Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 05:48 AM Sep 2013

Cleveland kidnapper Ariel Castro found hanged in prison cell

http://touch.latimes.com/#tsection/-1/article/p2p-77265984/

"BY MATT PEARCE
September 4, 2013, 1:10 a.m.
Ariel Castro, the man who has been sentenced to life in prison for holding three Cleveland women captive for roughly a decade before their rescue this year, was found hanged in his cell and is believed to have committed suicide, Ohio officials said.

Castro, 53, was found in his cell at the Correctional Reception Center in Orient Tuesday evening, a prison spokeswoman told the Associated Press. He was pronounced dead at a hospital."


A coward to the end.
127 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cleveland kidnapper Ariel Castro found hanged in prison cell (Original Post) riqster Sep 2013 OP
~ In_The_Wind Sep 2013 #1
The LBN thread Kolesar Sep 2013 #2
We are liberals; we should not celebrate this man's death. Th1onein Sep 2013 #4
“I've never killed a man, but I've read many an obituary with a great deal of satisfaction.” hobbit709 Sep 2013 #6
He wasn't a man. He was a coward. A rapist. Ilsa Sep 2013 #7
And the Jews that the Nazis gassed were nothing but vermin, too, right? Th1onein Sep 2013 #34
That's a bullshit comparison, and you know it. Ilsa Sep 2013 #37
Dehumanization of another human being is dehumanization, any way you cut it. Th1onein Sep 2013 #120
And you dehumanized his victims Ilsa Sep 2013 #123
I said NOTHING about his victims, except that I'm sure they would rather him face justice. Th1onein Sep 2013 #127
Wow. What the fuck! HappyMe Sep 2013 #39
But she will call women who have had abortions "murderers" REP Sep 2013 #41
Really? HappyMe Sep 2013 #43
Really. REP Sep 2013 #54
Amazing. HappyMe Sep 2013 #62
Yes, she is staunchly anti-abortion and believes liberalhistorian Sep 2013 #82
Thanks for that insight JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #86
I'm just dumbfounded. HappyMe Sep 2013 #88
Thank you. Somehow, I missed Ilsa Sep 2013 #105
WHO on this thread is expressing sympathy for Castro? lapislzi Sep 2013 #69
Well-put, I do agree with that. liberalhistorian Sep 2013 #90
Thanks. What we're never, ever going to see here, is justice. lapislzi Sep 2013 #92
You must have replied to the wrong person REP Sep 2013 #104
My bad, sorry. lapislzi Sep 2013 #109
I was on the jury... bunnies Sep 2013 #84
I thought it was a slam dunk for over-the-top Ilsa Sep 2013 #106
Me too. bunnies Sep 2013 #110
We are all victims of something, or someone, Ilsa. Compassion for the least of us Th1onein Sep 2013 #117
if this is only about grave dancing i can totally back you. but, your post compared innocent people seabeyond Sep 2013 #124
Seabeyond, my post compared the DEHUMANIZATION of one person to the Th1onein Sep 2013 #125
No, but the Nazis who commited those crimes were scumbuckets. riqster Sep 2013 #53
I don't believe in the death penalty. I think it lowers us as a society and as human beings. Th1onein Sep 2013 #118
Poor comparison, as others have pointed out. richmwill Sep 2013 #56
Godwin's Law so early in the thread? lapislzi Sep 2013 #64
First of all, that is the most ridiculous, asinine, inane, liberalhistorian Sep 2013 #77
Jesus Fucking Christ on a cracker. cliffordu Sep 2013 #79
It was alerted on, but Ilsa Sep 2013 #107
Hmm... Send me a copy will ya?? cliffordu Sep 2013 #108
i wanna see. nt seabeyond Sep 2013 #122
Wow. zappaman Sep 2013 #98
ya. i am going to have to say.... pretty damn disgusting. dont you feel any shame? nt seabeyond Sep 2013 #116
Well said LordGlenconner Sep 2013 #66
On the other hand, should the patient weep when the tumor is excised? Buns_of_Fire Sep 2013 #9
Sorry, but we are better than grave dancers. Th1onein Sep 2013 #35
You must have forgotten he caused one of his victims to miscarry repeatedly REP Sep 2013 #42
!! Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #45
But beating, torturing, starving a woman until she miscarries = all is forgiven REP Sep 2013 #58
Kinda sounds that way, doesn't it? Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #65
Oh, SNAP! liberalhistorian Sep 2013 #83
No, not dancing. Not mourning, either. Just glad he's gone for good. Buns_of_Fire Sep 2013 #71
Agreed. Ilsa Sep 2013 #111
You aren't in a position to know what his death did or did not do, are you? Th1onein Sep 2013 #119
I like to think of his suicide as beneficial erosion. aikoaiko Sep 2013 #47
I don't celebrate Scootaloo Sep 2013 #126
Hannibal just couldn't resist. BootinUp Sep 2013 #3
That saved us taxpayers a lot of money! B Calm Sep 2013 #5
That was my first thought. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #8
He couldn't take a dose of his own medicine liberal N proud Sep 2013 #10
That was my first thought. LisaLynne Sep 2013 #11
somebody messed up to allow Castro to commit suicide ..... Botany Sep 2013 #12
Not jumping for joy vankuria Sep 2013 #13
my first thought was what a whimp Heather MC Sep 2013 #14
