Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 01:48 PM Feb 2012

Rick’s Religious Fanaticism

He's more than a little frightening IMO.

See >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/opinion/dowd-ricks-religious-fanaticism.html?_r=1

"Rick’s Religious Fanaticism

By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: February 21, 2012

Rick Santorum has been called a latter-day Savonarola.

That’s far too grand. He’s more like a small-town mullah.

“Satan has his sights on the United States of America,” the conservative presidential candidate warned in 2008. “Satan is attacking the great institutions of America, using those great vices of pride, vanity and sensuality as the root to attack all of the strong plants that has so deeply rooted in the American tradition.”

When, in heaven’s name, did sensuality become a vice? Next he’ll be banning Barry White.

Santorum is not merely engaged in a culture war, but “a spiritual war,” as he called it four years ago. “The Father of Lies has his sights on what you would think the Father of Lies would have his sights on: a good, decent, powerful, influential country — the United States of America,” he told students at Ave Maria University in Florida. He added that mainline Protestantism in this country “is in shambles. It is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it.” "

See >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/opinion/dowd-ricks-religious-fanaticism.html?_r=1

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sinkingfeeling

(51,457 posts)
1. I had one of his supporters tell me yesterday that I had to believe the
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 01:51 PM
Feb 2012

creation story in the Bible because it was written by 'some one who was there'!

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
9. I can't even imagine your response to that
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 02:07 PM
Feb 2012

I think I would be laughing to hard to even continue the conversation.

sinkingfeeling

(51,457 posts)
15. I just said that there seemed to be two different stories of creation within the
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:05 PM
Feb 2012

first book of the Bible and he walked away.

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
3. These quotes make him sound mysteriously like Jerry Falwell on 9/11.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 01:54 PM
Feb 2012

Yeah, the latter-day Savonarola interpretation works too since he seems to be about "burning the vanities" of our unalienable rights.

Ain't religion grand. As on 9/11, religion stands as an opposer of humanity. (Note, Satan is actually Hebrew for opposer)

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
4. And just WHEN did it become business as usual...
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 01:55 PM
Feb 2012

To have public figures in office or seeking office who clearly
display symptoms of mental illness?

BHN

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
7. My youngest of 3 daughters is an "eclectic pagan" and she could kick the shit out of him.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 02:00 PM
Feb 2012

She's a 2nd degree black belt and fully capable of taking down someone three times her size.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
10. As a Wiccan, these types of people having any power scares the crap out of me
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 02:10 PM
Feb 2012

He is a dangerous person that I hope will never have any control over the lives of others again.

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
14. In a very real sense, he already has-
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 02:17 PM
Feb 2012

His recent rhetoric about who is and who is not a "true" Christian
reminds me very much of the "Either your with us or your against us"
statement that came out during the Bush administration.

The statement was intended to threaten anyone who opposed them.
"Enemy non-combatant" was the insinuation and punishable by law.

Santorum is using the same tactics and should be held to account for it.
He is treading a thin line in suggesting there are the "good" Christians and
the "false" Christians.

How long before some domestic militant group of gun toting "good" Christians
believe God wants them to go to war against the "false" Christians in this country?

I would hold him and his promoters guilty of inciting murder should that happen
and with the things he is saying, it is all too possible a scenario in a country that is
more divided and producing more and more extremist groups.

BHN

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rick’s Religious Fanatici...