Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stinky The Clown

(67,799 posts)
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:51 PM Jul 2013

Yanno . . . no matter how much you want it to be so, America is NOT post racial.

It wasn't post racial in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, or now, in 2013.

We seem hardly more evolved than we were in the 1920s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90, 00s.

Just because some wanted it to be so - in many ways for purely political motives - doesn't make it so.

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yanno . . . no matter how much you want it to be so, America is NOT post racial. (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Jul 2013 OP
those who ever claimed that were blind bobduca Jul 2013 #1
He only won because of the FUCKING NRA. madinmaryland Jul 2013 #2
And your boogeyman has exactly what Riftaxe Jul 2013 #6
I see that a gungeonite crawled out of the cesspool to comment in DU... madinmaryland Jul 2013 #9
Yet you dodge the question Riftaxe Jul 2013 #13
And yet you are missing the entire reason why this whole thing ever happened. madinmaryland Jul 2013 #16
It is a just verdict Riftaxe Jul 2013 #3
thanks 'teach for the "civics" lesson bobduca Jul 2013 #4
Aye knowing how the 3 branches work Riftaxe Jul 2013 #8
so the letter to the jury re: disregarding all of that testimony bobduca Jul 2013 #11
Maybe, if you are a democrat, you would be fighting against the laws that the NRA madinmaryland Jul 2013 #12
and yet the NRA was no where in the trial Riftaxe Jul 2013 #14
My friend. It was the NRA that created the laws that forced the jury to have to acquit the murderer madinmaryland Jul 2013 #18
This is an uninformed statement uponit7771 Jul 2013 #36
Lord seek help Riftaxe Jul 2013 #17
The NRA forced upon the state of Florida the "stand-your-ground" law. PERIOD. Rather than saying I madinmaryland Jul 2013 #20
The NRA needs to fuck-off, and here... madinmaryland Jul 2013 #21
You do realize Riftaxe Jul 2013 #30
You do realize madinmaryland Jul 2013 #32
Lord yet not one prosecutor or defense attorney was intelligent enough Riftaxe Jul 2013 #33
Huh? Have you understood at all that I am arguing against the law that the madinmaryland Jul 2013 #34
don't you understand, madinmaryland? Skittles Jul 2013 #35
How do you figure? treestar Jul 2013 #10
Because as the law plainly states Riftaxe Jul 2013 #15
BECAUSE as the law plainly states and was written by the NRA... madinmaryland Jul 2013 #22
I suspect you truly believe that Riftaxe Jul 2013 #23
You have yet to refute my assertion and that of most people in this country that the madinmaryland Jul 2013 #24
I do not find the laws absurd Riftaxe Jul 2013 #26
Thanks for actually addressing the points that I made... madinmaryland Jul 2013 #29
I figure it came down to the instruction about the burden of proof treestar Jul 2013 #28
more like the 50s I have in laws now who are openly racist dembotoz Jul 2013 #5
It really is De-Evolution. enigmatic Jul 2013 #7
And who thought this?????? mstinamotorcity2 Jul 2013 #19
Whoever said it was? Iggo Jul 2013 #25
Usually it's the racists who say we're in "post-racial" America Nevernose Jul 2013 #31
No, it certainly isn't. Igel Jul 2013 #27

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
9. I see that a gungeonite crawled out of the cesspool to comment in DU...
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:59 PM
Jul 2013

How about the FUCKING laws that the NRA got passed in Florida that allowed the raging gun-nut to kill someone without any repercussion.

Yes. Go back to your fucking hole.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
13. Yet you dodge the question
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:03 AM
Jul 2013

why was the NRA not brought into evidence, surely it would if we were not dealing with your particluar chosen psychosis.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
16. And yet you are missing the entire reason why this whole thing ever happened.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:12 AM
Jul 2013

If you can't see that it was the NRA spending billions of dollars to promote these "stand-your-ground" rules and FREE GUNS FOR EVERYONE, then you it is not really worth discussing with you.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
3. It is a just verdict
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:55 PM
Jul 2013

from the evidence presented.

Sure it not match up with DU groupthink, but lord how many repeated lies does it take to think it is other then just?

I not fathom, the breast beating just over the verdict.

