Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:54 PM Jul 2013

So,,,,

there is flaw in the self defense law of FL and most other Red Moocher states. As long as you are the only witness. you can legally kill someone by claiming if was self defense. One thing the Red State Moochers do not realize is that this will apply to all. It will only be a matter of time before the thugs will figure out that they can legally kill a white rich kid, by being the only witness to the killing, and claiming their life was in danger and they had killed the rich kid in self defense. .

Only a matter of time!

Never go to Florida without a fire arm. !

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So,,,, (Original Post) Cryptoad Jul 2013 OP
Over the top. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #1
Woof! MineralMan Jul 2013 #2
just Cryptoad Jul 2013 #4
You'll do what you want, I'm sure. MineralMan Jul 2013 #5
like you say Cryptoad Jul 2013 #7
How many white rich kids do you suppose are killed by [black] thugs? Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #20
I have no idea,,, Cryptoad Jul 2013 #23
You're the one who seems to think it's a problem. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #34
I told you I didn't know Cryptoad Jul 2013 #38
But it's only a problem when rich white kids die, right? Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #39
No that is not what I am saying Cryptoad Jul 2013 #45
the sd law in Niceguy1 Jul 2013 #42
you need a better source of info Cryptoad Jul 2013 #48
syg is seperate Niceguy1 Jul 2013 #56
the SYG is part of the SD law in FL Cryptoad Jul 2013 #57
who are these mstinamotorcity2 Jul 2013 #3
So ,,,,,, you don't think Cryptoad Jul 2013 #6
You don't get it. When rich white kids are killed the police and the prosecutors Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #8
Didn't realize Connecticut and Massachusetts, among others, were Red States onenote Jul 2013 #9
Thats what i am saying,,,,, Cryptoad Jul 2013 #11
It don't work like that period azurnoir Jul 2013 #10
I am not so sure of that,, Cryptoad Jul 2013 #12
I am azurnoir Jul 2013 #14
Thanks,,, Cryptoad Jul 2013 #24
Those 2 links have everything to do with what you're 'talking about' azurnoir Jul 2013 #35
No ,, maybe you should Cryptoad Jul 2013 #36
I read what you posted azurnoir Jul 2013 #43
Yes there are parts of Florida where Cryptoad Jul 2013 #44
Time has told us azurnoir Jul 2013 #54
this case has a witness Cryptoad Jul 2013 #60
Really cite it azurnoir Jul 2013 #61
you should read your own links Cryptoad Jul 2013 #62
Different link than the one I posted why do you claim it's the same one? azurnoir Jul 2013 #66
completely different link from the one I gave you but that you need to resort azurnoir Jul 2013 #65
That link i gave is part of your link Cryptoad Jul 2013 #68
it was a different link which you attempted to present as the same one azurnoir Jul 2013 #73
Except the police will actually investigate a rich white kids murder... lame54 Jul 2013 #13
Some will some wont Cryptoad Jul 2013 #25
If only. sadbear Jul 2013 #15
"...the thugs will figure out that they can legally kill a white rich kid,". That's a dead giveaway. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #16
A dead give away that someone's got a fresh, steaming pantload? Quantess Jul 2013 #17
He has <100 posts, he's worried about "thugs" killing rich white kids... cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #22
Is the Number of post on DU,,, Cryptoad Jul 2013 #27
Occasionally. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #30
More Telling of What? Cryptoad Jul 2013 #37
In your case, most certainly. Enjoy your stay. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #31
YOur attitude and logic Cryptoad Jul 2013 #49
HuH? nt Cryptoad Jul 2013 #26
See that rock behind you? rrneck Jul 2013 #18
lol!!! nt darkangel218 Jul 2013 #28
Florida Stand Your Ground Law: Blacks need not apply. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #19
So ,, you Cryptoad Jul 2013 #29
Your reading comprehension is a little off. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #32
>>PLONKUS MAXIMUS<< nt stevenleser Jul 2013 #21
I am no Zimmerman defender, but self defense is a basic HUMAN RIGHT... Demo_Chris Jul 2013 #33
I also believe in the right to self defense. Cryptoad Jul 2013 #40
Yeah, I believe Zim was a psychopath. nt Demo_Chris Jul 2013 #41
The test fails when the defendant is black, though Blackford Jul 2013 #46
Im not saying that racism has been wiped out Cryptoad Jul 2013 #50
Are the self defense laws naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #47
It seems that it is mostly only the Red States Cryptoad Jul 2013 #51
Ok but this wasnt stand your ground naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #52
Florida's self defense statute is essentially the COLGATE4 Jul 2013 #53
48 other states do not have the Stand your Ground statues in their Cryptoad Jul 2013 #58
SYG is not the same as self defense. And SYG wasn't COLGATE4 Jul 2013 #63
SYG is part of SD law Cryptoad Jul 2013 #70
You do know that the law you describe as being COLGATE4 Jul 2013 #72
Somehow I doubt that. sofa king Jul 2013 #55
Yes the poor are up Chit Creek Cryptoad Jul 2013 #59
Never go to Florida. PERIOD!! :( Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #64
BTW Boom Sound 416 Jul 2013 #67
You are the one that brings up the Zimmy case Cryptoad Jul 2013 #69
You mention Fl Boom Sound 416 Jul 2013 #71

