Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverStone

(7,228 posts)
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 10:31 PM Aug 2013

If Obama strikes Syria unilaterally, would it unify the Democratic Party in opposition?

According to this poll from Huff Post, Obama striking Syria would be without much public support. On DU, I'd assume it's much less than 25%.

I hope he takes no military action anytime soon, and preferably not at all. I believe a rush to war without compelling and absolute evidence, support from a majority of US citizens, and participation from other countries in the UN would be a sea change moment. It could forever erode President's support at home and his place in history.

Getting out of Shrub's war in Iraq was one of the main winning points in his election.

This "Decider in Chief" talk is now too reminiscent of Shrub's behavior and I dearly hope President Obama respects the will of We The People and slow the fuck down on the rush to war. Not doing so will have BIG political consequences, just not sure how it would manifest?

Would a large faction of our President's own party rally against him? Or all Americans from any party? Speaking as someone who enthusiastically voted twice for Obama, I would not hesitate to speak out against such foolhardy action.




5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Obama strikes Syria unilaterally, would it unify the Democratic Party in opposition? (Original Post) RiverStone Aug 2013 OP
I'm already against his policies bif Aug 2013 #1
Agree - and it's worse because we assume the President WE elected... RiverStone Aug 2013 #2
It depends on what happened as a result. David__77 Aug 2013 #3
You said: That could lead to disaster politically. RiverStone Aug 2013 #4
everyone should base their opinion.... dtom67 Aug 2013 #5

bif

(22,759 posts)
1. I'm already against his policies
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 10:42 PM
Aug 2013

And the whole country is against a strike against Syria. So if he does this, he's doing it alone. I can't believe we're marching into war again. This is ludicrous. This just like the stupid blunder against Iraq. Only worse.

RiverStone

(7,228 posts)
2. Agree - and it's worse because we assume the President WE elected...
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 10:45 PM
Aug 2013

Will not walk the same irrational path as Shrub & Shooter. He's smarter than that, or so I hope!

David__77

(23,517 posts)
3. It depends on what happened as a result.
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 10:46 PM
Aug 2013

If he really took a "shot across the bow" and that was that, and the Syrian civil war continue on its path, then perhaps the impact would be limited. But I find that this would not be the likely outcome. Once US missiles (not NATO, not UN, not Arab League, but US) are fired, there is a logic that the superpower owns the conflict now. That could lead to disaster politically.

dtom67

(634 posts)
5. everyone should base their opinion....
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:08 AM
Aug 2013

On what they believe, not on the Party line.

This ain't the grand old party ,ya know....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Obama strikes Syria un...