Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

garybeck

(9,942 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:44 PM Feb 2012

On a cold winter morning this woman had nothing better to do but stand on a street corner and...



I live in a small town. There's one traffic light in the whole town. A few days ago on a freezing cold morning I was dropping my kids off at school and this woman was standing on the corner by the traffic light. I asked if I could take her picture and is she minded me posting it on the internet to help spread her message.
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On a cold winter morning this woman had nothing better to do but stand on a street corner and... (Original Post) garybeck Feb 2012 OP
god love her! She doesn't look all that young. I hope she's OK... CTyankee Feb 2012 #1
I hope the people Manning put at risk are okay... Zax2me Feb 2012 #16
links please roody Feb 2012 #17
Everyone I know of who he put "at risk" were criminals, traitors, or both. What's "OK" for them? saras Feb 2012 #24
Why are you spreading misinformation? EOTE Feb 2012 #30
Who are these people who aren't okay on account of Manning? n/t truedelphi Feb 2012 #36
I admire her attitude... NaturalHigh Feb 2012 #2
But what if he didn't break the law? gratuitous Feb 2012 #9
The law he broke is pretty clear-cut jmowreader Feb 2012 #19
Neither WikiLeaks or Assange has confirmed that Manning is a source. Never not ever. Luminous Animal Feb 2012 #22
There is evidence that Manning is the source. Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #25
Actually, Manning like all accused persons is entitled to a fair trial JDPriestly Feb 2012 #23
Welcome to the minority view gratuitous Feb 2012 #28
Did you ask her if she was a DUer? Renew Deal Feb 2012 #3
what? Is there supposed be a picture here? Liberal_in_LA Feb 2012 #4
I see a picture.... try to refresh? garybeck Feb 2012 #10
Did she give a reason why she is doing this? RC Feb 2012 #5
doing what? No photo on my screen. Liberal_in_LA Feb 2012 #6
mine either. n/t laruemtt Feb 2012 #7
Does this work? RC Feb 2012 #8
I see a picture.... try to refresh? n/t garybeck Feb 2012 #11
No photo for me either Raine Feb 2012 #12
not sure why you can't see it but try this garybeck Feb 2012 #13
THANKS, I see it now! What a sweetheart, just got to love her! Raine Feb 2012 #21
That is the OP's picture that I loaded on my site to post here, because people couldn't see his. RC Feb 2012 #27
presumably because she supports Bradley Manning. n/t garybeck Feb 2012 #14
Yea, he's completely innocent... Zax2me Feb 2012 #15
The point isn't guilt or innocence, The Doctor. Feb 2012 #26
of topic: Is that an authentic "laughing man" symbol? /nt Dragonfli Feb 2012 #32
Why yes it is. From GITS. The Doctor. Feb 2012 #40
Concisely put, and well done. truedelphi Feb 2012 #37
What's with the hit and runs? Completely unable to defend your lies? EOTE Feb 2012 #31
Thank you for pointing out this person's trends. truedelphi Feb 2012 #38
The MIC really doesn't need another cheerleader/liar. EOTE Feb 2012 #39
Peace be with her. WHEN CRABS ROAR Feb 2012 #18
That is a great photo. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #20
She needs to learn Johnson20 Feb 2012 #29
That is awesome! Nt xchrom Feb 2012 #33
Did you explain to her that a court marshal isn't the same as the "military tribunals"? jeff47 Feb 2012 #34
kr Norrin Radd Feb 2012 #35
Actually, I would bet she has plenty of other things to do.... vanlassie Feb 2012 #41
 

saras

(6,670 posts)
24. Everyone I know of who he put "at risk" were criminals, traitors, or both. What's "OK" for them?
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 04:51 AM
Feb 2012

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
30. Why are you spreading misinformation?
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 01:06 PM
Feb 2012

Bradley Manning put NO ONE at risk. In fact, he's probably saved numerous lies by exposing these travesties. The military industrial complex really doesn't need your help in spreading lies. They do a damned good job of that themselves.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
2. I admire her attitude...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:54 PM
Feb 2012

but Manning (and every other military member) knew all along that he was subject to court-martial for breaking the law while in the military.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
9. But what if he didn't break the law?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 06:26 PM
Feb 2012

What if Manning is being used as a scapegoat to cover up the crimes that were exposed by Wikileaks, his "trial" intended to be a distraction (and a darned successful one, I have to admit) from the culpability of our military in breaking the law?

jmowreader

(50,562 posts)
19. The law he broke is pretty clear-cut
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:22 AM
Feb 2012

"Thou shalt not provide classified information to people not authorized to receive it"...like Julian Assange.

