General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo do you think Zimmerman should have just took his ass whoopin'?
http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/rachel-jeantel-trayvon-martin/51e5784b2b8c2a08d90000f5
Interviewer: "So if I understand you right, your depiction of what happened is that George Zimmerman is pursuing Trayvon..."
Rachel: "Yes."
I: "...At some point a fight breaks out. Who swings, who hits who first, in your mind?"
R: "In my mind... I believe Trayvon. It was Trayvon. 'Cause like I said it was a headset. I know Trayvon. That headset always over by his chest area. And I was on the phone. Why would Trayvon leave me on the phone if he going to start something? That's a black... well not a black situation, any teen situation. 'Imma call you back, I gotta go handle something.' Trayvon had not said nothing to me. The only thing is... 'Okay, I'm at the back, almost by my daddy fiance house.' Wow."
I: "So why do you think he... if Trayvon swung first, what do you think Zimmerman did to make him swing first?"
R: "I think Zimmerman is a wannabe cop. Tryna say, 'Oh, I got you."
I: "Do you think he pulled his gun out?"
R: "No, I believe he tryna..."
I: "Grab him?"
R: "...Grab him. 'I got you. You comin' wit me.' And that's a teenager. You did not say you an officer. In his black, all black, the whole area was black. 'Who are you? Why are you touching me?'''
I: "You said something last night on Piers Morgan. You said that what Zimmerman should have done... you said there's something called 'whoop ass' and that he should... I laugh. You made me laugh out loud with that. You said that's what... he should have just took the ass whoopin', right? What did you mean by that? What did you mean by that?"
R: "Ass whoopin' and how the defense attorney say, 'Oh, Zimmerman just got BEATEN,' not... no, that's just called ass whoopin'."
I: "But Trayvon... George Zimmerman's defenders would say if he didn't pull out a gun, if Trayvon was whoopin' his ass, he could have killed George Zimmerman."
R: "No. Trust me: that's not killin'. You have a big bruise. You don't see inside your skin. You might have a little stitches. This normal teenager. Yeah, you might have a little hit, but who started it? You started it. You caused this situation."
I: "So you're saying Trayvon would have, may have, wanted to fight, he wouldn't have tried to kill George Zimmerman?"
R: "No. No. He woulda fight him and then run."
21 votes, 5 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes, even if Trayvon actually started the fight, Zimmerman was asking for it and he should have just took his ass whoopin' | |
15 (71%) |
|
I can't believe this chick was the star witness for the prosecution; these quotes alone raise reasonable doubt that Zimmerman may have feared for his life | |
6 (29%) |
|
5 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Pale Blue Dot
(16,831 posts)Ever thought about working for the Republican Party?
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Pisces
(5,599 posts)yardwork
(61,622 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Further the "chick" reference in one of the options is way wrong.
Polls like this make DU's polling feature seem worthless. Sorry.
Maybe you should self-delete and try again, this time creating a useful poll.
Sivafae
(480 posts)By the 911 operator and let the police investigate the matter. Though no part of me believes that Trayvon would have been safer.
Eta, replied in the wrong place. Stupid "smart" phone.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)just FYI
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The police dispatcher said "we don't need you to do that."
Is this where we can get in a mot argument over what the meaning of is is.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)"are you following him?"
The meaning of IS, is perhaps important, because at the point when the dispatcher asked that question, Zimmerman WAS ALREADY following Trayvon.
So the statement, that "Zimmerman was told not to follow Trayvon, but he got out of his car anyway" is false. It puts the cart before the horse.
This is a basic fact about the case that should be well known, but too many people are spreading falsehoods and too many other people are repeating them.
hunter
(38,314 posts)... and masturbated to gun porn in front of his computer or whatever the hell it is he usually does.
Lisa D
(1,532 posts)I hope, for your sake, no one ever kills your child and then people on the internet, like you, *mock* his/her death.
Grow up.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)Two little cuts do not a whooping make. Nice try.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)demmiblue
(36,855 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)You can't simply assume that the whooper isn't going to leave the whoopee crippled or dead. In such a situation, it's reasonable to assume your life (or long-term health) is in danger, and to do whatever it takes to prevent that.
