General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMr. Weiner and the Elusive Truth
NYT
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: July 23, 2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/24/opinion/mr-weiner-and-the-elusive-truth.html?_r=0&hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1374667517-PqxZ/JARl5N0JVpcFyYO2Q
His sexual behavior is not the publics business. Well, it isnt, until they make it our business by plunging into a political campaign
Hear, hear!!!!!!!!
boston bean
(36,223 posts)Huma, you can forgive and forget only so long as your creepy ass husband isn't in the public sphere.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)Except for the Internet and Texting, how is he any different than someone who sits in some parking lot and exposes himself?
BillStein
(758 posts)Someone who exposes himself in a parking lot exposes innocents to his junk. On the internet, no one can see it except people looking for it.
c'mon, you can find a better argument than that...
PADemD
(4,482 posts)I guess it would be ok, but ONLY if there is mutual consent and only if you are not a politician who the opposition is looking to destroy.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)He sent it without consent to at least one young woman he was not in a relationship with. That is the same as flashing.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)We do not need him representing D's anywhere.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... whether it's "about the sex" or because __________ wasn't "honest" about the sex.
You can't have it both ways.
Puritan oppression is alive and well.
boston bean
(36,223 posts)It's his creepy flashing untrustworthy lying ass that is the problem that he faces in running for public office.
BainsBane
(53,056 posts)at the long conversation I had with another member yesterday over this very point when he claimed the guy just likes sex. I said the Weiner didn't have sex. In fact, it looks like he was avoiding sex with his wife in favor of some internet thing. The other member insisted sex did not have to involve another contact with another person.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Response to Little Star (Reply #5)
Post removed
Little Star
(17,055 posts)I hate to burst your bubble, there is such a thing as being a pervert and the hot dog man is one such example. Maybe you perhaps like that perverted shit but most people don't! You need to get a clue.
Response to Little Star (Reply #9)
Post removed
Little Star
(17,055 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)transparency page that just got exposed. What a nice guy.
cali
(114,904 posts)and no judgment.
None.
Oh, and one more point: You're the one who seems to think it's all about sex, dear.
He knew he was under watch, and still chose to sext his thing.... I wouldn't vote for him because I question his judgement
DrDan
(20,411 posts)if between a third party, him, and his wife, most still would have defended it.
The difference is, of course, obvious.
It is not about "the sex".
Do you also accept his promise of help finding a job or his suggesting that they meet in person?
Or is that also puritanical on the part of the rest of us?