DU'ers who saw the Latest Batch of Gruesome Videos--Do you think they are totally Authentic??
I haven't seen the latest batch that were released to convince us about the atrocities in Syria because I don't like to see really graphic stuff. I've seen the other videos around that were released and some of them didn't look real to me. Maybe if they'd had some info with a narrator or something saying where they were from, I could have thought they looked more authentic. But, some of them...seemed photo-shopped or edited in a way that didn't reveal or obscured what the environment around the scene was, context of what bystanders or observers were doing and WHO the person taking the photo or video might have been.
Don't get me wrong....I'm not saying that CW weren't used in Syria...but, I wonder why there aren't interviews with those who photographed or video taped these incidents that are available from either Reporters and Observers on the Scene or News Organizations, NGO's, Hospital Employees or others who have given testimony of dates and who they are so that we can verify timelines and authenticate if these are from the August 21st attack or are from other gassings and incidents that may have happened earlier or even in other countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen which might have been incorporated into what our Senate Intelligence Committee Members were shown and even the ones released to the MSM this weekend by an overly zealous CIA/Pentagon/Security Agency.
I don't watch much MSM -- CNN/MSNBC or Networks...so I might have missed discussions over how the Videos/Photographs were verified and interviews with those who taped or took photos...so that there is more than just the running background behind a commentator which is pretty much all I've seen in the little I watch.
Does anyone else have questions about these latest Videos? 
= new reply since forum marked as read
I agree some of the photos (not the recent that I haven't seen) seems to show they were hit with Something...but there just isn't any CONTEXT.
In this day and age and sophistication of Internet Users ...it begs question that there WOULDN'T be questions about the first release they did.
There's just no CONTEXT of the GASSING:
And as your say:
"I also question reviving Sarin victims with water. Injections of 2-PAM-Cl or Atropine yes. Water, no. Water and detergent remove it from skin. Clothing also needs to be removed ASAP and the person scrubbed, not just flushed with water."
It seems just "You Tubes" were thrown out there by Administration with Kerry (seeming so cool saying Social Media Verifies) that we would all just accept that what's on "YOU TUBE" and FACEBOOK with Photos on your "LIKES" would pass for WHY we would do an AIR ASSAULT on SYRIA ...with few Questions Asked.
It just doesn't make sense.
...not like anything most people have seen. Dead people almost look like wax mannequins. If the only place you have seen a dead body is on TV, then most likely you have never actually seen a real dead body.
Funerals are different because an effort is made to use makeup to make the body look 'alive'.
Real death looks... not really fake, but it has a cognitive dissonance that makes it appear unreal. Unfortunately, we are getting many examples of what real dead bodies look like.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pallor_mortis
Pallor mortis (Latin: pallor "paleness", mortis "of death"
is a post mortem paleness which happens in those with light/white skin almost instantly (in the 15–25 minutes after the death) because of a lack of capillary circulation throughout the body.[1] The blood sinks down into the lower parts (due to gravity) of the body creating livor mortis.
