General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGingrich Looking Churchillian
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHA (consider the source below)
<Leadership: A great debater. Politically polarizing. Prone to error, but also prone to spectacular success. Steeped in history. Politically brilliant. Unorthodox. Audacious.
Churchill, like Gingrich, was a brilliant politician with a powerful sense of the occasion.
Indeed, by Churchill's own admission, "The Conservatives have never liked nor trusted me." The same thing can be said of Gingrich, who has had a tortured relationship with the GOP's conservative wing, to say the least.
"And yet, when his nation called on him to lead in 1940, Churchill was ready the right man for the right time. With America's government under President Obama moving rapidly to the extreme left, Gingrich too might be the right man for the right time.
Both Churchill and Gingrich, in different ways, are men of letters and ideas. Avid writers, each has a deep sense of how current events fit into history.>
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2850542/posts
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)-- Paul Krugman (with help from Elizabeth Bowen)
rockivity
[IMG][/IMG]
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Loudmxr
(1,405 posts)Besides he has more hair than Churchill.
Nah don't see it.
JI7
(89,276 posts)Owlet
(1,248 posts)Fifty years from now no one will remember Newt except for students or arcane political trivia. The other three guys changed history: New merely rewrites and revises it.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)Newt? Not even good enough to wipe the asses of the other three.
Actually, I'm even slightly embarrassed to think that someone would even put newt in the same category as the other three.