General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPresident of the United States Mitt Romney!!
I know we get frustrated with President Obama. We hate his Appointments to high level Gov. position
We don't like that he favors corporation
And a list of other things I have read on DU and or been Guilty of posting.
However, I always am able to calm my self by saying President of the United States Mitt Romney
And then I smile because whew, at least that didn't happen!
leftstreet
(36,112 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)You think that the RW'ers would have permitted such a socialistic program to be implemented nationally. Really? "FAIL"
Damn, this conversation is just stupid...as is the premis that Obamacare is a negative issue on it's balance.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Obamacare has been overwhelmingly opposed by Republicans because Obama proposed it, as opposed to the Heritage Foundation that designed it (whole buncha socialists over there, you betcha).
But you are right: this conversation is stupid. Romney wasn't elected and trying to make Obama look better by comparing his actions to a non-event is pointless. Ciao.
leftstreet
(36,112 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Romeny couldn't never have implemented it. And as it tirnes out even a broken clock is correct twice a day, and the plan was able to be implemented and saved lives and is bettering the health of millions of people. Something Romeny wouldn' never have been permitted to implement in any shape or form.
You honeslty think Romeny could have done this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023349331
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)which is essentially the same thing. Previously he claimed that Massachusetts could demonstrate that his conservative plan would work for the nation--the ol' laboratories of democracy doncha know. But since the trogodytes worked so hard to link Obama to the same program rMoney's political needs got in the way and he did his standard weathervane thing.
Would have thought that was obvious to anybody.
pampango
(24,692 posts)The legislature amended Romney's plan, adding a Medicaid expansion for children and imposing an assessment on firms with 11 or more workers who do not offer health coverage. The assessment is intended to equalize the contributions to the free care pool from employers that offer and do not offer coverage. The General Court also rejected Romney's provision allowing high-deductible health plans.
Romney vetoed eight sections of the health care legislation, including a $295-per-person fee on businesses with 11 employees or more that do not provide health insurance. Romney also vetoed provisions providing dental and eyeglass benefits to poor residents on the Medicaid program, and providing health coverage to senior and disabled legal immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid. However, the state legislature overrode all of the vetoes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governorship_of_Mitt_Romney#Health_care
The Democrats in the Massachusetts legislature made many improvements in romney's healthcare proposal. He vetoed all of them. They overrode all of his vetoes. With an 85% majority they could pretty much pass or reject whatever they wanted. So this was more a Democratic law than a republican one.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Don't forget him, because it was his financial roadplan to austerity that Mitt endorsed!!!
Ryan said just yesterday that his financial roadplan to austerity would have improved the economy much more by now, much faster than what has been happening.
I'm not kidding one little bit.
Aristus
(66,452 posts)...well...my dad could beat up your dad, so ha-ha-ha!..."
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)And whether House and Senate Democrats would finally find their voices again.
leftstreet
(36,112 posts)That's a big difference
I'm sure there are others...uh..
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ALL of Bush tax cuts for wealthy would be made permanent.
XL Pipeline would already be approved.
We'd be at war with Iran by the end of 2013.
Much deeper cuts to every government agency but the Pentagon.
Sandy relief would have been slashed.
And we're only in July.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)And they used him very well. The Repubs were happy to keep the train rolling under the blue flag until 2016 when it would be safe to run a another Bush.
Romney was apparently the last person to find out that he was the butt of the joke.
JohnnyRingo
(18,641 posts)Sure it was empty, but that Reaganesque image is the first step to a Republican White House. They get the rest of their instructions in a newsletter from the RNC after (if) they win an election.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)So that corporate interests can't "buy the field" like they've done in too many of our last few elections.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Instead of really crappy, we got barely mediocre.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Do you hate every one of his appointments?
You are right, Rmoney's would have been worse.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,641 posts)My life as a GM retiree would certainly be different. I'm a "taker".
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)Rigid ideologues won't get anywhere in this deeply divided nation.