Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Northerner

(5,040 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:59 PM Feb 2012

Russ Feingold 'Pleased' Anwar Al-Awlaki was Taken Out by Drone Strike

WASHINGTON -- Former Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold, whose lone vote against the Patriot Act made him a hero among civil libertarians, said he has no problem with the killing of U.S.-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in a drone attack in Yemen last fall.

"I'm very pleased that he was taken out," said Feingold, who spoke to The Huffington Post ahead of the Tuesday release of his new book, "While America Sleeps." "I do believe he was part and parcel of al Qaeda. I do think it is legitimate to go after al Qaeda operatives."

The clandestine assassination of an American citizen without a trial sparked a legal and moral debate last year that echoed a similar one after 9/11 as lawmakers drafted the now controversial Patriot Act. A secret Obama administration memo leaked soon after the strike concluded that Awlaki could be legally targeted if it was not possible to capture him alive.

Even as he told The Huffington Post in an interview that "Americans have metaphorically gone back to sleep when it comes to constitutional intrusions in the name of fighting terrorism," the former member of the Senate Intelligence Committee made clear that in Awlaki's case, exceptions should be made.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/22/russ-feingold-anwar-al-awlaki_n_1291593.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russ Feingold 'Pleased' Anwar Al-Awlaki was Taken Out by Drone Strike (Original Post) The Northerner Feb 2012 OP
but do we know he is part Dokkie Feb 2012 #1
You know he had released videos, right? TheWraith Feb 2012 #4
videos saying what? Dokkie Feb 2012 #5
Feingold is also the architect of our current military work in Uganda. Robb Feb 2012 #2
It's already started n/t politicasista Feb 2012 #7
Good enough for me. Feingold earned his cred in the Senate. banned from Kos Feb 2012 #3
Oh! Well . . . if that's a sincere belief, then that's it gratuitous Feb 2012 #6
 

Dokkie

(1,688 posts)
1. but do we know he is part
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:01 PM
Feb 2012

and parcel of al qaeda without any public evidence, investigation or trial. This is really disappointing

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
4. You know he had released videos, right?
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:11 PM
Feb 2012

Far too many people have swallowed this "no public evidence" line. The fact was Al Awlaki had, among other things, released videos exhorting muslims to kill westerners and non-believers, publicly claimed his responsibility for multiple attacks and attempted attacks, as well as having been convicted of conspiracy to commit murder in the death of a French citizen.

 

Dokkie

(1,688 posts)
5. videos saying what?
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:21 PM
Feb 2012

supporting or sympathizing with al qaeda doesn't mean he is part of al qaeda. And why the fuck have we not killed the American Al Qaeda? The one Bill Maher interviewed in his religilous documentary, he seems to be more dangerous that Al Walaki. Makes me very suspicious that he is still alive maintaining a website and publishing magazines on how to attack American.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
2. Feingold is also the architect of our current military work in Uganda.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:01 PM
Feb 2012

He's right on that, too, but I suspect this will send him under the bus on DU, and how.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
3. Good enough for me. Feingold earned his cred in the Senate.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:04 PM
Feb 2012

The journalists who complain were never responsible to constituents.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. Oh! Well . . . if that's a sincere belief, then that's it
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:32 PM
Feb 2012

We can just dispense with all that messiness that quaint old document. Who needs due process and trials, anyway? Far more efficient to just lob a missile at someone and blow them to Kingdom Come. Al-Awlaki was soooo guilty, in fact, that his teen-aged son got snuffed, too. That should teach those bloodthirsty, lawless savages to respect our system of justice, by cracky.

Would Sen. Feingold favor us with a prospective list of exceptions, or can those be granted only in retrospect?

What. The. Fuck.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Russ Feingold 'Pleased' A...