Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRobert Reich: We Need to Stop Subsidizing Sky-High CEO Pay
http://www.alternet.org/economy/stop-subsidizing-sky-high-ceo-payAlmost everyone knows CEO pay is out of control. It surged 16 percent at big companies last year, and the typical CEO raked in $15.1 million, according to the New York Times.
Meanwhile, the median wage continued to drop, adjusted for inflation.
Whats less well-known is that you and I and other taxpayers are subsidizing this sky-high executive compensation. Thats because corporations deduct it from their income taxes, causing the rest of us to pay more in taxes to make up the difference.
This tax subsidy to corporate executives from the rest of us ought to be one of the first tax expenditures to go, when and if congress turns to reforming the tax code.
We almost got there twenty years ago. When he was campaigning for the presidency, Bill Clinton promised that if elected hed end the deductibility of executive pay in excess of $1 million.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1241 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (25)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Reich: We Need to Stop Subsidizing Sky-High CEO Pay (Original Post)
xchrom
Jul 2013
OP
I've brought this up several times and am pleased to do so again: Cap the deductibility at
byeya
Jul 2013
#4
Pissing in the wind. When the head of the country does nothing to rein in corporations, well...
Safetykitten
Jul 2013
#5
Blanks
(4,835 posts)3. Give the president a democratic controlled congress. eom
byeya
(2,842 posts)4. I've brought this up several times and am pleased to do so again: Cap the deductibility at
the rate the President of the United States gets.
It's simple, understandable and fair. Should be an easy sell if hammered home.
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)5. Pissing in the wind. When the head of the country does nothing to rein in corporations, well...
that's about it. Wall Street, big corporations, the HC conglomerates, well, just about everybody knows that this is crime-time and nobody gets caught.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)6. How Bill Clinton Helped Boost CEO Pay
How Bill Clinton Helped Boost CEO Pay
A law he championed to curb compensation has backfired -- and pay packages have exploded
Bill Clinton had what he thought was a great idea to curb the soaring paychecks of the nation's executives. It was 1991, shortly after the launch of his Presidential campaign, and he had just read a best seller on corporate greed by compensation guru Graef Crystal.
Clinton's brainstorm: Use the tax code to curb excessive pay. Companies at the time were allowed to deduct all compensation to top executives. Clinton wanted to permit companies to write off amounts over $1 million only if executives hit specified performance goals. He called Crystal for his thoughts. "Utterly stupid," the consultant says he told the future President.
THE SHAME GAME
Now, 13 years after Clinton's plan became law, the results are clear: It didn't work. Over the law's first decade, average compensation for chief executives at companies in Standard & Poor's 500-stock index soared from $3.7 million to $9.1 million, according to a 2005 Harvard Law School study. The law contains so many obvious loopholes, says Crystal, that "in 10 minutes even Forrest Gump could think up five ways around it."
From the Internal Revenue Service to corporate boardrooms, Clinton's remedy has become the biggest inside joke in the long history of efforts to rein in executive pay. It has allowed companies to take deductions for executive pay tied to goals as vague as "individual achievement of personal commitments" (BellSouth Corp.(BLS ) or improving "customer satisfaction" (Dell Inc. (DELL )). Energy giant AES Corp. (AES ) for a time demanded that its top people maintain a workplace that was "fun."
"We were trying to shame companies into changing their behavior," says former Clinton senior adviser Bruce Reed. "And companies have been shameless in ignoring what we did." Or perhaps just astute in exploiting the flimsiness of Section 162(m) of the IRS code, as the measure is formally known. Reed acknowledges that the Clinton team deliberately watered down the proposal to make it more palatable by, for example, not applying the performance requirement to the award of stock options. Clinton did not return calls for comment.
- more -
A law he championed to curb compensation has backfired -- and pay packages have exploded
Bill Clinton had what he thought was a great idea to curb the soaring paychecks of the nation's executives. It was 1991, shortly after the launch of his Presidential campaign, and he had just read a best seller on corporate greed by compensation guru Graef Crystal.
Clinton's brainstorm: Use the tax code to curb excessive pay. Companies at the time were allowed to deduct all compensation to top executives. Clinton wanted to permit companies to write off amounts over $1 million only if executives hit specified performance goals. He called Crystal for his thoughts. "Utterly stupid," the consultant says he told the future President.
THE SHAME GAME
Now, 13 years after Clinton's plan became law, the results are clear: It didn't work. Over the law's first decade, average compensation for chief executives at companies in Standard & Poor's 500-stock index soared from $3.7 million to $9.1 million, according to a 2005 Harvard Law School study. The law contains so many obvious loopholes, says Crystal, that "in 10 minutes even Forrest Gump could think up five ways around it."
From the Internal Revenue Service to corporate boardrooms, Clinton's remedy has become the biggest inside joke in the long history of efforts to rein in executive pay. It has allowed companies to take deductions for executive pay tied to goals as vague as "individual achievement of personal commitments" (BellSouth Corp.(BLS ) or improving "customer satisfaction" (Dell Inc. (DELL )). Energy giant AES Corp. (AES ) for a time demanded that its top people maintain a workplace that was "fun."
"We were trying to shame companies into changing their behavior," says former Clinton senior adviser Bruce Reed. "And companies have been shameless in ignoring what we did." Or perhaps just astute in exploiting the flimsiness of Section 162(m) of the IRS code, as the measure is formally known. Reed acknowledges that the Clinton team deliberately watered down the proposal to make it more palatable by, for example, not applying the performance requirement to the award of stock options. Clinton did not return calls for comment.
- more -
Originally posted here http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3126151&mesg_id=3126783
The original link is dead, but the full piece can be found here: http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2006-11-26/how-bill-clinton-helped-boost-ceo-pay
Report: Federal Defense Contractors Paid Almost Double Obamas Salary
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023082217
Obama seeks to limit top pay for federal contractors
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022927167
raccoon
(31,127 posts)7. rec'd. nt
Andy823
(11,495 posts)8. The big problem
We have the best congress that corporate "MONEY" can buy, so until we get rid of those people who vote the way their corporate masters tell them to, nothing will change.
Congress has to be "changed" if we want real change to happen, and the only way to do that is to get out the voters and fire the clowns that continue to put the welfare of the corporations over that of the people!
Response to xchrom (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed