Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 11:28 AM Aug 2013

Dying teen put on the transplant list after being rejected...something to ponder

the hospital originally said he was being denied for "medical non-compliance"....however, the mom says he has never been ill or had medications before.....

http://www.12newsnow.com/story/23133917/teen-added-to-transplant-list-after-originally-denied

Non-compliance is a broad term, but one doctor said it could refer to a patient's previous medical behavior.

"What places you on a lower part of the transplant list is evidence that you haven't followed through in taking your medications in the past," said Dr. Nieca Goldberg, medical director of NYU Women's Heart Program.

However, with no history of illness or previous medications prescribed, Hamilton believes her son was being punished for having a criminal record.

The teen was under house arrest and wearing an ankle monitor when his heart condition was discovered in the hospital's ER.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dying teen put on the transplant list after being rejected...something to ponder (Original Post) Horse with no Name Aug 2013 OP
I would guess he was missing appointments Boudica the Lyoness Aug 2013 #1
Maybe that's because race matters. antigone382 Aug 2013 #5
He's first in line, even! mwrguy Aug 2013 #2
How long was it between the diagnosis and the evaluation by the transplant team? riderinthestorm Aug 2013 #3
there have always been death panels dembotoz Aug 2013 #4
 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
1. I would guess he was missing appointments
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 12:28 PM
Aug 2013

and maybe other things.

But we want to make it about race here don't we. Because we know the more we race bait the better everything will become.

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
5. Maybe that's because race matters.
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 08:02 PM
Aug 2013

Here's a few excerpts from just one scholarly article citing a wealth of carefully conducted studies on racial discrimination in healthcare. It took me about five minutes to find, and there are many more.

RACISM AND HEALTH CARE IN AMERICA: LEGAL RESPONSES TO RACIAL DISPARITIES IN THE ALLOCATION OF KIDNEYS
Cara A. Fauci*


http://www.bc.edu/dam/files/schools/law/lawreviews/journals/bctwj/21_1/02_TXT.htm


Statistical data indicates that African-American babies have lower birth weights and are more likely to die during the first year of life [*PG42]than children born to European-American parents.61 For example, African-American babies are twice as likely to die during the first year of life as European-American babies, and children born in countries that are significantly less developed than the United States, such as Kuwait, Costa Rica and Singapore, are more likely to live past age one than children born to African Americans in the United States.62

(snip)

Scholars devoted to the study of racial discrimination in the medical profession have also drawn attention to the fact that African Americans are less likely to be prescribed medication than European Americans. 96 For example, in 1994 the New England Journal of Medicine reported that African-American AIDS patients received prescriptions for needed medications less frequently than European-American AIDS patients even after income, insurance status, mode of HIV transmission and place of residence were controlled for.97 Another study conducted on racial discrimination in the dissemination of prescription medication found that African-American children were less likely to leave doctor’s appointments with prescriptions than European-American children.98

(snip)

Research also reveals that, on average, African Americans receive less aggressive treatment for various physical ailments even after income adjustments are made to the data.103 For instance, studies pertaining to cardiac treatment reveal that African-American men are half as likely to undergo coronary angiography and one third as likely to undergo coronary artery bypass surgery as European-American men.104 These astonishing statistics are even more troubling in light of the fact that African-American males are more likely to suffer from heart disease than European-American males.105

Studies also indicate that the intensity of treatment within the realm of internal medicine is influenced by racial considerations.106 Even after income differentials are taken into account, research reveals that African-American patients are less likely to be treated aggressively for illnesses and/or conditions such as pneumonia, kidney failure, and glaucoma than European Americans.


(snip)

Research indicates that, after adjusting for income, some procedures are in fact performed with greater frequency on African-American patients than on European Americans suffering from the same ailments.111 Unfortunately, those procedures are of the type that most people, regardless of race, would hope to avoid undergoing.112 For example, African Americans are three times more likely than European Americans to have a partial or total amputation of the leg.113 Similarly, African-American men are twice as likely to have a bilateral orchietomy in attempts to treat prostate cancer than European-American men.114 The implications of this research indicate that the medical profession may detect certain illnesses in African Americans at more advanced stages.115 As a consequence, less invasive and less drastic treatment measures are no longer viable.116

Knowing this, if it was your teenaged child that needed a heart transplant, would you question whether race played a role in his being denied? Would you fight it with everything you had?

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
3. How long was it between the diagnosis and the evaluation by the transplant team?
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 07:16 PM
Aug 2013

There's no way the appointment with the transplant team was "instantaneous" as soon as he had the diagnosis. Getting all of them lined up to evaluate her son, have the necessary conferences, the paperwork and hearing from the MELD scorers takes weeks. And that's if the team is REALLY sharp and manages to coordinate FAST.

If Anthony screwed up at all during that time, he would have been labelled non-compliant and rightly so. Organs are precious. And if you can't be trusted to participate in your healthcare scrupulously and meticulously, then you shouldn't get one. Its FAR too easy to screw up the anti-rejection drugs (which number 50+ in the early days, spread out over 6 doses).

If you demonstrate you aren't capable before hand, even once, you are off.

FYI, my sister had a double kidney/liver transplant in Feb 2012. As her #1 support team member I was there every step of the way - from the initial eval to the final days of post-op recovery.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dying teen put on the tra...