Shame on the prison system! perdita9 Sep 2013 #15
If I were a victim of violent crime noamnety Sep 2013 #16
You would, but it wouldn't be what you expect. WCLinolVir Sep 2013 #26
yup. magical thyme Sep 2013 #31
Isn't it amazing?? WCLinolVir Sep 2013 #40
Prisons are extremely understaffed amuse bouche Sep 2013 #21
I can agree with your sense of outrage but... Swede Atlanta Sep 2013 #25
Agreed. Also, this is part of the reason the death penalty was reinstated in Texas. freshwest Sep 2013 #33
He was in protective custody, not on suicide watch. riqster Sep 2013 #27
the only way to prevent it Niceguy1 Sep 2013 #30
baloney. his 3 victims probably are able to breathe again for the first time in a decade plus magical thyme Sep 2013 #32
He wasn't considered a risk Renew Deal Sep 2013 #52
He indicated at his sentencing that he wanted visitation rights with the daughter Tanuki Sep 2013 #17
That was fast Catherine Vincent Sep 2013 #18
I just don't care. HappyMe Sep 2013 #19
He didn't suffer nearly enough. backscatter712 Sep 2013 #20
going sci-fi? maybe easier to achieve with VR... 0rganism Sep 2013 #115
I have mixed emotions...... Swede Atlanta Sep 2013 #22
An obvious suicide Orrex Sep 2013 #23
Gallows humor, in the most literal sense. Nt riqster Sep 2013 #29
Good riddance to bad rubbish... Woof_Woof Sep 2013 #24
Ohio taxpayers just saved $45,000 per year for who knows how long. Octafish Sep 2013 #28
Why did they accept a plea in a case in which the accused was so obviously guilty? Romulox Sep 2013 #36
He was NOT under a suicide watch. He was simply in protective custody. Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #46
He was being checked every 30 minutes. Romulox Sep 2013 #48
Well, you don't really have to 'bite' anything. Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #49
I was under the misapprehension that rape was considered a "capital" crime. I withdraw that Romulox Sep 2013 #50
Not every prisoner is checked at the same intervals riqster Sep 2013 #59
I guess the cascading logic is this: if you're being checked, you're being checked for SOMETHING... Romulox Sep 2013 #63
Not everyone in PC is a suicide risk. riqster Sep 2013 #67
Castro was obviously a suicide risk. Romulox Sep 2013 #70
And you got your medical and psychology degrees where, exactly? riqster Sep 2013 #72
He killed himself. Logically, that means he was a suicide risk. Romulox Sep 2013 #73
By your logic, anyone facing a life term should be classified a suicide risk, Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #76
No, not "anyone". But infamous criminals serving 1000 year sentences? Romulox Sep 2013 #94
Your syllogism fails, as do so many, because of an underlying premise. riqster Sep 2013 #81
Well, for starters, it's not a syllogism... nt Romulox Sep 2013 #93
BTW, I never said that "his suicide risk was obvious". I said it is now obvious that he was a risk. Romulox Sep 2013 #96
We don't know how diligent his minders were in their minding. lapislzi Sep 2013 #74
That was exactly my curiosity. My two interrogators seem to think the very thought is ludicrous. nt Romulox Sep 2013 #95
Nice snark in return. Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #97
You seem to have an emotional investment in arguing points I didn't make. I don't get your hostility Romulox Sep 2013 #99
So, you have no other argument except to reduce me to emotions and hostility. Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #102
I haven't a clue what your point is, and you seem unable to articulate it. Romulox Sep 2013 #103
BTW, I even admitted my error to you, upthread. You're in full blown "no quarter" mode, nonetheless Romulox Sep 2013 #101
A plea deal for life in prison Renew Deal Sep 2013 #55
We went over this, upthread. My mistake re: rape as a capital crime. nt Romulox Sep 2013 #57
It's OK Renew Deal Sep 2013 #61
He used a bed sheet. nt Ilsa Sep 2013 #112
Yes, I gathered as much, thanks. My question was more about whether he was considered a suicide Romulox Sep 2013 #113
I think the outrage about his crimes is where we need to remain united. Ilsa Sep 2013 #114
He got off too easy. Vashta Nerada Sep 2013 #38
+1 JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #87
Good rl6214 Sep 2013 #44
I'm sorry he got out of his punishment get the red out Sep 2013 #51
Calling him an animal is an insult to the animal kingdom. . . DinahMoeHum Sep 2013 #60
Good. Let's hope his family doesn't decide to sue the state. nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #68
Every incarcerated person deserves access to a length of rope Loudly Sep 2013 #75
Really? What about the wrongly convicted? lapislzi Sep 2013 #80
Why would you deprive any such unfortunates the choice to opt out? Loudly Sep 2013 #85
Dead is permanent. lapislzi Sep 2013 #89
DTWAF Yavin4 Sep 2013 #78
Am I the only one who thinks this guy got some help? joeybee12 Sep 2013 #91
Outstanding! zappaman Sep 2013 #100
I guess the prospect of years of imprisonment didn't appeal to him. rocktivity Sep 2013 #121