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
38. I told you I didn't know
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:41 PM
Jul 2013

those numbers. I am not concerned with those numbers ,, I am concern with the flaw in these new SD laws that allow for legal murder.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
48. you need a better source of info
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:30 AM
Jul 2013

the Florida Legislature amended the self-defense laws in 2005, Florida Statutes 776.013, 776.012 (adopting the “Stand Your Ground” law written by the N.R.A., and since 2005, adopted by 30-odd other states)

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
57. the SYG is part of the SD law in FL
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 05:13 PM
Jul 2013

I just gave you the statues, and I have not been talking about the Zimmerman case

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
6. So ,,,,,, you don't think
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:50 PM
Jul 2013

that racist thugs exist? Hate to crash you world but they are out there. I'm just pointing out how this flawed law could possible be used for legal murder.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
8. You don't get it. When rich white kids are killed the police and the prosecutors
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:54 PM
Jul 2013

become very motivated and somebody, guilty or not, will go to jail or be executed.

Edit: Probably the first not rich, not white person they pick up.

onenote

(42,704 posts)
9. Didn't realize Connecticut and Massachusetts, among others, were Red States
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:01 PM
Jul 2013

They have similar self defense laws to Florida insofar as the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not actually have a reasonable and actual belief that they faced imminent death or great bodily harm at the time they used deadly force.

And do you really think that Zimmerman is some sort of criminal genius who figured out a hole in the system that now will be copied by all the other bad guys who never figured it out before?

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
11. Thats what i am saying,,,,,
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 05:17 PM
Jul 2013

its the way the Law is written it leaves open that possibility of being used by the other bad guys who can afford good lawyers......!

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
10. It don't work like that period
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:33 PM
Jul 2013

not how the mind set works "thugs" (must wonder what is meant by that word) follow "rich white kid" it's for only one purpose according to the mind set that acquitted Zimmerman and no "thug" will ever be found not guilty if the victim is white

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
12. I am not so sure of that,,
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 05:25 PM
Jul 2013

now with the burden of proof of self defense entirely on the prosecution ,,,,, if the the thug ( criminal) insures that he is the only witness, any defense lawyer should be able to have the thug found not guilty ot case kicked out!

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
35. Those 2 links have everything to do with what you're 'talking about'
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:37 PM
Jul 2013

the first concerned a Black man who shot a white teenager who was threatening his family on his own property he's in prison, the second one was an example of far racial stereotyping, profiling, and outright bigotry go
both have everything to do with your OP

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
36. No ,, maybe you should
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jul 2013

reread what I posted. It is about a flaw in this SD Law that allows a person to legally murder someone if there are on other witnesses to the crime. You example have nothing to do with that circumstance.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
43. I read what you posted
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 03:45 AM
Jul 2013

but what you're attempting to sell here is that a Black person could get away with killing a "rich white kid" in Florida if there were no witnesses, something that is laughable on it's face, and I think you know that too

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
44. Yes there are parts of Florida where
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:20 AM
Jul 2013

it makes no difference what the law says. But not all of Florida is Gulf county. Time will tell on my prediction.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
54. Time has told us
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 03:14 PM
Jul 2013

Dooley told jurors, "I decided no good can come of this, so I said in a low voice, 'Screw this, I'm going home.' I turned around and started walking back to my house."

He added emphatically, "You would be a fool to even think about starting a fight with [James.]."

But James allegedly followed after Dooley, and quickly the fight turned physical, with the two men wrestling each other to the ground. Seconds later, David James was dead, shot by the 71-year-old.

Dooley said Monday he was simply defending himself that fateful day and that David James, twice his size, was choking him. Dooley said he had no choice but to fire the gun that he had taken out of his right pocket.

Dooley told jurors, "He gave me no other choice. He was killing me. He had me by the neck. I couldn't breathe. He tried to take the gun away from me. If he took the gun away from me, what do you think he would have done with it? I had no other choice. I was on my way home. That's all I wanted to do."

http://www.wtsp.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=283139


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3264623

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
62. you should read your own links
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 10:05 PM
Jul 2013

"The teen told jurors that he did not see James get violent, only that the veteran was on top of Dooley at one point, holding his hands down. "He did not choke him," said Arthur."


http://www.wtsp.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=282747&odyssey=obinsite

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
66. Different link than the one I posted why do you claim it's the same one?
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 12:44 AM
Jul 2013

perhaps you need to read more closely or something

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
65. completely different link from the one I gave you but that you need to resort
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 12:42 AM
Jul 2013

to that sort of ummm tactic speaks volumes

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
68. That link i gave is part of your link
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 10:21 AM
Jul 2013

but it makes no difference,,,,,, it cites that there were witnesses .

