH nej
DUTCH nee
ENGLISH no
ESPERANTO ne
ESTONIAN ei
FAROESE nei
FINNISH ei
FRENCH non
FRISIAN nee
FRIULAN no
GALICIAN non
GALLO nanni
GEORGIAN ara
GERMAN nein
GREEK ohi
GUARANÍ nahániri
HAITIAN CREOLE non
HAWAIIAN ʻaole
HEBREW lo
HINDI nahin
HUNGARIAN nem
ICELANDIC nei
INDONESIAN tidak
ITALIAN no
JAPANESE iié
KABYLIAN ala
KHMER thay
KINYARWANDA oya
KOREAN ahneo
KURDISH no / na
LAO bo
LATIN minime (not at all), non (and repetition of the verb)
LATVIAN nē
LIGURIAN no
LINGALA te
LITHUANIAN ne
LOW SAXON nee
LUXEMBOURGEOIS neen
MACEDONIAN не (ne)
MALAGASY tsia
MALAY tidak
MALTESE le
MAORI kaore
MONGOLIAN ugui (Yгvй
NORWEGIAN nei
OCCITAN non
OSSETIAN нæй
PAPIAMENTU no
PERSIAN kheyr / na
POLISH nie
PORTUGUESE não
ROMANI na
ROMANIAN nu
RUSSIAN Нет (niet)
SARDINIAN no
SCOTTISH GAELIC ag
SERBIAN ne
SHONA aiwa
SINDHI na
SINHALA nae
SLOVAK nie
SLOVENIAN ne
SOBOTA ne
SONINKE aï
SPANISH no
SWAHILI siyo / hapana
SWEDISH nej
TAGALOG hindi (po)
TAHITIAN aita
TAMAZIGHT lla
TAMIL illaï
TATAR yuk
TELUGU kadhu
THAI ไม่ (maï) / ไม่ใช่ (maï chaï)
TURKISH hayir
UDMURT oevoel (with nouns) / ug (with verbs)
UKRAINIAN Ні (ni)
URDU نهين (nahin)
WALOON ("betchfessîs" spelling) neni
WELSH nage
WEST INDIAN CREOLE awa
WOLOF déedéet
YIDDISH nein
YORUBA rara
ZULU cha

mbuch64

(55 posts)
413. NO NO NO NO
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 04:54 PM
Sep 2013

and again, no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
414. Ok...William, I'll say no but if you're talking about "Would you like a Coconut Cream Pie" ?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 05:02 PM
Sep 2013

I'll gonna' be really Pissed.

Yavin4

(35,441 posts)
424. Respectfully, No. I disagree with the President, but I don't hate him like so many other DUers.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 10:14 AM
Sep 2013

Clinton did a ton more shit than Obama did, and I still loved him as president.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No.