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
4. We are liberals; we should not celebrate this man's death.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 05:58 AM
Sep 2013

No man is an island,
Entire of itself,
Every man is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as if a manor of thy friend's
Or of thine own were:
Any man's death diminishes me,
Because I am involved in mankind,
And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
6. “I've never killed a man, but I've read many an obituary with a great deal of satisfaction.”
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 06:24 AM
Sep 2013

Clarence Darrow.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
7. He wasn't a man. He was a coward. A rapist.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 06:29 AM
Sep 2013

A kidnapper. An abuser of women. Fuck him all the way to hell.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
34. And the Jews that the Nazis gassed were nothing but vermin, too, right?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:18 AM
Sep 2013

Sorry, but those kinds of rationalizations don't hold water.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
37. That's a bullshit comparison, and you know it.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:45 AM
Sep 2013

Castro was an evil, unrepentant SOB. I'm happy when evil is destroyed by itself.

Go ahead and waste your time feeling sorry about his death. I won't.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
120. Dehumanization of another human being is dehumanization, any way you cut it.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 09:35 PM
Sep 2013

It's been done throughout history to justify killing others, and it's wrong. It's wrong whether it's done to the Jews, or to Ariel Castro, or to blacks, or any other group, or person. It's just wrong.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
123. And you dehumanized his victims
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 10:16 PM
Sep 2013

by equating him to Holocaust victims. He beat them, tortured them, impregnated them, and forced one to have a miscarriage by almost beating her to death, and you equate his existence with Holocaust victims. You need to rethink who side he was closer to. He looks more like Hitler than his victims.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
127. I said NOTHING about his victims, except that I'm sure they would rather him face justice.
Thu Sep 5, 2013, 08:40 PM
Sep 2013

You INFER what you like, but you would be wrong. And I think you know that.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
39. Wow. What the fuck!
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:54 AM
Sep 2013

There's the biggest, most ridiculous stretch ever posted.

Sorry, but your comparison doesn't hold water.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
43. Really?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:16 PM
Sep 2013

Holy crap. I better just see my way out of this thread before I say something more......

REP

(21,691 posts)
54. Really.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:49 PM
Sep 2013

The milk of human kindness in limited quantities, reserved for those who have committed horrible crimes. Other women? Not so much.

liberalhistorian

(20,818 posts)
82. Yes, she is staunchly anti-abortion and believes
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:27 PM
Sep 2013

in severe punishment both for women who've had abortions and for doctors who perform them, regardless of the reason.

And she's also one of those deluded people who think that by making abortion illegal that that will somehow magically stop them all. HA. Statistically, there were nearly as many illegal abortions every year before '73 as there are and have been afterwards. The difference is thousands of women don't die horrible deaths, or aren't maimed or injured for life, because of them. And back-alley butchers will assuredly return if she gets her way on the law.

I remember my grandmother telling me some real horror stories about friends, classmates and family who endured illegal abortions. One of them was given no anesthetic at all, just some whiskey and a rag to bite down on. Makes me sick to even think of it.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
88. I'm just dumbfounded.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:34 PM
Sep 2013

I can see a woman saying that they wouldn't have one, as that is her choice. What I can't see is making this a crime and deciding for everyone else what it is they should be doing.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
105. Thank you. Somehow, I missed
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:06 PM
Sep 2013

those revealing discussions.

For the first time, I may put someone on Ignore.

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
69. WHO on this thread is expressing sympathy for Castro?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:01 PM
Sep 2013

I see a poster lamenting a general lack of compassion among humanity. I see regret that the sentence was not carried through.

I see no sympathy for this monster, nor do I expect to.

Do not confuse compassion with sympathy. They aren't the same thing at all. I can express compassion over a human life that was so fucked up that the human being became a monster. That's not sympathy.

Are we clear?

liberalhistorian

(20,818 posts)
90. Well-put, I do agree with that.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:05 PM
Sep 2013

I am not grave-dancing or rejoicing, but neither, however, am I in sackcloth and ashes mourning. And my compassion for what screwed him up so badly to become what he became does NOT equate to sympathy for him or victim-blaming at all.

