General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums• Krugman: Greenspan is an idiot
What really distinguishes Greenspan here are two things. First, his reaction to the fact that even in 2010 it was obvious that markets werent performing according to his predictions:
This is regrettable, because it is fostering a sense of complacency that can have dire consequences
My analysis cant be wrong, the markets are just misbehaving!
And, above all, the fact that for many years this guy was regarded as the Maestro, a man of almost supernatural wisdom and judgment.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/17/the-prophecies-of-maestrodamus/
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
liberalmike27
(2,479 posts)They say "It will be better for 'us' if we do (whatever)."
Some trust them, that they are included in the 'us' in question. But what they mean by 'us' is 'the rich.'
Distrust the pronoun, as you might not be included, or you may be included in the bad ones. "America" is another abused word, as the rich often they "they" are America, that America doesn't include all of "us."
Laelth
(32,017 posts)And those of us on the left are completely discredited in the circles of power, as you delicately imply above. What to do about that, I have no idea, but my goal is to convince our ruling oligarchs that a healthy dose of liberal policy would go a long way toward making them (the oligarchs) a lot richer while, at the same time, making the rest of us a lot happier.
More on this here: http://laelth.blogspot.com/2011/01/turning-american-ship-of-state.html
-Laelth
pansypoo53219
(20,987 posts)and not to INFLATION. i have nver bought into his 'brilliance'. ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW is he was an acolyte of ayn rand + he didn't expect wall streeters to be GREEDY FUCKS.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Greenspan is a psychopath.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)You can read it as them being stupid beyond measure, or fathomlessly evil.
I vote option 2.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)was always that everything would sort itself out through some abacadabra market magic without him doing a thing: that is, he finally told us, after many years of uttering occasional cryptic crap that caused his admirers to swoon, that he had really been doing nothing at all except collecting his big fat paychecks
Think about it: that smirking shirker picked up $180K a year merely to look serious and mumble some meaningless malarkey every few months
It's disgusting
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)there is no need for a "leader". It is when things get tough that the skills of a leader become critical.
byeya
(2,842 posts)and spend as much as he wanted on the MIC. Surpluses are dangerous. Clinton was naughty for creating a budget surplus.
Bubble, what bubble?
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Greenspan had a lot of fun riding the bubble as it inflated, now he's having to pay for that ride with his diminished reputation.