General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWorst VP also-ran since 2000?
5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Lieberman | |
1 (20%) |
|
Edwards | |
1 (20%) |
|
Palin | |
3 (60%) |
|
Ryan | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)JI7
(89,249 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Is how I voted.
dkf
(37,305 posts)LAGC
(5,330 posts)That race should have never been close... at least not close enough to steal.
He is a total warmongering hawk, "insufferable centrist", and I wouldn't have trusted him any more than Bush in the driver's seat after a terrorist attack.
No wonder so many stayed home or voted for Nader.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)and another who couldn't find that country on a map of Israel.
Not a fair choice.
Behind the Aegis
(53,957 posts)last1standing
(11,709 posts)I'm very fond of you, Aegis, but we're not going to agree on this subject.
n/t
Behind the Aegis
(53,957 posts)I am fond of you too, so I will say ponder this:
If someone implies that worm, Lindsey Graham, is a "nancy boy," is it suddenly not homophobia, and actually acceptable?
last1standing
(11,709 posts)I'm not calling Lieberman anti-Semitic names, I'm saying that his record supports another countries interests more than ours. I think that accusation is firmly backed up by his record in support of conservative Israeli interests (note: conservative Israeli interests are not necessarily Jewish interests as you well know) and his hawkish desire to invade any other Middle-Eastern nation at the drop of a hat.
You see it differently and I respect that.
Behind the Aegis
(53,957 posts)And yes, it is homophobic to imply someone is gay when it is done to "shame" them. As I said, I can match his votes and speeches to a number of non-Jewish senators, the same is true for "his hawkish desire to invade any other Middle-Eastern nation at the drop of a hat." Interestingly enough, those senators are accused to being in the pocket of the MIC, unless, like Lieberman and they are Jewish, then suddenly, their loyalty is to Israel, not the US. It is still anti-Semitism.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)However, they weren't in the poll so I didn't mention them. Lieberman certainly has not been acting on his own in this and I am happy to disparage their loyalties as well. Again, I do not conflate the nation of Israel or its policies with Jewish people. In fact, I don't think that I've ever known a Jewish person who conflated the two.
As for Graham, I support outing gay people who vote against equal rights for the LGBT community. I know many don't, but I believe that closet gays who exploit homophobic ignorance for personal power lose the right to have their decision whether to reveal their sexual orientation respected.
Behind the Aegis
(53,957 posts)Then why aren't they more loyal to Israel? This demonstrates that difference: Lieberman vs. McCain. The article about McCain actually mentions Israel, yet not one accusation he is "more loyal to Israel." Not a single accusation! Yet, in the Lieberman thread, we see plenty of accusations similar to yours, and some even worse. Both are touting similar positions, yet only one is the traitor to another country, the Jew!
I never said, nor do I assume you do; just so I am clear. I understand this about you and I am not claiming you are an anti-Semite, I am saying what you said is anti-Semitic.
I think you misunderstood the example. I am fine with outing hypocritical homophobes. What I am saying is implying he is gay because he is single, somewhat effeminate, and not a "manly man," he therefore must be gay; that is homophobic. Try this: "Wow! He is really masculine for a gay man." "She's so feminine, it's hard to believe she's a lesbian." You do see why those are homophobic, right? Now, draw the line to anti-Semitism, "Hey, he has the same voting record and his hawking for another war, but what do you expect, he's more loyal to Israel (because he is a Jew)." The last part is almost always unsaid, but it is said!
Think about it.
(edit to make it easier to follow)
last1standing
(11,709 posts)While Lieberman is often questioned, and that is anti-Semitic. McCain, Graham and many others should be called out for what they are, disloyal to the American people because they put the interests of Israel before ours.
I also agree about Graham. I did misunderstand your point.
Behind the Aegis
(53,957 posts)So you can see how questioning Lieberman's loyalty for the exact same thing others are doing is anti-Semitic. Though, I disagree they (including Lieberman) are putting Israel's interests above the US (this 'conflict' has jack to do with Israel), they are putting their own desires for control (be it oil, power, or what have you) above what is just.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)I'll even go so far as to state that it would be easy to see my comment as anti-Semitic placed in the context you provided. I can only assure you that it wasn't meant to be so and I will make sure the next time I suggest Lieberman is in the pocket of Israel that I include others who are absolutely just as bad or worse.
Response to Behind the Aegis (Reply #8)
SidDithers This message was self-deleted by its author.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)She is probably the least credentialed, least prepared, least intelligent person to ever have the chance of becoming VP.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Palin.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I can see her stupidity from here.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I consider Palin to be an agent sent from God to help the Democrats. Who am I to question a Godsend.