Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,320 posts)
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 06:56 AM Aug 2013

Manning's 35 year sentence works out to about 25 minutes/document-released, which is just about

the amount of time it would have taken him to give each document a thoughtful first-read (if he didn't do anything else 24/7): that's about how much time per doc it took the army to examine a sampling of his release

He would have been in a much better place right now if he'd intelligently chosen his release. With ten or twenty documents telling an important coherent story to a newspaper, he would have had widespread political support IMO. With a hundred carefully chosen documents, he would have faced court-martial and dishonorable discharge but he wouldn't be looking at 35 years

Retired Colonel James McCarl said .... initial military review included assigning personnel to read the first 2,000 documents in a set of 110,000 that might include military information ... "Our calculation is that we spent 855 man-hours, which equates to roughly about $200,000 to do all that work," McCarl said ...
Manning's WikiLeaks breach triggered costly U.S. Army scramble: witness
FORT MEADE, Maryland
Wed Aug 7, 2013 1:52pm EDT
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/07/us-usa-wikileaks-manning-idUSBRE9760ZZ20130807

(35 x 365 x 24 x 60)/730000 ~ 25 min ~ (855 x 60)/2000



11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manning's 35 year sentence works out to about 25 minutes/document-released, which is just about (Original Post) struggle4progress Aug 2013 OP
Seriously? This is a view you support? Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #1
It's a factual observation: I provided the arithmetic for anyone troubled by calculation struggle4progress Aug 2013 #4
So do you support the viewpoint expressed in the OP? Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #8
Do you dispute the arithmetic? How much of Manning's gigantic release have you read carefully? struggle4progress Aug 2013 #9
Yes, he would have gotten decades even for only 100 docs. morningfog Aug 2013 #11
I agree, the sentence is just customerserviceguy Aug 2013 #2
At nearly $234/hr ... GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #3
That is some sick spin. morningfog Aug 2013 #5
It's an interesting and informative coincidence. He'll be out in ten struggle4progress Aug 2013 #6
The military spent $200,000.00? DefenseLawyer Aug 2013 #7
that's how i've felt about it also markiv Aug 2013 #10

struggle4progress

(118,320 posts)
4. It's a factual observation: I provided the arithmetic for anyone troubled by calculation
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 07:55 AM
Aug 2013

The amount of time Manning got just happens to work out to the amount of time it would take him to actually read all the stuff he released

struggle4progress

(118,320 posts)
9. Do you dispute the arithmetic? How much of Manning's gigantic release have you read carefully?
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 11:46 AM
Aug 2013

Do you believe Manning would still have gotten a 35 year sentence if he had only released (say) 100 documents?

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
2. I agree, the sentence is just
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 07:17 AM
Aug 2013

He can look forward to seeing some life outside of prison, and with the potential of early parole, it might not take terribly long. Of course, I wouldn't expect that during a Hillary Clinton administration, he embarassed her terribly. If a Repuke follows her one or two terms, they won't let the military release Manning either.

 

markiv

(1,489 posts)
10. that's how i've felt about it also
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 01:18 PM
Aug 2013

if you're going to leak, the burdon of proof is on you for each and every classified document you leak

there's no way he could comprehend the volume of stuff he leaked, yet all of it will be pored over by foreign nationals

i'm not against whistleblowers per se (and i'm not against snowden, based on what i know so far), but you cant be careless about how you do it

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Manning's 35 year sentenc...