Sex, Money and Gravitas
Can a woman effectively run the Federal Reserve? That shouldnt even be a question. And Janet Yellen, the vice chairwoman of the Feds Board of Governors, isnt just up to the job; by any objective standard, shes the best-qualified person in America to take over when Ben Bernanke steps down as chairman.
Yet there are not one but two sexist campaigns under way against Ms. Yellen. One is a whisper campaign whose sexism is implicit, while the other involves raw misogyny. And both campaigns manage to combine sexism with very bad economic analysis.
Lets start with the more extreme, open campaign. Last week, The New York Sun published an editorial attacking Ms. Yellen titled The Female Dollar. The editorial took it for granted that the Fed has been following disastrously inflationary monetary policies for years, even though actual inflation is at a 50-year low. And it warned that things would get even worse if the dollar were to become merely gender-backed. I am not making this up.
...
The other campaign against Ms. Yellen has been subtler, involving repeated suggestions almost always off the record that she lacks the gravitas to lead the Fed. What does that mean? Well, suppose we were talking about a man with Ms. Yellens credentials: distinguished academic work, leader of the Council of Economic Advisers, six years as president of the San Francisco Fed, a record of working effectively with colleagues at the Board of Governors. Would anyone suggest that a man with those credentials was somehow unqualified for office?
Sorry, but its hard to escape the conclusion that gravitas, in this context, mainly means possessing a Y chromosome.
Both anti-Yellen campaigns, then, involve unmistakable sexism, and should be condemned for that reason. As it happens, however, both campaigns have another problem, too: Theyre based on bad economic analysis.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/02/opinion/krugman-sex-money-and-gravitas.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss