Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

srican69

(1,426 posts)
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 01:02 PM Jul 2013

who should Obama appoint for Fed Chair


3 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Paul Krugman
3 (100%)
Anyone else - and Obama is a Corporatist Sellout.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
who should Obama appoint for Fed Chair (Original Post) srican69 Jul 2013 OP
Janet Yellen. nt AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #1
+1 FreeJoe Jul 2013 #13
Elliott Spitzer railsback Jul 2013 #2
Tim Geithner! geek tragedy Jul 2013 #3
snowden nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #4
Janet Yellen, although I love Paul Krugman too. nt octoberlib Jul 2013 #5
Anyone but Larry Summers. roamer65 Jul 2013 #6
seriously? how about larry kudlow then? srican69 Jul 2013 #7
Me! Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #8
if I got the job...I will purposely drive up inflation to srican69 Jul 2013 #9
If you drive up inflation only the rich can absorb the loss of real wealth. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #12
its more complex than that ... srican69 Jul 2013 #14
I doubt Krugman would take it, but there are dozens of equally qualified candidates, Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #10
Anybody but a bankster. hobbit709 Jul 2013 #11

srican69

(1,426 posts)
9. if I got the job...I will purposely drive up inflation to
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 06:47 PM
Jul 2013

Transfer wealth from the rich(savers) to the poor(borrowers)

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
12. If you drive up inflation only the rich can absorb the loss of real wealth.
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 06:55 PM
Jul 2013

Devalue money by 10% and the family with $10k in the bank only has $9k in the bank while the billionaire still has $900 million. it destroys savings and undermines capital for things such as loans and investments; which double-whammies the working class that wants to buy big-ticket items or are hoping for that new factory to open with jobs making big-ticket items.

srican69

(1,426 posts)
14. its more complex than that ...
Thu Jul 25, 2013, 02:50 PM
Jul 2013

most people will have mortgages with fixed payments .. those payments will go down in real terms...secondly although there will be lag .. wages will have to rise roughly to keep up with inflation so in real terms that is a wash ... .. ( Lets assume that SS checks are adjusted for inflation)

secondly - the increase in receipts (in nominal dollars) for the government will make it easier for it to service its debt ...( Remember Government is the biggest borrower)

the people who suffer are retirees who depend on savings , people saving up for college etc ...( Savers in general) .. The biggest losers will be bond holders ( I know that includes pension funds) ....

but overall it helps borrowers ( and hurts savers) .. since the poor or less wealthy will have a greater proportion of liabilities on their balance sheets - the rich will be taking a much more painful blow.


No wonder you have a legion of bond vigilantes ready to scream 'inflation' at the drop of hat ... they are mostly at the service of the very very rich.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
10. I doubt Krugman would take it, but there are dozens of equally qualified candidates,
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 06:51 PM
Jul 2013

with a track record of actually being right, not one of which will ever be mentioned by anyone that matters in DC.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»who should Obama appoint ...