The problem I have with Zimmerman's use of deadly force is that it was used in a situation he brought about. I think that responsibility for the incident begins with him, not Trayvon Martin. The law isn't written that way, but that's not the first time the law has found itself at odds with ethics.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)If Zimmerman had not taken off after Martin -- scaring him into defending himself, ticking him off, Zman starting the physical confrontation, or whatever happened -- Trayvon would still be alive. I don't think the "who was on top" stuff really has anything to do with whether or not Zimmerman was legally or morally at fault. Zman created the stituation, handled it completely wrong, and was darn sure guilty of something serious.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)It fails to take into account who initiated the conflict, and that's just insane.
In addition, I don't think the majority of jurors realize how much freedom they have in terms of adherence to instructions from the bench. Unsurprisingly, the courts don't make it a priority to fully inform a jury of this. Might not have made a difference in the Zimmerman trial (and certainly not for that jackass B37), though.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)But the law says that the person who hits first is the aggressor.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)And since Zimmerman chased him down and confronted him, yes, he should have been prepared for Martin to defend himself, and that's what Martin did though Zimmerman killed him before there was any chance for an ass whopping he well deserved. Yet he kills Martin and walked free from it.
BronxBoy
(2,286 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I thought the statements some people were making about her were absolutely repulsive. About her appearance, her way of speaking, etc...she did nothing to deserve scorn.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Yeah, don't know what happened but the earth's axis of rotation must have changed or something recently.
Have a nice day.
And I'm sure that the same folks flocking to defend trips to a nail salon and unsupervised visits to a supposedly sequestered jury on the grounds that they were "thrust into their roles" will no doubt rush here to defend a teenager who was held up to national ridicule because she was talking to her friend on the night he was murdered
Not holding my breath
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)(if indeed it happened that way) rather than KILL the kid.
He did ask for it. He could have gone to Walmart without doing anything - then the kid ends on on the couch at home drinking iced tea. His life goes on.
He could have let the cops handle it after they called him. Then the kid ends up harassed by cops for doing nothing and eventually back home. His life goes on.
He could have just followed the kid home at a long distance and seen that he indeed just lived in that neighborhood and was doing nothing wrong. The kid's life goes on.
Whatever confrontation did occur, he had several chances to back away or halt the confrontation. The cops get there and defuse it. The kid's life goes on, even if he gets arrested for assaulting his attacker (likely in that situation.).
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)For recently unfrozen cavemen or others who have never encountered American law before, there is no such thing as reasonable doubt of a defendant's version of events.
Even in a state where self-defense is an "affirmative defense," meaning the defense must meet a standard, that standard is preponderance of the evidence, not the (much higher) reasonable doubt threshold.
No individual in American law ever has to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt, in criminal or civil law.
The reasonable doubt burden is peculiar to the State in criminal prosecutions.
dkf
(37,305 posts)They don't believe in a right to self defense if you have a gun.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)a friggin bigot with a gun.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Therefore, Zman murdered Trayvon.
dkf
(37,305 posts)yardwork
(61,622 posts)Zimmerman lied. Trayvon didn't smash his head on concrete 20 or 30 times. If he had, Zimmerman would be in a coma.
Zimmerman lied. He's a liar and a killer.
Yavin4
(35,441 posts)IOW, you have the right to murder anyone that you get into a fight with.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)looked like IF, as he lied, he was beaten within an inch of life.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023254619#post1
dkf
(37,305 posts)Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)I am NOT one to claim racism but this HAS to be the explanation because NOTHING else explains it. Dumbass fuckery!
Response to Ecumenist (Reply #93)
Post removed
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 21, 2013, 04:58 PM - Edit history (1)
he should have had some evidence of what he claimed...NO GOOSE EGGS, BLACK EYES OR BROKEN NOSES, You on the other hand, seem to be happy that a an innocent kid is pushing up daisies by your stretches & contortions to defend a lying child molesting MURDERER!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Anyone pounded into cement would have them almost instantly.
This whole incident sickens me, particularly those who defend Zimmerman.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Not creeped around like a hood wearing pervert.
dkf
(37,305 posts)I didn't realize that was such a pervasive fear nowadays. Do all men feel this way?
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)If a 6 footer needs to be scared, all males should be.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)How "bout Herb Baumgartner or Wayne Williams or JEFFREY DAHMER? No? What about David Betts in the UK who RAPED another man HE KNEW at KNIFEPOINT? Doesn't ring a bell?
