General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI Was Bothered There Was Not At Least One African American on the Jury
IMO, there should have been at least one African American. I blame the prosecution for that. Hard to believe they could not find him guilty of ANYTHING. I feel so bad for The Martin family tonight.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)(which of course also would have meant a greater chance of a black juror, but that's beside my point).
In how many states is it possible to have only 6 jurors on a criminal trial--not just a criminal trial, but a murder trial? I'll go answer that question for myself after a bit of research; but my understanding is that criminal trials are required to have 12 jurors in most cases.
Response to frazzled (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MH1
(17,600 posts)For going to a store while black.
But yeah, you are providing the technical reason.
I think if there was at least one African American on the jury the verdict may or may not have been different, but yes, it would have been better accepted.
It also might have been better accepted if they'd taken longer to arrive at it. 16 hours really doesn't seem like a very long time to deliberate a case like this.
I would have taken the verdict better had there been an African American on the jury. I still would have been pissed that the coward was set free, but I would not be as upset knowing there was an African American who decided he was not guilty.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)It was a murder case, and I believe that 6 is not standard for that in other states. I sat as a potential juror in a non-death-penalty murder case in Illinois, and twelve jurors were selected.
I make no judgment as to the racial composition of that trial or the reaction to it. I believe a not guilty verdict would have been unjust no matter what jury was seated.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)My thoughts and prayers with the Martins too. I think they have a strong faith that will get them through.
treestar
(82,383 posts)especially. Like the poster above, the 6 person jury appears to be not a good thing either, or this case is evidence of its failings. One AA person could have contributed and brought the perspective.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)Do you think they could decide fairly about justice for him?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and deciding on a fair verdict?
I think I would. Would you?
Skittles
(153,164 posts)I think a lot of men see Zimmerman for the gutless coward he is
Blackford
(289 posts)This is why I cannot trust to be safe in Florida and thus will boycott anything and everything to do with Florida.
romantico
(5,062 posts)This case WAS about racism, despite what the defense and the Zimmerman fans say. You could hear Zimmerman make racial slurs on the 911 tape. So, I believe at if there was at least one African American who heard that it would have made them see things differently.
FarPoint
(12,408 posts)Just look at Herman Cain or Justice Thomas ....those who deny their ancestors history. It's no guarantee of cultural insight.
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)was looking for a bunch of ignorant cracker racists who didn't give a shit about Martin or the law for that matter.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Not necessarily those who look just like you, are your age, are your gender, do what you do for a living, etc.
In fact, it's against the law to reject or select a juror based on race. That's called discrimination.