Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBooz Allens's $133M VA Award May Be Biased: Report
Booz Allens's $133M VA Award May Be Biased: Report
By Megan Stride - Law360, Chicago (December 21, 2011, 6:37 PM ET)
The government's award of a $133 million contract to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. for U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs information security services may have resulted from a biased bid evaluation process, according to a VA watchdog's report released Tuesday.
In a review, the VA's Office of Inspector General found that the Secure VA-Chief Information Security Officer Support Services acquisition process demonstrated a potential bias because the awarding agency considered a bidder's knowledge of VA procedures and practices as a significant selection factor without disclosing the importance of such knowledge when it asked for bids.
The technical evaluation process therefore favored handing the contract to Booz Allen, the incumbent contractor that had already provided the VA with information assurance and information technology security services for the past two years, according to the report.
The VA ended up awarding the $133 million contract to Booz Allen in September 2010, just 27 days after it issued its bid solicitation, agreeing to pay a premium of $18 million more than one of the other bids and $24 million more than the other, the watchdog said.
The contract award procedures "did not promote full and open competition in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation," the report said....
Full article:
http://www.law360.com/articles/295678/booz-allens-s-133m-va-award-may-be-biased-report
By Megan Stride - Law360, Chicago (December 21, 2011, 6:37 PM ET)
The government's award of a $133 million contract to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. for U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs information security services may have resulted from a biased bid evaluation process, according to a VA watchdog's report released Tuesday.
In a review, the VA's Office of Inspector General found that the Secure VA-Chief Information Security Officer Support Services acquisition process demonstrated a potential bias because the awarding agency considered a bidder's knowledge of VA procedures and practices as a significant selection factor without disclosing the importance of such knowledge when it asked for bids.
The technical evaluation process therefore favored handing the contract to Booz Allen, the incumbent contractor that had already provided the VA with information assurance and information technology security services for the past two years, according to the report.
The VA ended up awarding the $133 million contract to Booz Allen in September 2010, just 27 days after it issued its bid solicitation, agreeing to pay a premium of $18 million more than one of the other bids and $24 million more than the other, the watchdog said.
The contract award procedures "did not promote full and open competition in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation," the report said....
Full article:
http://www.law360.com/articles/295678/booz-allens-s-133m-va-award-may-be-biased-report
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 660 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Booz Allens's $133M VA Award May Be Biased: Report (Original Post)
think
Jul 2013
OP
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)1. Well, they do have an advantage considering their former CEO, now Director of Intelligence Clapper
is in the position of being able to influence Congress regarding what they fund for our 'National Security'. But an old Bush guy like Clapper would never lie, or use his position, to do something like that.
To think that our security is in the hands of these 'Contractors'.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)2. may be biased? That's an understatement.