General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite Privilege On Steroids. Smith College Alum's Letter "Too Many Lesbians and Women of Color"
TUE FEB 28, 2012 AT 10:59 AM PST
White Privilege On Steroids. Smith College Alum's Letter "Too Many Lesbians and Women of Color"
byVita BrevisFollow
.............
Anne, a Smith alum (Class of '84) is quite undone about her alma mater's current desirability as the college of choice for students in her social circle. I'm going to print Anne's letter to the college paper in its entirety. I believe it complies with fair use standards since it's a letter, and has been published in its entirety several other places.
I am the president of the Smith Club of Westchester County. I enjoy reading the Sophian online because it helps me stay abreast of developments at the school.
...................................
The people who are attending Smith these days are A) lesbians or B) international students who get financial aid or C) low-income women of color who are the first generation in their family to go to college and will go to any school that gives them enough money. Carol emphasizes that this is one of her goals, and so that's why the school needs more money for scholarships or D) white heterosexual girls who can't get into Ivy League schools.
Smith no longer looks at SATs because if it did, it would have to report them to U.S. News & World Report. Low-income black and Hispanic students generally have lower SATs than whites or Asians of any income bracket. This is an acknowledged fact because they don't have access to expensive prep classes or private tutors.
To accomplish President Christ's mission of diversity, the school is underweighting SAT scores. This phenomenon has been widely discussed in the New York Times Education section. If you reduce your standards for grades and scores, you drop in the rankings, although you have accomplished a noble social objective. Smith has one of the highest diversity rates in the country.
I can tell you that the days of white, wealthy, upper-class students from prep schools in cashmere coats and pearls who marry Amherst men are over. This is unfortunate because it is this demographic that puts their name on buildings, donates great art and subsidizes scholarships.
-Anne Spurzem '84
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/28/1069113/-White-Privilege-On-Steroids-Smith-College-Alum-s-Letter-Too-Many-Lesbians-and-Women-of-Color-?via=siderec
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)those days. Holyoke was founded by a feminist of her day and age. My daughter was proud of that. She and her friends were strong feminists and certainly not snobs like Anne.
I have friends who went to Smith and they are older than Anne but not one bit like her...the poor dear is stuck in her little time warp and miserable. UGH...
elleng
(131,102 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)I'm not sure what her point is, overtly or otherwise, since she admits that the days of yore are "over". She laments that they are over, but it isn't exactly clear what she thinks should be different. She already admits they're only getting "...girls who can't geinto Ivy League Schools". Maybe she thinks they could, if they'd stop lowering score requirements, but I'm dubious that they can achieve that. Smith, like many (but not all) predominately/formerly all womens schools struggle in that "in between" world of Ivy League and State University. It's a tough niche and many if not most aren't doing that well.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Yet she is upset because other rich mommies and daddies can't buy their children into college any more. Hmmm interesting. To me that really is what her complaint is about.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)I'd share this with a colleague who's a recent Smith alum...but if she hasn't already read it, it will make her head explode, and I am rather fond of her, having mentored her since graduation.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Were there women on the sports teams who were lesbians? Sure. Were there women on the hockey teams who were straight? Of course. Did it matter? Of course not. My daughter roomed with one team member who was a lesbian. Did she attack her? Absolutely not. In fact, she knew my older daughter was also a lesbian and was very comfortable with the fact that both her teammate, and family, accepted their family member for who she was. Did her teammate try to "recruit" her to the gay "lifesyle"? INSANE.
Gays are not recruited, they are born that way from birth. People need to understand, and ACCEPT, this fact. Until society does, and the younger generation generally has less of a problem, discrimination will not be eradicated.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)some gay friends in her group, hockey team or no, and she doesn't care.
good lord.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)There are so many like her in Westchester County, particularly the wealthier towns. There's a reason I no longer live there.
randome
(34,845 posts)Even Republicans wouldn't be that blatant.
Initech
(100,102 posts)lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Thanks to my daughter for pointing that out. I was too busy seeing red to notice.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)With any luck, the members can vote this racist, homophobic elitist out for bringing the name of Smith into disrepute.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)Damare kono baka yaro! Goman na hitoga kirada. Neboken Ja neyo.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)http://jezebel.com/5889034/smith-alums-nasty-letter-was-not-meant-for-your-uncultured-eyes/
Remember that letter Anne Spurzem wrote to her alma mater, Smith College, lamenting that "white, wealthy, upper-class students from prep schools in cashmere coats and pearls" were giving way to poor lesbians of color? Well, now she says we were never supposed to read it.