Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 12:37 PM Sep 2013

Rim Fire: Did illegal marijuana growers start the blaze?

FRESNO, Calif. — For the first time Friday, authorities suggested an illegal marijuana growing operation may have started the massive Rim Fire.
The fire chief of the town of Twain Harte also said it was caused by humans, noting there was no lightning in the area.
Officially, the U.S. Forest Service is just saying the cause is under investigation.


http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/local/authorities-illegal-pot-grow-may-have-caused-rim-f/nZhzF/

---

If so then here is another avoidable tragedy. A tragedy that would not have happened if Cannabis was legal and regulated.
The war on weed affects us in negative ways we are continuing to discover.

I hope California and all the other states do as Washington and Colorado have done.

--
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rim Fire: Did illegal marijuana growers start the blaze? (Original Post) SHRED Sep 2013 OP
Do you honestly believe that? Bennyboy Sep 2013 #1
I will counter with... SHRED Sep 2013 #6
I agree with you. If people want cheap old weed, they'll put some in a pot on the balcony or in the MADem Sep 2013 #7
Growing your own is already legal... displacedtexan Sep 2013 #22
It's a lot cheaper than $200 for a rec shanti Sep 2013 #27
see, and this is the thing Bennyboy Sep 2013 #32
In colorado, dr recommendation is $65 Billy Love Sep 2013 #40
If it's legal they won't have to grow it in our national forests. kestrel91316 Sep 2013 #13
Exactly! n/t etherealtruth Sep 2013 #19
but, when it comes to taxation Bennyboy Sep 2013 #33
I don't see too many stealth grows of almonds or grapes, lol. kestrel91316 Sep 2013 #34
Because everyone grows their own tobacco Politicalboi Sep 2013 #21
Most people just go to the liquor store. backscatter712 Sep 2013 #31
They don't call it weed for nothing. bemildred Sep 2013 #23
A FOX affiliate? hobbit709 Sep 2013 #2
KTVU is a Fox-affiliated television station that airs Fox entertainment, not FAUX news. Brother Buzz Sep 2013 #5
So...because the grand exalted cannabis may have a role in the fire Dreamer Tatum Sep 2013 #3
If cannabis was legal you would not be growing it in the forests. Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #8
"Your honor, yes, I DID kill my wife. But if murder wasn't illegal, I wouldn't be here." Dreamer Tatum Sep 2013 #12
On the edge of a clear cut, at the top of a ridge, it looks like. bemildred Sep 2013 #35
Dude, you sound very angry. Take a toke, relax. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #10
+1...nt Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #15
I'm worried that he isn't angry enough Orrex Sep 2013 #18
My Take bakpakr Sep 2013 #4
This is, of course, pure speculation. Not a shred of evidence. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #9
As in perhaps ... GeorgeGist Sep 2013 #11
^^^THIS^^^ kestrel91316 Sep 2013 #14
That's exactly what I was thinking. nt RiffRandell Sep 2013 #17
That sounds more like it Politicalboi Sep 2013 #24
That's more likely. SammyWinstonJack Sep 2013 #28
That's plausible. In_The_Wind Sep 2013 #37
... FirstLight Sep 2013 #16
It's easier than that, I recently saw a sign that advised caution Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #20
I just realized that I don't care for the use of "grow" as a noun Orrex Sep 2013 #26
Farmers work at a farm Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #36
All the more reason to legalize it mick063 Sep 2013 #25
Did tobacco smokers from some US city start the fire? JEB Sep 2013 #29
No, Glenn Beck did NuclearDem Sep 2013 #30
500 or so dollars and some seeds madrchsod Sep 2013 #38
In the old days, the forest service and the bootleggers had an arrangement FarCenter Sep 2013 #39
 

Bennyboy

(10,440 posts)
1. Do you honestly believe that?
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 12:52 PM
Sep 2013

I don't........................ not for one second do I believe that legalization will stop this type of growing operation. The demand

is high and the supply short, so people will cut costs and offer cheap, poorly grown weed. (Which is what these grows offer) Also many regulations will be in place after legalization making this type of grow even more attractive. Then there is the tax thing. Grow on your property you get taxed. Grow in a remote place with no structures and no taxes...