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
73. it was a different link which you attempted to present as the same one
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 02:53 PM
Jul 2013

but what it cites and the title of your link is

"Teen skateboarder says in 911 call that shooting was 'my fault!'"

but never fear I'm sure rich White kids have little to fear in Florida, so breathe easy now okay?

lame54

(35,292 posts)
13. Except the police will actually investigate a rich white kids murder...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 05:31 PM
Jul 2013

and gather all the evidence they can

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
22. He has <100 posts, he's worried about "thugs" killing rich white kids...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 07:09 PM
Jul 2013

He's got a steaming pantload o' something, that's for sure.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
30. Occasionally.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:03 PM
Jul 2013

What's more telling though is the number of posts PLUS the notion we should be worried about rich white kids getting killed by "thugs" who think they'll get away with it.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
37. More Telling of What?
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:37 PM
Jul 2013

I never said you just stated . I have been talking about a flaw in this law that allows for legal murder to committed by anyone even racist thugs. You do know what a thugs is don't you ?

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
33. I am no Zimmerman defender, but self defense is a basic HUMAN RIGHT...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 09:19 PM
Jul 2013

I wish people would stop with the red state blue state crap on this one. I happen to think the jury made a bad call in ignoring the many lies that Zimmerman told, but the prosecution did a poor job presenting those lies and making their case.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
40. I also believe in the right to self defense.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 10:49 PM
Jul 2013

but that that does not make these new flawed SD laws a good thing. All of these New SD laws that I am aware on are in the Red states..... maybe they exist in other states but I have no knowledge them..... I do not agree with the jury's verdict either.... He instigated the whole thing,,,, I feel he must have some blame to burden.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
50. Im not saying that racism has been wiped out
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:40 AM
Jul 2013

your case example still had witnesses to the crime... what I said is an hypothetical example where there are no witnesses to contradict the shooter claims of Self defense.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
51. It seems that it is mostly only the Red States
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:46 AM
Jul 2013

that have this flaw in their "stand your ground " laws that allows for legal murder.

 

naaman fletcher

(7,362 posts)
52. Ok but this wasnt stand your ground
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:49 AM
Jul 2013

This was a traditional self defense claim that would have been be same in California or Mass.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
53. Florida's self defense statute is essentially the
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:56 AM
Jul 2013

same as 48 other states. The only exception is Ohio. You're absolutely right.
r

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
58. 48 other states do not have the Stand your Ground statues in their
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 05:16 PM
Jul 2013

SD laws..... Google is your friend

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
63. SYG is not the same as self defense. And SYG wasn't
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:52 PM
Jul 2013

alleged in this case at all. This was tried under traditional self defense statutes, which are almost identical among 49 of the 50 states (Ohio being the exception). Facts are your friends.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
70. SYG is part of SD law
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 10:35 AM
Jul 2013

SYG is added by statues to SD Law. as I have cited

My original post has nothing to do with the Zimmy Case.
My post is about the Law and its flaw.
.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
72. You do know that the law you describe as being
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 12:03 PM
Jul 2013

in effect in Fl and 'red moocher states' is also the law in every other state of the union except Ohio?

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
55. Somehow I doubt that.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 03:29 PM
Jul 2013

The law is designed to protect only the privileged. Rich white kids are privileged, while your hypothetical assailant is not.

This is a corrupt decision, not a functional defense for anyone but the son of a judge. Just like other important but corrupt court decisions, like Bush v. Gore, it will not be allowed as precedent in other cases, because the court system itself will recognize that it's an insider decision and not applicable to the unwashed masses.

Nevertheless, your observation is still quite valid: murdering your adversary and telling authorities the story that best defends yourself is potentially an effective legal tactic... if you have an ace in the hole.

But if you're a minority or poor, it ain't gonna work for you.

It amuses me that one of my favorite bands as a kid, Scream, foretold all of this in a concise double-song during the Reagan era:



They’re never wrong, only mistaken
It don’t replace your rights that have been taken
They throw the book away, you’ve been forsaken
For American justice has just been faking

If you got no money then you’re just out of luck
‘Cause the lawyers and legal aid, they just don’t give a fuck
That’s why the jails are full of the poor and black
And once they get out, you know they end up just going back

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
59. Yes the poor are up Chit Creek
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 05:19 PM
Jul 2013

but i am talking about professional thugs who are far from being poor. many with lawyer on retainers.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
67. BTW
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 12:50 AM
Jul 2013

Because you are probably too young to vote and haven't left your room yet, the red moocher state went blue the last presidential election.

And while your "flaw" is a stroke of zen enlightenment, Florida vs Zimmerman had plenty of witnesses.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
69. You are the one that brings up the Zimmy case
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 10:29 AM
Jul 2013

My post has nothing to do that case.

Whoever sold you your Seer license, Hoo-Dooed you .

Im 65 and have voted in ever election that I was in country.

I never mentioned Florida in my orginal post.

but yes FL was a Red Moocher state when it added the SYG statues to its
SD law

Most State that have added SYG statues are Red Moocher States

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
71. You mention Fl
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 10:41 AM
Jul 2013

In the first sentence of this OP

And

If you want me to believe or anyone to believe you mentioned self defense by coincidence two days after the verdict and while DU is blowing up, please...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So,,,,