Manning's only defense, and it's unlikely, is if someone else provided the information to WikiLeaks. IIRC Assange has confirmed that Manning did, indeed, provide Assange the information at issue here.

Whether the military broke the law is not the question in this case; the issue is, Manning did break the law.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
22. Neither WikiLeaks or Assange has confirmed that Manning is a source. Never not ever.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 04:08 AM
Feb 2012

For the very fact that WikiLeak sources are anonymous.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
25. There is evidence that Manning is the source.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 07:41 AM
Feb 2012

That Assange never admitted otherwise is immaterial, he is just trying to keep himself from prosecution.

Manning himself has admitted as much that he was the source for the leaks to Adrian Lamo.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
23. Actually, Manning like all accused persons is entitled to a fair trial
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 04:35 AM
Feb 2012

before an impartial jury. He is entitled to present his defense and is only guilty after a verdict has been reached.

Manning was kept in near solitary confinement. I'm sure that by this time he is prepared to confess to anything.

I have no idea what he did or did not do, but he is entitled to due process.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
28. Welcome to the minority view
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 12:43 PM
Feb 2012

Talk of evidence and due process isn't very popular in the U.S. nowadays. And the possibility of the accused being tortured (solitary confinement, lights on for 23 hours out of the day, stripped naked for weeks on end under "suicide watch" surveillance) has been found to be immaterial to any charges prosecutors can think up. We have to protect our empire!

Us commander buzzkills who insist on following the Constitution are increasingly becoming dinosaurs.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
8. Does this work?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 06:19 PM
Feb 2012

Last edited Thu Feb 23, 2012, 08:40 PM - Edit history (1)

http:// solarbus.org/temp/manning.jpg

Remove the space between // and solarbus.


Or this -

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
27. That is the OP's picture that I loaded on my site to post here, because people couldn't see his.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:48 AM
Feb 2012

You can't see the picture in my post, but you can see the second one?
garybeck just reposted the picture from my site. You should see both.

 

Zax2me

(2,515 posts)
15. Yea, he's completely innocent...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:12 PM
Feb 2012

NOT.
Support what he did, but any court would not have a hard time finding his violation of the law.

 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
26. The point isn't guilt or innocence,
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 08:21 AM
Feb 2012

It's that the Fed intends to make an example out of him in what will go down in history as a mockery of justice. This isn't about the government seeking 'justice', it's simply a vendetta.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
37. Concisely put, and well done.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 05:04 PM
Feb 2012

All of us are suspect now. The cyber-eyes spy and spy; they know what we think, if we post on the internet. They know where we live. They control how we will die.

Some people won't even be arrested - it's possible to make someone very ill with cancer by simply installing a micro wave propagator near the person's residence.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
31. What's with the hit and runs? Completely unable to defend your lies?
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 01:09 PM
Feb 2012

People who aren't cowards usually don't have an issue with defending what they say. People who just want to recklessly throw around lies usually go with the hit and run route.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
38. Thank you for pointing out this person's trends.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 05:06 PM
Feb 2012

He or she said they knew of people hurt by Manning's releases, but they cannot substantiate the remark.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
39. The MIC really doesn't need another cheerleader/liar.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 05:29 PM
Feb 2012

They've got enough of those as it is. It really saddens me to see an MIC puppet here on DU.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
34. Did you explain to her that a court marshal isn't the same as the "military tribunals"?
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 03:31 PM
Feb 2012

Court marshal is the normal legal process for someone accused of a crime in the military. Follows the UMCJ. Has been around since we had a military. Has all the "normal" protections for the accused they'd get in a civilian federal court.

What, exactly is she asking for? Manning to be tried in federal court instead?

vanlassie

(5,681 posts)
41. Actually, I would bet she has plenty of other things to do....
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 05:10 PM
Feb 2012

But this is the MOST important thing she had to do this day. Good for her.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On a cold winter morning ...