Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGMO Domino Effect
from In These Times:
GMO Domino Effect
Four states to go, and a cascade of food labeling laws will take effect.
BY Jessica Corbett
In June, legislators in Connecticut took a bite out of the secrecy surrounding genetically modified foods.
Connecticut is the first state to pass legislation that requires food manufacturers to label products containing genetically modified ingredients. But the historic legislation, pushed forward by consumer and environmental advocacy groups such as GMO Free CT, comes with a caveat. Before the new law can take effect, four other states, including at least one that borders Connecticut, must pass a similar bill, and a combination of northeastern states with a total population of 20 million must also approve GMO labeling legislation.
This safety-in numbers approach is an attempt to minimize the potential for lawsuits from food manufacturers. Until now, industry has successfully thwarted most attempts by the right to know movement, which emphasizes that the health risks of GMOs are still unclear and that consumers have the right to choose safe food, to pass labeling laws. In Vermont, the threat of a lawsuit from Monsanto halted passage of a similar law in spring 2012. And during the November 2012 elections, California voters rejected Proposition 37, a ballot initiative that would have required GMO labeling, after Monsanto and other biotech companies spent approximately $50 million on advertising against the initiative.
This time around, the push for labeling laws could bear more fruit: Maine has already followed in Connecticuts wake and approved its own labeling law (as in Connecticut, the Maine law is contingent on other nearby states passing their own bills), and 25 other statesincluding all of the northeastern stateshave introduced legislation to require labeling or prohibit the production of genetically engineered foods, according to the Center for Food Safety. ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://inthesetimes.com/article/15225/gmo_domino_effect/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 821 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GMO Domino Effect (Original Post)
marmar
Jul 2013
OP
Catherina
(35,568 posts)1. Rec'd but wait until TPP kicks in n/t
chervilant
(8,267 posts)2. Many, many more of us
need to refuse to buy GMOs! We must help those who are ignorant about GMOs learn why our concerns are merited. We must send a clear message to Monsanto and Big agribusiness that we want healthy, nutritious food raised in eco-responsible ways.
byeya
(2,842 posts)3. I recommend In These Times to all - an excellent magazine and one of the few to seriously
cover labor issues.
I always try and find the words "Non GMO" on the food I purchase