Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 08:13 AM Jul 2013

Mr. Weiner and the Elusive Truth

NYT
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: July 23, 2013

At some point, the full story of Anthony Weiner and his sexual relationships and texting habits will finally be told. In the meantime, the serially evasive Mr. Weiner should take his marital troubles and personal compulsions out of the public eye, away from cameras, off the Web and out of the race for mayor of New York City.


It’s difficult not to feel for Ms. Abedin. The couple deserved privacy as they worked through their problems — and they had it, until they re-emerged in public life and Mr. Weiner decided he was a good fit to run New York City. Mr. Weiner and Ms. Abedin have been saying that his sexual behavior is not the public’s business. Well, it isn’t, until they make it our business by plunging into a political campaign


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/24/opinion/mr-weiner-and-the-elusive-truth.html?_r=0&hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1374667517-PqxZ/JARl5N0JVpcFyYO2Q

His sexual behavior is not the public’s business. Well, it isn’t, until they make it our business by plunging into a political campaign

Hear, hear!!!!!!!!

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
1. He is an Internet flasher. Grow the fuck up Weiner! Drop out of the race!
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 08:15 AM
Jul 2013

Huma, you can forgive and forget only so long as your creepy ass husband isn't in the public sphere.

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
7. Mode of exposure
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 08:34 AM
Jul 2013

Except for the Internet and Texting, how is he any different than someone who sits in some parking lot and exposes himself?

BillStein

(758 posts)
11. are you kidding?
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 09:07 AM
Jul 2013

Someone who exposes himself in a parking lot exposes innocents to his junk. On the internet, no one can see it except people looking for it.

c'mon, you can find a better argument than that...

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
16. I was referring to the compulsion to expose.
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 10:29 AM
Jul 2013

I guess it would be ok, but ONLY if there is mutual consent and only if you are not a politician who the opposition is looking to destroy.

bcbink

(69 posts)
18. agreed
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 10:55 AM
Jul 2013

He sent it without consent to at least one young woman he was not in a relationship with. That is the same as flashing.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
2. wrong wrong!!!!!!! It says mountains about his insecurities and his character.
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 08:17 AM
Jul 2013

We do not need him representing D's anywhere.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
3. You sex cops need to decide...
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 08:21 AM
Jul 2013

... whether it's "about the sex" or because __________ wasn't "honest" about the sex.

You can't have it both ways.

Puritan oppression is alive and well.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
4. There was no sex as far as anyone knows, so...
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 08:24 AM
Jul 2013

It's his creepy flashing untrustworthy lying ass that is the problem that he faces in running for public office.

BainsBane

(53,056 posts)
20. You'd be amazed
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 11:03 AM
Jul 2013

at the long conversation I had with another member yesterday over this very point when he claimed the guy just likes sex. I said the Weiner didn't have sex. In fact, it looks like he was avoiding sex with his wife in favor of some internet thing. The other member insisted sex did not have to involve another contact with another person.

Response to Little Star (Reply #5)

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
9. You realize nothing. I do not think sex is icky. I have no hang-ups about sex.....
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 09:00 AM
Jul 2013

I hate to burst your bubble, there is such a thing as being a pervert and the hot dog man is one such example. Maybe you perhaps like that perverted shit but most people don't! You need to get a clue.

Response to Little Star (Reply #9)

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
6. how about the guy has no fucking impulse control at all?
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 08:33 AM
Jul 2013

and no judgment.

None.

Oh, and one more point: You're the one who seems to think it's all about sex, dear.

BillStein

(758 posts)
12. exactly
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 09:09 AM
Jul 2013

He knew he was under watch, and still chose to sext his thing.... I wouldn't vote for him because I question his judgement

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
17. had these communications been between him and his wife, everyone here would have defended him
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 10:55 AM
Jul 2013

if between a third party, him, and his wife, most still would have defended it.

The difference is, of course, obvious.

It is not about "the sex".

Do you also accept his promise of help finding a job or his suggesting that they meet in person?

Or is that also puritanical on the part of the rest of us?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mr. Weiner and the Elusiv...