Then surely, you've heard of this:"THIS IS not an isolated case. In Glasgow a man says: 'I can only tell you about the pain, because pain is all I feel.' Two years ago he was dragged on to a field at dusk by three men, one of whom he knew.In Birmingham, a man who was raped and beaten by a stranger in a park at nightfall says his life has been ruined.
Don't recall? Well how about this:In the UK in May, a man was assaulted on the London Underground. Between August and November men were raped in Kent, Barrow-in-Furness, Cardiff, Manchester, and Birmingham. In the London area there were attacks in Croydon, London Bridge, Streatham, Finsbury Park and Piccadilly Circus. Last month a 30-year-old man claimed he was raped by a gang of drunken soldiers near army barracks in Aldershot.
Don't have anything to say? Hmmm. What about this: Men RAPING other MEN in the AMERICAN MILITARY! It's been all over the news and I find it hard to believe that all the rapists were 7 ft tall 400 lb gorillas attacking 5'6" 98 lb weaklings. RAPE is ALWAYS a crime of VIOLENCE, POWER & DOMINATION. What all these crimes have in common is the creep has power on his side, ( a group of perverts that he claims membership in, a WEAPON or IMPLIED power, ie, a commanding officer etc)...I don't know if that was the ULTIMATE aim of that motherfucker but Trayvon had EVERY RIGHT TO BELIEVE THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE INTENT!
Greg Jeloudov was a 35 year old Russian Immigrant and joined the military in his new country. He was taunted by his fellow recruits for being Russian born and after 2 weeks in the barracks, HE WAS GANG RAPED BY OTHER MEN!
Remember when men NEVER rape other MEN & BOYS? Yeah, me neither.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)However long Trayvon wished to keep beating him? At what point would Trayvon have stopped?
Pisces
(5,599 posts)up his arms or punched back?? Fists vs bullets?? Hmmmm
dkf
(37,305 posts)It doesn't take 2 minutes for a lethal blow. That could be instantaneous.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)IF he'd suffered the well deserved ass whipping ...as he claimed
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023254619#post1
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Why is that so hard to understand??
Scuba
(53,475 posts)GZ should have been at home. Where's that option?
Spazito
(50,349 posts)you must be using an excavator now as a shovel can't do the job any more.
Despicable post/poll, imo.
blm
(113,063 posts)of mind doesn't deserve justice because he was too young to own a gun.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)your negative attention backpack not full enough?
Lonely, need to be the centre?
jesus!!!
unrec this p.o.s. flamebait post.
Ohio Joe
(21,756 posts)At Sun Jul 21, 2013, 08:58 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
So do you think Zimmerman should have just took his ass whoopin'?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023307493
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Inflammatory push poll. Over the top inappropriate for DU.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jul 21, 2013, 09:04 AM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: this is stupid
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No... I do not believe a poll like this belongs on DU either. Hide. Ohio Joe
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It is threads like this that demand the unrec button be brought back!
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)That caused the death of a teenager who was simply minding his own business. Martin may have been able to deal with things smarter, but it was still Zimmerman who initiated the confrontation and Zimmerman who brought the gun into the equation.
ShadowLiberal
(2,237 posts)There's a rule with self defense that turns it into assault or murder if you keep fighting back or use excess force when defending yourself.
I can't think of a better example of excessive force then using a gun against someone armed with only bare fists.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)You just have to be in a position where you have a reasonable fear of death or serious injury. People can and are killed everyday by bare hands, pillows and all sorts of objects everyday.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)or whether that was only something that can be applied to cops and military.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)If not then there are charges going from battery all the way up. Not sure if some states have laws governing excessive force specifically but its a good question. Though the last thing anyone thinks off when they are being beaten is am i about to use excessive force you are yo busy trying to stop the attack. Its a very grey area that always has serious monday morning quarterbacking.
ceonupe
(597 posts)Bare hands and feet killed more people last year than rifles.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)ceonupe
(597 posts)And he should have never got out of his car.
We are all attempting to apply adult logic to a child/teen who just started out in the world and a man scared and suspicious of black males specifically ones that according to him "look out of place". I guess to Zimmerman the only black males place is simply ball courts rap videos and police line ups.