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
92. Thanks. What we're never, ever going to see here, is justice.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:20 PM
Sep 2013

The best approximation of that concept would have been for the sentence/punishment to be carried out until the prisoner expired of "natural" causes (as opposed to a premature end by his own hand). There is no "appropriate" length of sentence, as evinced by the impossibly long consecutive prison terms. The person did not belong in society. Another society would have executed him. We didn't.

OK, he's out of society. I guess that's the best outcome. What else is to be said?

REP

(21,691 posts)
104. You must have replied to the wrong person
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:05 PM
Sep 2013

I'm not the one who compared Castro to the victims of the Holocaust; nor am I the poster who calls women who have abortions "murderers." No worries; it's easy to reply to the wrong post

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
106. I thought it was a slam dunk for over-the-top
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:16 PM
Sep 2013

by definition. Equating a violent sociopath to innocent Holocaust victims is totally absurd.

Letting that comment stand has pretty much destroyed my trust in DU's jury system. I guess it depends on time of day, etc.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
110. Me too.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:27 PM
Sep 2013

I was juror #1.


At Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:46 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

And the Jews that the Nazis gassed were nothing but vermin, too, right?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3594519

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

I can't believe hd went there: comparing Castro to Hitler's victims.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:50 AM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: This post is the definition of "over the top". Its not even a rational reply. wow.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Don't like it much, but don't think it violates CS.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Silly and inappropriate, but not abusive.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
117. We are all victims of something, or someone, Ilsa. Compassion for the least of us
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 09:16 PM
Sep 2013

is a Democratic value. Castro was a sick, sick man. But evil? I don't know that, and neither do you.

One thing that I always thought liberals did NOT do, though, was grave dance.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
124. if this is only about grave dancing i can totally back you. but, your post compared innocent people
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 10:20 PM
Sep 2013

murdered to a guilty man taking his own life. HUGE difference. and OFFENSIVE difference.

i do not grave dance. and you wont see me in any of the threads doing that. but, that isnt what your post was.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
125. Seabeyond, my post compared the DEHUMANIZATION of one person to the
Thu Sep 5, 2013, 03:07 AM
Sep 2013

DEHUMANIZATION of a group of people. That's all it did. If you think otherwise, you totally missed the point.

richmwill

(1,326 posts)
56. Poor comparison, as others have pointed out.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:50 PM
Sep 2013

Would I have mourned the death of Hitler as much as you are mourning the death of Castro? Not at all. Did you cry when Bin Laden was killed, too?

liberalhistorian

(20,818 posts)
77. First of all, that is the most ridiculous, asinine, inane,
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:22 PM
Sep 2013

absurd, nutball, STRETCH of a comparison that I have EVER heard in my life, and I've heard some doozies, believe me.

Secondly, you are a total hypocrite because if it had been a woman who'd had an abortion or a doctor who'd performed one, you'd be cheering it on.

Now, I agree with you that I take no pleasure in this man's suicide and that every life is ultimately important, no one is an island and all that. And I'm also totally against the death penalty no matter who it is. But that doesn't mean that I'm gonna mourn in sackcloth and ashes over it, either, frankly. Although I do think it would have been far worse of a punishment for him to spend the rest of his miserable life in cramped captivity, like he had no problem with subjecting his victims to. He probably figured that, too, which is why he did what he did.

cliffordu

(30,994 posts)
79. Jesus Fucking Christ on a cracker.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:25 PM
Sep 2013

Really?

You think those two things equate?

WTF is wrong with you?

Buns_of_Fire

(17,180 posts)
9. On the other hand, should the patient weep when the tumor is excised?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 06:44 AM
Sep 2013

This is where I occasionally disagree with John Donne. The tumor, in this case, chose to remove itself. No celebration, no sorrow -- it's gone. Good. Throw it in the trash and move on.

REP

(21,691 posts)
42. You must have forgotten he caused one of his victims to miscarry repeatedly
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:12 PM
Sep 2013

Or does that make her the "murderer" to you?

REP

(21,691 posts)
58. But beating, torturing, starving a woman until she miscarries = all is forgiven
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:52 PM
Sep 2013

Women make evil, selfish choices. Men deserve forgiveness. I guess.

liberalhistorian

(20,818 posts)
83. Oh, SNAP!
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:29 PM
Sep 2013

LOL

Sadly enough, there are people who WOULD think that poor Michelle Knight was to blame for her forced miscarriages.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,180 posts)
71. No, not dancing. Not mourning, either. Just glad he's gone for good.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:04 PM
Sep 2013

A post below called it "beneficial erosion," which is more in keeping with the poem than my somewhat clumsy metaphor.

But I truly believe that his death does not diminish mankind one iota.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
111. Agreed.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:31 PM
Sep 2013

I think there are a few individuals in the world that represent so much evil by causing so much pain, that mankind is healthier without them breathing air.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
119. You aren't in a position to know what his death did or did not do, are you?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 09:28 PM
Sep 2013

Because you don't stand in his victims' shoes. Wouldn't you think that the innocents that he imprisoned and tortured deserved to see him come to justice? I do.

aikoaiko

(34,170 posts)
47. I like to think of his suicide as beneficial erosion.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:33 PM
Sep 2013

There is nothing un-liberal about being glad a predator is no more.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
126. I don't celebrate
Thu Sep 5, 2013, 03:11 AM
Sep 2013

But frankly I'm not mourning, either. More of a "huh, so I guess that happened" thing

LuvNewcastle

(16,846 posts)
8. That was my first thought.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 06:32 AM
Sep 2013

It was probably the only decent thing the scumbag ever did in his rotten life.

Botany

(70,508 posts)
12. somebody messed up to allow Castro to commit suicide .....
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:02 AM
Sep 2013

.... but sooner or later he was going to die in prison but this is way too soon
he should have suffered for years.

vankuria

(904 posts)
13. Not jumping for joy
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:05 AM
Sep 2013

I think he got off way too easy, by killing himself he no longer has to pay for what he did. In a statement made by one of his victims in court she stated something to the effect of him having to think about what he's done for the rest of his life and to suffer the way he made his victims suffer.

As for saving tax payers money, I can only hope his family doesn't sue the state of Ohio for failing to protect him (from himself in this case).

Whatever anyone thinks, what matters is what his victims feel about this. Perhaps this might be true closure for them.

 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
14. my first thought was what a whimp
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:17 AM
Sep 2013

He can dish out but he can't take it. I just hope it hurt like hell

perdita9

(1,144 posts)
15. Shame on the prison system!
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:26 AM
Sep 2013

This is a complete failure on the part of the guards. I'm sure his three victims are pissed Castro was able to take himself out instead of being forced to deal with his term of punishment.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
16. If I were a victim of violent crime
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:31 AM
Sep 2013

I'd probably feel more closure if the guy was dead instead of knowing he was still around. I'm not advocating for the death penalty, I oppose that, just saying that I wouldn't be pissed that the guy was no longer around.

WCLinolVir

(951 posts)
26. You would, but it wouldn't be what you expect.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:50 AM
Sep 2013

The phrase it ain't over till it's over comes to mind. For people abused as little children it is amazing how the death of an abuser can effect you. You didn't even know that you were holding your breath for that long. And yet the death doesn't magically dissolve the emotional ties, but it sure makes it easier. Sometimes even the death makes you feel like you were cheated. But I have to say, I wish my parents had died a lot earlier. It would have been a gift. Horrid to say, but true.
The sad part is, once you are a victim of a violent traumatic crime, you don't ever feel completely safe. And you have to rebuild your functional world with that construct.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
31. yup.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 10:24 AM
Sep 2013

I literally breathed a sigh of relief when my mother died. I didn't realize I'd been holding my breath waiting to be truly free of her for 56 goddam years. Of course I knew in my head she'd never be able to hurt me again. But there was always a little knot of fear inside me half expecting her to show up shrieking and raging like something out of the exorcist...until there wasn't.

WCLinolVir

(951 posts)
40. Isn't it amazing??
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:56 AM
Sep 2013

When my sister told me my mother was dying I was so relieved. It was unexpected. Yeah, I was finally safe from this person. I had already dropped contact with her. My sister asked me to fly out to help with her care. I live across the continent now and could not do it. Nor did I want to. I knew the only reason I would was my sister, who is still in denial. My mother had resources for care but my sister insisted on helping out. I just had to let it go. I am only sorry I did not truly confront her for everything that transpired years ago. At the last moment she changed her will disinheriting all of her biological children. All 6 of us. Just had to get in a last dig.

amuse bouche

(3,657 posts)
21. Prisons are extremely understaffed
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:19 AM
Sep 2013

Go work at one for a while. You will come back singing a different tune

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
25. I can agree with your sense of outrage but...
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:39 AM
Sep 2013

as others have posted prisons are severely understaffed and often the guards are inadequately trained to deal with these types of prisoners. I am not generalizing about everyone involved in the prison system but I think that is a fair assessment looking from the outside.

Your outrage, however, should be more precisely directed to the voters of Ohio and the Ohio legislature and Governor. They are the ones that have decided on the level of funding, training, etc. in their state prison system. It is easy to blame "the system" but that is too anonymous. The system is the one designed, funded and maintained by state politicians as voted in by the electorate.

So if Ohioians are mad about this then they need to look in the mirror and decide what they want to do to improve the situation.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
33. Agreed. Also, this is part of the reason the death penalty was reinstated in Texas.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 10:57 AM
Sep 2013

Having lived there during the moratorium against the death penalty, people were content that serial killers would be kept locked up for life and never be loose in society again. Because they had the proclivity and could not be talked out of their sense of entitlement to do such acts.

Then came the 'save the taxpayers money, it's not a problem anymore, the government is too big' and 'rehabilitation is a bleeding heart liberal waste of money' memes that produced budget cutting and hampered treatment or recording of what condition these folks were in.

