ROLL CALL on Senate Foreign Relations Committee Vote (AUMF)

[alcibiades_mystery]

YEA
Menendez (D)
Boxer (D)
Cardin (D)
Shaheen (D)
Coons (D)
Durbin (D)
Kaine (D)
Corker (R)
Flake(R)
McCain (R)

NAY
Udall (D)
Murphy (D)
Risch (R)
Rubio (R)
Johnson (R)
Barrasso (R)
Paul (R)

PRESENT
Markey (D)

[HERVEPA]

1. Boxer Yea?

[alcibiades_mystery]

2. Yes...Boxer voted yes

She signaled fairly clearly yesterday that she was a yea vote on the resolution in Committee.

[avaistheone1]

3. Amazing! Crap. I worked my ass off for her during her first campaign.

One of the glimmers of hope in Washington has sold out.

FY Babs!!!

[Dems to Win]

8. My heart is broken.

I've contributed more money to Sen. Boxer than any other politician on Earth. Never expected to feel this disappointed in her.

[joeybee12]

4. Boxer isn't really a surprise considering her "questions" yesterday...

A major disappointment, but not a surprise. Can she be primaried?

[HERVEPA]

5. What? You think you're going to get someone more liberal than she is generally

Intelligent people, including many liberals, do disagrree on how or whether to respond.

[joeybee12]

7. I basically like her, campaigned for her when I lived in CA...

But this isn't just a single vote, this is indicative that she really has lost touch with the people she represents...and exists, like most of them do, in a Washington vacuum...she needs at least to bes enta message, most of those shmucks do.

[backscatter712]

6. Well, Tom Udall voted correctly.

And of course, the Republicans voted correctly, but for the wrong reasons, I imagine.

[Supersedeas]

9. now we know