Remedial civics class is something long overdue, since it apparently has not been taught in the last 40 years.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
8. Aye knowing how the 3 branches work
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:57 PM
Jul 2013

is akin to treason, best to stay uniformed.

A basic understanding can only lead to thoughtless rebellion, when our betters no what to do.

bobduca

(1,763 posts)
11. so the letter to the jury re: disregarding all of that testimony
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:00 AM
Jul 2013

was that the judge basing his instructions on precedent? or his personal choice base on his reading of the case?

please explain why the jury had such specific instructions.. and why if the prosecution was so seemingly inept that this should be celebrated as "justice"

Also do you own a gun?

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
12. Maybe, if you are a democrat, you would be fighting against the laws that the NRA
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:01 AM
Jul 2013

is foisting on this country, and not just la-di-dah-ing the decision the jury was FORCED to make tonight based on the horendous laws foisted on us the FUCKING NRA.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
14. and yet the NRA was no where in the trial
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:04 AM
Jul 2013

While your particular psychosis would require it to be, is that not evidence that your are just a bit loopy about them?

<and no i am not a member>

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
18. My friend. It was the NRA that created the laws that forced the jury to have to acquit the murderer
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:14 AM
Jul 2013

named George Zimmerman. PERIOD.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
17. Lord seek help
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:13 AM
Jul 2013

You still have yet to explain what the hell has the NRA has to do with it other then your delusional ramblings.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
20. The NRA forced upon the state of Florida the "stand-your-ground" law. PERIOD. Rather than saying I
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:16 AM
Jul 2013

am delusional, how about actually refuting my comments, rather than making pot shots at me.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
21. The NRA needs to fuck-off, and here...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:19 AM
Jul 2013

Do a quick search for “Stand Your Ground” on the National Rifle Association’s website and the first video result features the story of a Florida man exonerated of murder charges in January 2012 under the State’s “Stand Your Ground” law. That video’s segment is titled “Hero of the Day.”

The NRA lobbied for “Stand Your Ground” in the past and has yet to comment on the controversy surrounding the killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman, a case in which Florida’s version of the law could play a pivotal role if it ever goes to trial.

The pro-gun group championed the passage of the original law in Florida back in 2004 and lobbied to pass similar legislation in other states, according to the Center for Public Integrity. In light of the recent controversy, the NRA has stalled its lobbying efforts in to pass the law in Alaska, according to Bloomberg News.

“Stand Your Ground” laws state that a person can use lethal force if that person feels at all threatened. Versions of the law have been passed in 25 states, but Florida’s is considered to be the most aggressive.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/nra-pushed-for-stand-your-ground-laws/

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
30. You do realize
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:13 AM
Jul 2013

that SYG was never a part of the trial, right?

Screw it keep listening to glen beck or whatever nutjob you are a fan of.

Just pop into reality every now and then so we know you are ok.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
32. You do realize
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:20 AM
Jul 2013

the whole reason the trial happened was because of "SYG". Had that never been foisted on the state by the NRA and Glenn Beck and what ever other nutjobs you listen to, this whole fucking thing would never have happened.

Now maybe you need to take some reality pills before posting nonsense like that.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
33. Lord yet not one prosecutor or defense attorney was intelligent enough
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:54 AM
Jul 2013

to even smirk at the relevant law in a televised open court? Fascinating.

Surely you find that as hard to believe as i do, but good night and hope you feel better on the morrow.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
34. Huh? Have you understood at all that I am arguing against the law that the
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 02:10 AM
Jul 2013

NRA devised and not the verdict?

I hope you are the one that wakes up from the NRA induced haze in the morning.

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
35. don't you understand, madinmaryland?
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 05:07 AM
Jul 2013

the NRA has infused a gun-nut mentality into America but they are not responsible for the inevitable results! GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!!

treestar

(82,383 posts)
10. How do you figure?
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:00 AM
Jul 2013

How is there reasonable doubt GZ should not have used deadly force?

Kid unarmed, GZ had called the cops and the cops were coming - he knew that. GZ has martial arts training. No blood or DNA on TM's hands.

GZ head cuts show at most a fight but not one that allowed for deadly force.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
15. Because as the law plainly states
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:07 AM
Jul 2013

Threat of bodily harm or death. The prosecution should have made a hell of a better case, but honestly they were coasting, I suspect since the trial was opened via press conference instead of the normal jury that played a lot into it and the decision by the prosecution to not work at the charges explains the outcome.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
23. I suspect you truly believe that
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:27 AM
Jul 2013

So i will just agree to differ.

I still like 90% of your posts if it helps, we just disagree on this one.

Lord who knows how i would come out on a Democratic purity test, but more relevant have you voted for the same candidates i have for the last 40 years? Purity tests are an exercise in futility and a condemnation of intelligence.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
24. You have yet to refute my assertion and that of most people in this country that the
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:32 AM
Jul 2013

NRA has created absurd laws such as the "stand your ground" law in Florida, and that it is these laws that allowed George Zimmerman to murder another human being.

Please explain how you differ with me on this. It is NOT about what the jurors, prosecutors, or the judge did in this case. It is about what the NRA has done to this country. (And I suppose I should include the corporate gun manufacturers.)

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
26. I do not find the laws absurd
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:42 AM
Jul 2013

nor admit that the laws are silly. That the laws can be abused, i think is pretty self evident, exactly how would you change the laws in florida?

As far as the NRA, I view them as politically wrong, but appreciate them for the good they do in safety education, i would never join them since we are completely opposed politically.

As far as the NRA being such a heavy political power, i would think it is hardly true at best.

If we skip to the heart of it, this is more likely a rural thing vs urban, i could never condone a kitty genovese attitude, that is beyond my understanding, yet is so inbred into urbanites that it makes them so odious. Nor do i understand moving into a new community and not joining EMS or the fire department.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
29. Thanks for actually addressing the points that I made...
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:04 AM
Jul 2013

You just admitted in your first paragraph that it is quite evident that the law, that law being the "stand your ground" law can be easily abused. OBVIOUSLY, the easiest way would be to revoke the law and return to the law that worked very well for more that two hundred years. I think that is called the Castle Doctrine.

I am glad you consider the NRA politically wrong, but you should just consider them wrong altogether. You should also know that the NRA is one of the biggest political players out there, right up there with KKK Rove's group and the Koch brothers. That is a fact.

Nice try with your last paragraph. Very sad situation, but for you to pull that sort of bullshit, is very reminiscent of a lot gungeonites that are no longer at DU.

BTW, what the fuck does this mean: " Nor do i understand moving into a new community and not joining EMS or the fire department."

treestar

(82,383 posts)
28. I figure it came down to the instruction about the burden of proof
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:54 AM
Jul 2013

Which was indeed confusing. As finders of fact, even so, I criticize this jury. They had to find it was beyond a reasonable doubt that GZ should not have used deadly force. Maybe they erred in favor of GZ in a close case due to the instructions. Still his story is full of holes and not all that credible.

The prosecution may not have wanted to try the case - only public pressure made them do it.

dembotoz

(16,806 posts)
5. more like the 50s I have in laws now who are openly racist
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:56 PM
Jul 2013

they always were racist but they used to hide it

not anymore

my family just keeps getting smaller

enigmatic

(15,021 posts)
7. It really is De-Evolution.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 11:57 PM
Jul 2013

As long as the traditional media and hate talk radio blare 24/7 about hating anyone who isn't white and christian, it's never going to be post-racial, or post-anything.

mstinamotorcity2

(1,451 posts)
19. And who thought this??????
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:15 AM
Jul 2013

That has never been the case with me. I never thought such a thing. The thing is now you will have people of color gearing our children up for the HATE. We will now let them know that they will Never ever be safe in America. Children of color will never be safe in America. NEVER!!!!!!!!So when you find them stand offish you will know why.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
31. Usually it's the racists who say we're in "post-racial" America
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:17 AM
Jul 2013

Although I'd much rather live in post-racist America.

I see signs in the young people all the time. A change is gonna come, it's just gonna be a long time in coming.

Igel

(35,310 posts)
27. No, it certainly isn't.
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:48 AM
Jul 2013

Used to hope. Saw signs that we were closer.

Last couple of years I realized that we're no closer. Nope.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yanno . . . no matter how...