Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 10:45 AM Jul 2013

SC Justice Ginsburg: "I didn't want to be right (on VRA ruling), but sadly I am."

WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she’s not surprised that Southern states have pushed ahead with tough voter identification laws and other measures since the Supreme Court freed them from strict federal oversight of their elections.

Ginsburg said in an interview with The Associated Press that Texas’ decision to implement its voter ID law hours after the court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act last month was powerful evidence of an ongoing need to keep states with a history of voting discrimination from making changes in the way they hold elections without getting advance approval from Washington.

“The notion that because the Voting Rights Act had been so tremendously effective we had to stop it didn’t make any sense to me,” Ginsburg said in a wide-ranging interview late Wednesday in her office at the court. “And one really could have predicted what was going to happen.”

The 80-year-old justice dissented from the 5-4 decision on the voting law. Ginsburg said in her dissent that discarding the law was “like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”

Just a month removed from the decision, she said, “I didn’t want to be right, but sadly I am.”


read: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/ginsburg-not-surprised-voter-id-laws-vra-gutted.php?ref=fpb


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SC Justice Ginsburg: "I didn't want to be right (on VRA ruling), but sadly I am." (Original Post) bigtree Jul 2013 OP
. bigtree Jul 2013 #1
/ bigtree Jul 2013 #2
What I Jamaal510 Jul 2013 #3
K & R Scurrilous Jul 2013 #4
Where the hell is the outrage over this? Where the hell is Congressional action on this? liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #5

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
3. What I
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:04 PM
Jul 2013

find odd in all of this is that if times are different and the VRA is no longer needed, as the Right claims, then why have they been so anxious to get rid of it? Why fix what isn't broken?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SC Justice Ginsburg: "I d...