After a while the Supreme Court ruled that the underfunding had created a system which was in itself, wrong from overcrowding and inhumane, just as they were considering the death penalty. The result of that was that more money would have to be spent or prisoners would have to be set free to relieve overcrowding.

The state took the latter choice and released a lot of people who citizens thought would never be loose again. Several notorious serial killers were released who immediately stole vehicles, robbed, kidnapped, tortured and or raped and murdered people the same day they were freed. They kept going until caught. That's when the support for the death penalty grew again.

But it was the fault of the conservatives who did not want to pay taxes to maintain a proper system of rehabiliation or long term confinement to keep the public safe.

It always gets back the legislature, but the blame is affixed to the judiciary or executives, or anyone that can be seen as liberal when being liberal does not mean raise hell and get away with it, by any stretch of the imagination. It means keeping society functioning and safe in that way guaranteeing freedom for all who have the willingness or capacity to be so.

While I couldn't access the LATimes article to see the details as to how Castro, or if Castro alone, hung himself, the ideas bandied about here that he did it himself with a rope, strikes me as wrong in two ways. What is the proper use of rope in a prison environment?

They're not practicing lassoing horses, I'm sure, and they have shackles and cuffs, so they would have a need for rope lying around. I've used it in construction, or tying things down in transport, but it's not a thing that is available for no reason. It's not like you rent a place to live and have a check off list of 'chairs, bed, table, oh, and I need a rope just in case I want to kill myself here.'

And you must know how to make a hangman's noose and it's not that common a skill. It's also not a fast way to die or necessarily silent way to die, and if he was still in the intake process, he would have been under observation unless they were understaffed. If a guard or inmate did observe him doing so and did not interfere, that would be an illegal act. Even death row inmates are not allowed to commit suicide.

Any prison guard that facilitated this could be brought up on charges. Any inmate that helped him or forced him into this would be charged with murder. If he did this with bedsheets or using his clothing, premeditation would not be credible. But it would be if a person has been suggested, gave him a rope. At any rate, this is an unlawful killing due to a lack of supervision, or outright murder by someone who forced this. That is certainly not unknown.

And no, I don't feel sympathy for him one way or the other. But it sets a bad precedent and is a violation of his and society's rights and the court's authority for anyone to help him to end his life. It seems rather handy, and I don't go with the 'save the tax payers money' meme, either.

Because would not those same voices argue that another person, who was found wrongfully convicted, should not be 'saving taxpayer money' by either execution or committing suicide to escape an unjust or brutal system?

And I don't call him a coward, but regard him as a particularly loathesome specimen of a human I would not want to spend any time helping. But if it was a suicide, an assisted suicide or murder, noe of those show cowardice but do show either mental disorder or a crime being committed.

The brave and coward talk is about people with the liberty to choose, on a battle field, not in a prison cell. In such circumstances that person is helpless and unable to harm others, which is one of the arguments against the death penalty. That it should not be imposed upon someone who is rendered harmless to society.

While I don't rejoice at his death, anyone who does, is free to do so without any complaint from me, either. At times the mind simply wants to forget about something or have it over with.

Just my two cents.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
27. He was in protective custody, not on suicide watch.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 09:48 AM
Sep 2013

Scheduled to be checked on every 30 minutes. I expect a cunning monster like him could hang himself in half an hour.

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
30. the only way to prevent it
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 10:02 AM
Sep 2013

Wiuld have been to treat him the way PV1 manning was treated..which dunfound to be inhumane..

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
32. baloney. his 3 victims probably are able to breathe again for the first time in a decade plus
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 10:26 AM
Sep 2013

Now they know he will not turn up in their lives again. No escape. No release. Good fucking riddance.

Personally, I'm glad he spared us the cost of feeding, housing, guarding and health care.

Renew Deal

(81,859 posts)
52. He wasn't considered a risk
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:48 PM
Sep 2013

You would be the same person raving if he was kept in solitary confinement.

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
17. He indicated at his sentencing that he wanted visitation rights with the daughter
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:44 AM
Sep 2013

born from his rape of Amanda Berry. I'm pretty sure this would never have been granted, but at least his victims will be spared being dragged through any of that. I would never wish for the suicide of another human being, but since that was his choice, I wish he would have done it ten years ago and spared those young women years of horror and captivity.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
20. He didn't suffer nearly enough.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:18 AM
Sep 2013

I'm for a sci-fi kind of punishment. IIRC, he got a full thousand year prison sentence.

Make it ten thousand. And give him life extension technology so he'll have to serve the entire sentence. Yes, he'll be bored.

Or give him the full Marvin. "The first ten million years were the worst, and so were the second ten million. After the third ten million years, I went into a bit of a decline."

