Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 02:04 PM Feb 2012

Is the payroll tax cut now a permanent thing in essence?

This is the lifeblood of social security and we are reducing its flow when it is needed most. I can't see any administration of any political stripe wanting to raise it back up now.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
1. it needs to be an issue in the 2016 Democratic primary
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 02:08 PM
Feb 2012

I will be looking for a candidate who is committed to Social Security. A candidate who finds Alan Simpson abhorrent for example.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
9. A tax cut repukes don't like? A Democratic Administration pushing for weaking SS funding ?
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 03:06 PM
Feb 2012

I have a feeling it's going to be an issue long before 2016.

librechik

(30,677 posts)
2. we need to address it when it expires this year--
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 02:10 PM
Feb 2012

If unemployment statistics continue to improve, there will be no reason to keep it except to weaken SS.

librechik

(30,677 posts)
4. me too, they don't realize how hard it was to adjust SS for the baby boomers bak in 87
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 02:12 PM
Feb 2012

now they want to cut it just as we hit retirement? wtf

subterranean

(3,427 posts)
6. Whoever lets it expire will be accused of a massive tax hike on the middle class.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 02:42 PM
Feb 2012

Which is pretty much how Obama characterized Republican opposition to the extension this time around.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
8. I think it may be - so we need to start figuring an alternate dedicated tax
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 02:58 PM
Feb 2012

Because we have to pay for SS or it won't be there. This is an insidious way to undercut the Social Security program unless another dedicated tax is set up.

Mind you, this is occurring at a time when CBO is predicting that the DI trust fund is due to run out in 2016, which under current law would force a cut in benefits. We aren't talking about something that's due to hit decades down the line - we are talking about something that impacts this decade.

I don't think we should sleepwalk into this and this is an issue the average voter should try hard to keep on the political radar.

The MWP tax credit provided more of a rebate to lower-income workers and cost less (because it paid nothing to really high-income workers). That was a democratic way to stimulate the economy. This rebate is not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the payroll tax cut no...