My point was simply fists can and do cause great bodily harm everyday in America a person is arrested for murder using them.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Sorry, but that RWing talking point is a boldface lie.
ceonupe
(597 posts)Attempting to make that hands/fist aren't/can't be deadly
And yes the facts are right more people killed by hands than rifles (that should be obvious as rifles usually aren't the weapon of choice for street crime the major factor behind most gun violence but still the facts are facts)
And what I am saying is many rapist use hands a fist and no weapon to archive their goals. And I would want a woman in that position to use a gun if that was her only choice besides laying there and just taking it.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)Because it's not very good.
greyl
(22,990 posts)you would not have been forced to post this stupid poll.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)greyl
(22,990 posts)Repeat it to yourself till it clicks.
Lex
(34,108 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)wundermaus
(1,673 posts)He profiled a kid walking down the street as a criminal without any actions, justification, evidence, except his appearance.
He followed the kid when he was instructed by a representative of the police department not to.
He got out of his car and physically confronted the kid without identifying that he was the neighborhood watch coordinator.
He knew he was carrying a firearm, was trained on how and when to use it and yet he confronted a stranger on the street.
It doesn't take a genius to see the intent Mr. Zimmerman had: he was going to detain a "suspect" until police arrived but the situation got out of control so he shot the kid and killed him. Sounds like second degree murder to me. Lucky for Mr. Zimmerman I was not on that jury.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)was younger. Nobody died, and some got their ass beat. Settling things with your fist use to be the way things were done.
Now it's pull out your gun and shoot. He was weak and a coward. He feared for his life because a black teenager was kicking his
ass. He could have cried uncle and Trayvon may have laughed and left.
He chose to shoot someone. he had a gun. I also read that maybe Trayvon did see the gun and that is when he feared for his life
and started fighting in earnest. Either way both may have feared for their life because one jackass brought a gun to the fight.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)is no reason to continue to misrepresent WHAT SHE IS SAYING.
Rachel is saying: NO, Trayvon did not start the fight. If he had, he would have mentioned to her that he was going to. It makes more sense to her that a wannabe cop grabbed Trayvon and Trayvon tried to GET AWAY. And that his minor injuries were the stuff of playground fights.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I believe that while he was chasing Trayvon , he ran into a tree or tree branches. He admitted in his re enactment video that he tripped and fell (something which no one paid attention to) and injured himself that way. I think TM was struggling to get away from GZ and perhaps rolled on top of him somehow, but I don't think TM ever struck GZ or went for his unseen gun.
GZ killed that young man for no other reason than because he wanted to.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)and Z was heard screaming for help for almost a minute in one of the 911 calls?
Interesting theory.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)that "it doesn't sound like me".
Rex
(65,616 posts)Kewl story bro!
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)The much deserved ones
polichick
(37,152 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I'd like to truly answer your post, but what I have to say to this type of BS question would just get hidden.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)And I'd like to say what I hope happens to George Zimmerman, but I might get banned for that.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Yavin4
(35,441 posts)You should not be allowed to claim self defense if you provoked the confrontation.
Do start shit. Won't be shit.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)but now it seems every Tom, Dick, Harry and Jane bring guns to a fist fight.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Asking a kid in the dark what he was doing when all he was doing was walking home from buying candy. Didn't identify himself. I think he grabbed Trayvon's sweatshirt. You bet he deserved an ass whoopin. But he pulled out a gun and murdered a child.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)egduj
(805 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Z was getting beaten up at all.
Are you admitting Z had reason to fear for his life?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)dick-headed statement!
When did you stop beating your broccoli, by the way?
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Now and forever, I will remember Xemasab as the one who posted this nonsense ...
Too bad ...
FunkyLeprechaun
(2,383 posts)I'm glad I live in a country where carrying a firearm is illegal.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)all there was, was a scared teenager trying to get away from the guy with a gun..
Rachel was never properly prepared to testify.
As soon as she was identified as a phone witness, she should have been contacted by the prosecutors and told to STFU..
Unfortunately, 45 days passed and other lawyers/media got to her first and she said too much "on the record" that could be used against her eventual testimony..
I hope people paid attention, and from here on in, say NOTHING to ANYONE except ON THE RECORD to police (with copy given to you ..or transcript)..
Loose lips sink ships
I know she meant well, but she did not have good guidance .
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)they better pray I don't have a gun, knife or any other weapon, because I have no qualms about using it. Don't care if you're white, black or green. I'm not required to take a beating no matter what I said.