0rganism

(23,955 posts)
115. going sci-fi? maybe easier to achieve with VR...
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:49 PM
Sep 2013

...something that simulates the passage of time at high speed.
10 boring same-old simulated days per day. No one to interact with but AIs.
Prisoner would be immobilized, catheterized, and fed through iv during this process.
Castro could have served his full term in a mere 100 years, and he wouldn't have been able to hang himself along the way.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
22. I have mixed emotions......
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:29 AM
Sep 2013

On the one hand I feel he did not suffer enough. He kept those girls that matured into women for over a decade and yet his total incarceration was less than one year. I have always said that the death penalty is the easy way out. If you had to choose between being locked up 23 hours a day in a tiny room for the rest of your life versus going onto a gurney and injected with a cocktail of drugs that take you away from that existence, which would you choose?

On the other hand the taxpayers of Ohio will not have to pay to provide for him for the rest of his life and his victims can rest knowing he is gone. I am not trying to speak on their behalf because only they can express their own feelings about this turn of events but one fact is certain - he can never do what he did to another human being and has no chance of escape, etc.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
28. Ohio taxpayers just saved $45,000 per year for who knows how long.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 09:58 AM
Sep 2013

Or Jail Inc just lost $45,000 per year in revenue for who knows how long.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
36. Why did they accept a plea in a case in which the accused was so obviously guilty?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:22 AM
Sep 2013

And how did a man on every-30-minute suicide watch get a hold of something to make a rope out of?

This case doesn't smell right to me...

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
46. He was NOT under a suicide watch. He was simply in protective custody.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:28 PM
Sep 2013

He hung himself with a bedsheet.

And they accepted the guilty plea instead of having a death penalty trial because they may not have been successful in getting that sentence - the only person(s) Castro is accused of killing is/are fetuses. Why not save the state the insane cost of a death penalty trial and endless appeals by taking the LWOP plea?

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
48. He was being checked every 30 minutes.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:33 PM
Sep 2013

For what was he being checked on "every 30 minutes" if not a suicide watch?

The argument about fetuses is an utter red herring, and I, for one, am not biting.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
49. Well, you don't really have to 'bite' anything.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:39 PM
Sep 2013

I really don't understand what more you would have wanted the state of OH to do. They got him LWOPed with almost no expense to the state, comparatively speaking. What's the point of doing more, other than satisfying a perverted blood lust?

Anyone who is in protective custody is checked periodically - if he was on an actual suicide watch, it would have been at least every fifteen minutes if not more frequently. Anyone can kill themselves if given 30 minutes to do so, so it's clearly not to prevent suicide. Also, he would not have been given bedsheets if there was concern about suicide. And yet that's what he used.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
50. I was under the misapprehension that rape was considered a "capital" crime. I withdraw that
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:42 PM
Sep 2013

objection. I just finished researching the matter, and I was wrong.

Anyone who is in protective custody is checked periodically - if he was on an actual suicide watch, it would have been at least every fifteen minutes if not more frequently. Anyone can kill themselves if given 30 minutes to do so, so it's clearly not to prevent suicide. Also, he would not have been given bedsheets if there was concern about suicide. And yet that's what he used.


Perhaps EVERY prisoner is checked every 30 minutes, and I was mislead by news accounts. Do you know if that's the case?

riqster

(13,986 posts)
59. Not every prisoner is checked at the same intervals
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:53 PM
Sep 2013

His was 30 minutes. It's tailored to the PC and situation.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
63. I guess the cascading logic is this: if you're being checked, you're being checked for SOMETHING...
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:56 PM
Sep 2013

The idea that nobody had an idea this guy was a suicide risk seems suspect to me. That said, not one tear was shed by me this day...

riqster

(13,986 posts)
67. Not everyone in PC is a suicide risk.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:58 PM
Sep 2013

Some are checked to make sure they aren't wrecking their cells, trying to escape, or to make sure no other prisoners have slipped into the cell to abuse, rape or kill him.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
70. Castro was obviously a suicide risk.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:01 PM
Sep 2013

Obviously someone had to evaluate him for suicide risk, and that evaluation was obviously wrong. This is self-evident.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
72. And you got your medical and psychology degrees where, exactly?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:11 PM
Sep 2013

Seriously - the man fooled everybody for a decade about who and what he was. You think he couldn't fool a jailhouse shrink for a few months? Fuck yeah, he could pull that off.

Second-guessing experts only works in simple situations, and sometimes not even then.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
73. He killed himself. Logically, that means he was a suicide risk.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:13 PM
Sep 2013

The idea that nobody could've known that this infamous man serving a 1000 year sentence might be a suicide risk is silly, so I'm not sure why you want to argue it.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
76. By your logic, anyone facing a life term should be classified a suicide risk,
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:22 PM
Sep 2013

and prisons should hire enough personnel to continuously watch all of them, all the time. Good luck with that.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
94. No, not "anyone". But infamous criminals serving 1000 year sentences?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:24 PM
Sep 2013

Nice snark, btw. Was I less than cordial with you?

riqster

(13,986 posts)
81. Your syllogism fails, as do so many, because of an underlying premise.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:26 PM
Sep 2013

Assuming that his suicide risk was obvious is specious. The authorities have every reason to exceed the need with respect to security, so if there were such indications they would have upped the security, if only to mitigate their liability.

