General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJelhani Cobbs in the New Yorker: George Zimmerman, Not Guilty: Blood on the Leaves
Last edited Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:31 PM - Edit history (1)
Everything Jelani Cobbs has written about this is totally worth the read.
The not-guilty verdict in the George Zimmerman trial came down moments after I left a screening of Fruitvale Station, a film about the police-shooting death of Oscar Grant four years ago in Oakland. Much of the audience sat quietly sobbing as the closing credits rolled, moved by the narrative of a young black man, unarmed and senselessly gone. Words were not needed to express a common understanding: to Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin, the seventeen-year-old he shot, fit the description; for black America, the circumstances of his death did.
The familiarity dulled the sharp edges of the tragedy. The decision the six jurors reached on Saturday evening will inspire anger, frustration, and despair, but little surprise, and this is the most deeply saddening aspect of the entire affair. From the outset throughout the forty-four days it took for there to be an arrest, and then in the sixteen months it took to for the case to come to trialthere was a nagging suspicion that it would culminate in disappointment. Call this historical profiling.
The most damning element here is not that George Zimmerman was found not guilty: its the bitter knowledge that Trayvon Martin was found guilty. During his cross examination of Martins mother, Sybrina Fulton, the defense attorney Mark OMara asked if she was avoiding the idea that her son had done something to cause his own death. During closing arguments, the defense informed the jury that Martin was armed because he weaponized a sidewalk and used it to bludgeon Zimmerman. During his post-verdict press conference, OMara said that, were his client black, he would never have been charged. At the defenses table, and in the precincts far beyond it where donors have stepped forward to contribute funds to underwrite their efforts, there is a sense that Zimmerman was the victim.
OMaras statement echoed a criticism that began circulating long before Martin and Zimmerman encountered each other. Thousands of black boys die at the hands of other African Americans each year, but the black community, it holds, is concerned only when those deaths are caused by whites. Its an appealing argument, and widespread, but its simplistic and obtuse. Its a belief most easily held when youve not witnessed peace rallies and makeshift memorials, when youve turned a blind eye to grassroots organizations like the Interrupters in Chicago, who are working valiantly to stem the tide of violence in that city. It is the thinking of people whove never wondered why African Americans disproportionately support strict gun-control legislation. The added quotient of outrage in cases like this one stems not from the belief that a white murderer is somehow worse than a black one but from the knowledge that race determines whether fear, history, and public sentiment offer that killer a usable alibi.
<snip>
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/07/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-blood-on-the-leaves.html
PDJane
(10,103 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)nsd
(2,406 posts)You may be thinking of Tehani Coates, but this is Jelani Cobb.