Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe (somewhat) breathless wait for Britain's royal baby
http://www.latimes.com/news/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-kate-william-baby-20130720,0,6784777.storyAs of this writing, there are few duller spots on the Internet than the live cam that Britain's Telegraph newspaper is aiming at the Lindo wing of St. Mary's Hospital in west London, where the duchess of Cambridge is expected to deliver the heir to the British throne ... sometime. Presumably, maybe, sometime soon.
The scene: A red-brick hospital building, with an entrance through Georgian-style doors. Every once in a while, a passer-by passes by. The random motor vehicle blurs by. Otherwise ... nothing.
"How much longer will the world have to wait?" the Telegraph asked, perhaps a bit peevishly, noting that the former Kate Middleton's due date was actually Friday.
That's the nature of waiting for births, royal or otherwise, and it appears to be driving some of the British media a bit crazy. The Sun tabloid, perhaps best known for its topless Page 3 pinups, found lookalikes for the duke and duchess, William and Kate, and sent the faux royals to the hospital, where they reportedly fooled the assembled media briefly into thinking the real couple were arriving for delivery.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 1646 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The (somewhat) breathless wait for Britain's royal baby (Original Post)
steve2470
Jul 2013
OP
Same here. I am getting so fed up with all the royal baby flak on the news. n/t
RebelOne
Jul 2013
#8
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)1. Haters gonna hate, waiters gonna wait.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)2. Taters gonna tate nt
Aerows
(39,961 posts)4. Skaters gonna skate n/t
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)10. Baiters gonna bait.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)12. Caterers gonna cate?
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)13. Ummm ...
Good try?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)14. LOL!
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)3. Came across this...
Will one take the Tube? Paddy Power gives commuters a shock with royal baby look-a-likes (01 July 2013)
<snip>
"Commuters on the Circle line this morning could be forgiven for thinking they were still dreaming when four giant babies boarded the Tube.
With just 13 days until the royal babys official due date, bookmaker Paddy Power sent four oversized toddlers in nappies and crowns to Buckingham Palace to publicise the royal bets its offering.
The bookie is accepting bets on everything from the new royals hair colour, gender, name, university, career and even the name of their first girlfriend or boyfriend.
Last month alone, Paddy Power saw more than 2,000 bets on the possible hair colour of the future heir, with the current odds on ginger 7/1, brunette 6/4, black 2/1 and blonde 7/2."
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/celebritynews/will-one-take-the-tube-paddy-power-gives-commuters-a-shock-with-royal-baby-lookalikes-8681284.html
<snip>
"Commuters on the Circle line this morning could be forgiven for thinking they were still dreaming when four giant babies boarded the Tube.
With just 13 days until the royal babys official due date, bookmaker Paddy Power sent four oversized toddlers in nappies and crowns to Buckingham Palace to publicise the royal bets its offering.
The bookie is accepting bets on everything from the new royals hair colour, gender, name, university, career and even the name of their first girlfriend or boyfriend.
Last month alone, Paddy Power saw more than 2,000 bets on the possible hair colour of the future heir, with the current odds on ginger 7/1, brunette 6/4, black 2/1 and blonde 7/2."
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/celebritynews/will-one-take-the-tube-paddy-power-gives-commuters-a-shock-with-royal-baby-lookalikes-8681284.html
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)11. ...
steve2470
(37,457 posts)15. wow that's funny and scary lol nt
Gus Lammas
(61 posts)5. If you offered me money to care less.....
...I could not in good conscience take it.
byeya
(2,842 posts)6. + + Talking about the royals, especially in the USA, ignores our Revolution.
Let the fucking Brits pay for these parasites but I don't want to hear about it.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)8. Same here. I am getting so fed up with all the royal baby flak on the news. n/t
muriel_volestrangler
(101,318 posts)7. The Queen's cousin shows the proper attitude:
My girl crush of the week comes quite straightforwardly in the splendid form of 88-year-old Margaret Rhodes. The Queen's first cousin was recently asked by an American news station whether she was excited about the imminent arrival of a new heir to the throne.
"Not terribly," she replied. Warming to her theme, she pointed out with admirable precision that, "Well, you know, everybody has babies. And it's lovely, but I don't get wildly excited about it."
Having lived through nine decades of so many royal births, deaths, marriages, divorces and toe-suckings, it is quite clearly going to take more than the miracle of new life to stir Mrs Rhodes's interest.
When it was pointed out to her that the baby would one day be king or queen and that the birth would be a fairly historic event, Mrs Rhodes replied: "Yes, all right. I'm prepared to be excited."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jul/21/renault-weather-duchess-of-cambridge
"Not terribly," she replied. Warming to her theme, she pointed out with admirable precision that, "Well, you know, everybody has babies. And it's lovely, but I don't get wildly excited about it."
Having lived through nine decades of so many royal births, deaths, marriages, divorces and toe-suckings, it is quite clearly going to take more than the miracle of new life to stir Mrs Rhodes's interest.
When it was pointed out to her that the baby would one day be king or queen and that the birth would be a fairly historic event, Mrs Rhodes replied: "Yes, all right. I'm prepared to be excited."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jul/21/renault-weather-duchess-of-cambridge
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)9. Wait - she was only due on Friday?
Lawsy, people are making it sound like she was due back in June.