Don't get me wrong I am the biggest proponent of legalization but there is a LOT of wrong headedness about what will happen and how it will happen. The new CA initiative is full of stuff that is wrong (like growers paying little to NO TAXES on their crops) etc. The simple truth is if 10% of the CA population smokes an 1/8th a week, CA, just to supply it's yearly needs, 7 million one pound yield plants. And seeing how is harder to find people that don't smoke pot that it is to find people that do here in CA< that number is probably in the 20 million plant category....

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
6. I will counter with...
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:11 PM
Sep 2013

I believe that the price for Marijuana will fall through the floor when people can legally grow their own. The main tax revenue generator will be agribusiness growing hemp and the cottage industries the plant use produces.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
7. I agree with you. If people want cheap old weed, they'll put some in a pot on the balcony or in the
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:17 PM
Sep 2013

back yard. Plenty of people will grow it as a sideline, rules be damned.

People who want "primo" goods will pay a little more for fancy blends, but those sneaky "out in the woods" operations will be gone by the wayside.

In the middle east, the shit grows everywhere--in ditches, outside the police stations, as an "ornamental plant."

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
22. Growing your own is already legal...
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:58 PM
Sep 2013

at least it is in San Francisco. I don't know anyone who actually buys it on the street. The 215 Recommendation that allows you to grow your own for personal use is cheaper than buying it. i don't know how much you'd have to grow to get the amount of stuff you need (I can't stand the smell!), but the people I know who grow it do it legally so they can control the quality. I've used their pot butter to bake stuff for them (because I went to pastry school several years ago), but I don't actually eat it.

My neighbor says it's $200 for the doctor's Recommendation and about $135 annually to keep the legal status.

Could be different in other parts of the state. I've only lived here a year.

shanti

(21,675 posts)
27. It's a lot cheaper than $200 for a rec
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:14 PM
Sep 2013

Less than a hundred usually. Never heard anything about paying a yearly fee tho. When it expires, you go back and get another card (same cost as th first). YMMV

 

Bennyboy

(10,440 posts)
32. see, and this is the thing
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:52 PM
Sep 2013

nobody wants to grow their own. People dont brew their. beer, grow food or slaughter animals for food, what on earth makes you think they will not go the easy way with pot? Fast food? People want convenience and, as someone who knows the CA dispensary biz well, it is about ten to one as to who buys clones and who buys finished goods.

And let me tell ya, the dispensaries are packed everyday in SF. I know a number of people that sell pot products everywhere at every event in the city.

(And yes I know that some people will grow their own, but not everyone will that is for sure.

Complete legalization, with store fronts etc, would require acres upon acres of weed.....

 

Billy Love

(117 posts)
40. In colorado, dr recommendation is $65
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 11:58 AM
Sep 2013

and license is $35.

and many MMJ stores are encouraging to keep the license for at least one more year. I'm going to reup it when the 60 day period hit later this month.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
13. If it's legal they won't have to grow it in our national forests.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:28 PM
Sep 2013

They will be able to grow it on private property without fear of having that property seized.

Having to hike in to a stealth grow and manage it is a royal PITA, and it's far easier to just grow it in a greenhouse or on open marginal farmland.

 

Bennyboy

(10,440 posts)
33. but, when it comes to taxation
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:54 PM
Sep 2013

the stealth grow is preferential. And somewhere there is gonna have to be taxes paid on crops just like almonds or grapes.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
34. I don't see too many stealth grows of almonds or grapes, lol.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 05:09 PM
Sep 2013

The big boys will want to get involved, and that means lots of documentation and openness. Just like when bootlegging ended and liquor became legal again.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
31. Most people just go to the liquor store.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:42 PM
Sep 2013

If weed was legal, most people would just go to the dispensary/head shop/weed shop. And those shops would get their weed from legal farmers, so there would be no need or financial incentive for stealth grows in national forests.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
23. They don't call it weed for nothing.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:01 PM
Sep 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:47 PM - Edit history (1)

All this stuff about fancy weed is marketing bullshit. All you have to do is cull the males (scary idea, eh?) and you get good weed, and it's dirt cheap, literally, borders on free, if you grow your own.

