Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThey aren't even asking for an estimate
Somehow, there's always money for endless war
I haven't heard much concern about the cost of this Syrian operation which is kind of surprising since the last four years has been a non-stop barrage of rhetoric about the need to cut government spending, from members of both parties. We've had epic unemployment (much of it driven by government cutbacks), proposals from a democratic president to cut social security benefits, credit downgrades, and a brutal sequestration process that is resulting in painful cuts all over the country. But the only person I've seen even question the cost of a new military operation is Congressman Alan Grayson. Note the cavalier way Secretary Hagel dismisses the concern:
48% of newborn Americans are considered to be in or near poverty. We're cutting food stamps.
But when it comes to the cost of yet another misbegotten military operation halfway around the world, which even the proponents acknowledge is nothing more than a symbolic gesture, we don't even ask for an estimate.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/they-arent-even-asking-for-estimate.html
Grayson: "Secretary Hagel, will the military action in Syria, if it does take place, require a supplemental appropriation and, if you think not, then will you commit to that not?"
Hagel: Well, it depends on the option that the president would select. I have said that we will work with the Congress on whatever the cost of that is."
I'm going to guess that it won't be a problem getting supplemental money for this should it be necessary.
48% of newborn Americans are considered to be in or near poverty. We're cutting food stamps.
But when it comes to the cost of yet another misbegotten military operation halfway around the world, which even the proponents acknowledge is nothing more than a symbolic gesture, we don't even ask for an estimate.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/they-arent-even-asking-for-estimate.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 847 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They aren't even asking for an estimate (Original Post)
phantom power
Sep 2013
OP
Hydra
(14,459 posts)1. That would have to mean all the austerity arguments were bull
Because we have plenty for this...Fancy that...
Catherina
(35,568 posts)2. Arab countries (meaning Qatar & Saudi) are going to pick up the tab. We're renting out our military
Secretary of State John Kerry said at Wednesdays hearing that Arab counties have offered to pay for the entirety of unseating President Bashar al-Assad if the United States took the lead militarily.
With respect to Arab countries offering to bear costs and to assess, the answer is profoundly yes, Kerry said. They have. That offer is on the table.
Asked by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) about how much those countries would contribute, Kerry said they have offered to pay for all of a full invasion.
In fact, some of them have said that if the United States is prepared to go do the whole thing the way weve done it previously in other places, theyll carry that cost, Kerry said. Thats how dedicated they are at this. Thats not in the cards, and nobodys talking about it, but theyre talking in serious ways about getting this done.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics-live/liveblog/the-houses-syria-hearing-live-updates/#e68f139f-e012-476c-876e-2467ba30e5e3
With respect to Arab countries offering to bear costs and to assess, the answer is profoundly yes, Kerry said. They have. That offer is on the table.
Asked by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) about how much those countries would contribute, Kerry said they have offered to pay for all of a full invasion.
In fact, some of them have said that if the United States is prepared to go do the whole thing the way weve done it previously in other places, theyll carry that cost, Kerry said. Thats how dedicated they are at this. Thats not in the cards, and nobodys talking about it, but theyre talking in serious ways about getting this done.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics-live/liveblog/the-houses-syria-hearing-live-updates/#e68f139f-e012-476c-876e-2467ba30e5e3
The US Military turned into mercenaries for Arab dictators.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)4. That's Wickedly True!
the pic that is.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)3. "WHATEVER it takes" is usually the rule of thumb
when it comes to bombing the shit out of another nation that is.
Feeding hungry, housing homeless, educating youth? .. not so much.