It's easy to draw conclusions and make judgements based on evidence that appears after the fact. But to pretend that the people involved with the situation could have foreseen this event is hindsight at best.

Hindsight, as one of my uncles famously said, "ain't nothin' but lookin' out yer backside".

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
96. BTW, I never said that "his suicide risk was obvious". I said it is now obvious that he was a risk.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:29 PM
Sep 2013

That is an important distinction. I suspect you had to modify my argument because you cannot possibly argue against the latter point.

"But to pretend that the people involved with the situation could have foreseen this event is hindsight at best."

Of course it is possible to have foreseen Castro's suicide. That's also not debatable. That's where the very concept of "suicide watch" comes from, after all.

You're arguing whether his suicide should have been foreseen. Not whether it could have.

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
74. We don't know how diligent his minders were in their minding.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:21 PM
Sep 2013

As another poster has pointed out, they may have been criminally negligent in their minding of the prisoner, believing (correctly) that nobody would be especially sorry to see the prisoner die by his own hand.

If anyone can tell me what would or would have constituted "justice" in this case, I'm all ears. There are no good ends, none.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
95. That was exactly my curiosity. My two interrogators seem to think the very thought is ludicrous. nt
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:26 PM
Sep 2013

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
97. Nice snark in return.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:32 PM
Sep 2013

And yes, you are being ludicrous. As your other "interrogator" pointed out - Castro managed to hide his true self from every fucking person he knew for ten fucking years. It's not inconceivable that he could have fooled prison personnel in the two short months he was detained. It wouldn't be the first time and it won't be the last. But thank god you're here to set everyone straight - maybe you ought to contact the Ohio board of corrections and offer your services. I'm sure they'll be gobsmacked to find out that some inmates are suicide risks.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
102. So, you have no other argument except to reduce me to emotions and hostility.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:38 PM
Sep 2013

Which is a good way to minimize my point, right? Well, you are bewildering to me as well, so I'm done with this. Have the last word.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
103. I haven't a clue what your point is, and you seem unable to articulate it.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:40 PM
Sep 2013

I honestly haven't a clue what you are trying to say, or what you are trying to disagree with. If that is just one more reason for you to take offense, well...

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
101. BTW, I even admitted my error to you, upthread. You're in full blown "no quarter" mode, nonetheless
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:36 PM
Sep 2013

What value/belief of mine are you attempting to refute? It may help to refocus the discussion if you could restate it.

Renew Deal

(81,859 posts)
55. A plea deal for life in prison
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:50 PM
Sep 2013

Because it avoided a trial?

I read that he wasn't considered a risk. Where did you see that he was on a 30 minute watch?

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
113. Yes, I gathered as much, thanks. My question was more about whether he was considered a suicide
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:35 PM
Sep 2013

risk--such people aren't usually given access to bedsheets, belts, shoelaces, etc.

Anyhow, I've made a poster extremely cross with me for asking about this, for reasons I don't full understand. I think I will leave it alone, as I don't really know what to think, other than a residual outrage at this man's crimes.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
114. I think the outrage about his crimes is where we need to remain united.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:37 PM
Sep 2013

As a recovered rape victim, I won't pretend that his death saddens me in any way, or that I won't rejoice that he ended his life on his own. I simply won't be that dishonest.

DinahMoeHum

(21,789 posts)
60. Calling him an animal is an insult to the animal kingdom. . .
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:56 PM
Sep 2013

In the animal kingdom, the female gestures to the male that she is ready for mating - giving consent as it were.

Ariel Castro was far, far worse than an animal.

Sorry, but I'm glad he's gone.

 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
75. Every incarcerated person deserves access to a length of rope
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:22 PM
Sep 2013

and a sturdy overhead pipe, beam or hook to fasten it to.

It's the humane thing to do for anyone on the inside.

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
80. Really? What about the wrongly convicted?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:25 PM
Sep 2013

Perhaps they suffer total despair of ever winning an appeal or parole. Should they just off themselves to avoid gumming up the system?

I'm glad you're not my jailer.

 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
85. Why would you deprive any such unfortunates the choice to opt out?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:31 PM
Sep 2013

Forced confinement is preferable?

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
89. Dead is permanent.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:43 PM
Sep 2013

If you're that determined to off yourself, you'll find a way. I'm a firm believer in going out on your own terms. But stacking the deck just isn't fair. Giving people the means and opportunity when they've already got the motive...is cruel in its own way.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
91. Am I the only one who thinks this guy got some help?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:07 PM
Sep 2013

I mean, it could be a suicide, it could have been made to look like a suicide...he didn't have many fans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cleveland kidnapper Ariel...