If you want to amp it up, you can make hash oil out of just about any stuff, you just may have to use a lot, but hey, it's free. Lot's of MMJ users do exactly that.

The "shortage" is entirely artificial and the result of prohibition. Like distilled spirits: the innate cost of grain alcohol is pennies per drink.

And nobody would be doing these forest grows without the incentive of black market prices, it's expensive to do that way, like the grow houses.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
3. So...because the grand exalted cannabis may have a role in the fire
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:02 PM
Sep 2013

it is the fault of nonlegalization?

What a goddamned pantload of horseshit.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
8. If cannabis was legal you would not be growing it in the forests.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:21 PM
Sep 2013

You would be growing it in California's central valley next to the tomatoes and almond trees.

The only reasons that marijuana is grown in the forests of northern California is the remoteness of the area, hippie culture and the ability to hide your grows.

Here is a not very well hidden 22 greenhouse grow



that same production could be done on half/quarter of the land in the central valley, and they wouldn't have to steal water.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
12. "Your honor, yes, I DID kill my wife. But if murder wasn't illegal, I wouldn't be here."
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:27 PM
Sep 2013

"So I blame the law. Now can I go, please?"

bakpakr

(168 posts)
4. My Take
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:04 PM
Sep 2013

My take is that at this point they really do not know what started the fire.

With all the positive news that Cannabis is receiving lately pertaining to legalization, this is a way to make Cannabis seem like a big bad monster to the population.

You have the DOJ backing off on Washington and Colorado. You have statistics that driving deaths are falling due to substance use in the states that have some form of legalization be it medicinal or outright legalization. Also all the studies coming out that Cannabis does in fact have positive health benefits.

We saw not long after the DOJ and Eric Holder stated that they would allow the states to go forward with their legalization laws that law enforcement released a statement that they are highly opposed to that position.

Also public opinion for the end to the war on Cannabis is becoming more in favor ending the war.

So they need to and are scrambling to find anything that will allow them to maintain the War on Cannabis. I see more of this in the future until such time as the war on cannabis is officially ended.

FirstLight

(13,360 posts)
16. ...
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:42 PM
Sep 2013

I have a friend who is very familiar with that area and has worked at the park for years ...he and I were actually discussing that it could have been a DEA raid that went wrong. all they had to do was ignite some fertilizer and *poof*
but they of course will find a way to blame the growers...

there has been a huge increase in grows inside the park over the past few years...

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
20. It's easier than that, I recently saw a sign that advised caution
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:56 PM
Sep 2013

Parking in tall dry grass
Dragging chains
Using a weed wacker with a metal blade
Basically anything that could spark off a rock.

Raid teams often have a heavy footprint with trailers etc, it's possible but unlikely.

Orrex

(63,212 posts)
26. I just realized that I don't care for the use of "grow" as a noun
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:07 PM
Sep 2013

Not saying that other people shouldn't use it, rather that the usage seems odd to me.

I mean, I wouldn't say "I'm having an eat of food for dinner."

But I would say "I'm having a drink of water."


Gosh, I just can't decide.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
36. Farmers work at a farm
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:00 PM
Sep 2013

Growers work at a grow.

The question is why are they called growers and not farmers.

Which headline do you like?

Police raid cannabis farm, arrest farmer who faces 30 years.

or

Police raid marijuana grow, arrest grower who faces 30 years.

or

Police raid cartel grow, arrest growers who face 30 years.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
25. All the more reason to legalize it
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:05 PM
Sep 2013

And grow the stuff in regulated farms, driving down the black market price, and putting those that grow on US government land out of business.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
38. 500 or so dollars and some seeds
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 11:51 AM
Sep 2013

grow a few plants in the closet or spare room.keep it yourself or sell a bit to your friends. gets rid of the criminal organizations.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
39. In the old days, the forest service and the bootleggers had an arrangement
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 11:58 AM
Sep 2013

The wardens wouldn't tell the revenuers where the stills were; the bootleggers wouldn't set the forest on fire.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rim Fire: Did illegal mar...