General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGetting punched in the nose gives you the right to shoot the person.
Is this the argument the defense is now trying to make?
Once you're punched in the nose, you are so stunned and rattled that you can never gain you're composure and have no choice but to shoot and kill the person who punched you.
This is just looney.
lame54
(35,332 posts)Having a gun drawn on you gives you the right to punch somebody in the nose
avebury
(10,952 posts)It could have just as easily been an elbow as Trayvon was trying to get away from Zimmerman.
We have only Zimmerman's story that the gun was in the holster. This is a man who looked Sean Hannity right in the eyes and lied through his teeth. Zimmerman is a man without credibility.
yardwork
(61,729 posts)He has no credibility. Lots of proven lies and a history of violence.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I don't buy a thing this "defense" is saying--they're trying every which way but loose to paint a bully as a saint, and a kid buying frigging candy and ice damn tea as a thug.
Not working with me--I just keep hearing "fucking punks" in my head....and it wasn't the dead kid saying that.
Democrats_win
(6,539 posts)If Zimmerman walks, we'll have to do that. Oh, and the rich radical GOP will once again claim to be the victims....Outrageous world America has become.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Cool huh?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)If Zimmerman would have stayed in the damn truck, none of this would have happened. But no, he went LOOKING for a fight.
Didnt get enough of playing cops & robbers as a child, apparently. But hey, he doesnt even regret any of it. Its was "Gods will" and all.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Its not like he ever got hit during his 6 hours a week of boxing, wrestling and juijitsu gym.
Besides, did you hear about Trayvon's ringtone?
madokie
(51,076 posts)and that is why they are so dangerous.
Those of us who are secure in our person don't feel a need for a gun.
Pulling a gun on me and not shooting me would be a big mistake for the gun holder. beentheredonethat
sinkingfeeling
(51,482 posts)msongs
(67,465 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)on a whim, forever depriving them of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness which is anathema and seemly unconstitutional on its face.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)and the victim is not white. Black shooter and white victim = Voluntary Manslaughter. Just ask Trevor Dooley.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)It just gives people a right to own an object.
Blue Bike
(65 posts)The head exists. No cherry-picking of body parts in order to make the injuries less significant.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)There was no way GZ could have defended himself other than to use a gun.
yardwork
(61,729 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)He was on a hunt and wanted to impress the police with his ability to protect the neighborhood and maybe get accepted into the police force. Look how great I am!
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)And just the product of message board cheerleaders who want to pretend Trayvon never hit him.
I think Zim is guilty if manslaughter, but lets face it: there was a fight In which Zimmerman was injured.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)Ding. Ding. Ding.
blm
(113,113 posts)so he could claim self-defense. There was none of Zimmerman's DNA on Martin's hands or body, now, were there?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)And the abrasions on the back of his head could have been caused the same way--the kick of the gun.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)How would that happen?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)But if Z was lying on the ground, shooting M at very close range, the gun would necessarily be pretty close to his own face. Maybe the recoil bloodied his nose; could it also cause his head to bang against the ground?
I dunno. I was just trying to picture it.
HeroInAHalfShell
(330 posts)IF you do then shoot who ever is hitting you!
Is the measure of fearful for life different or the same for everyone? is the the same for every individual?
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)almost each and every one of your posts are the same: someone was "fearful" for his life.
If that "someone" had left the boy alone and not followed him in the first place.............
................. If that "someone", being so feaking scared for his life, had not left the safety and confines of his vehicle............
That "someone" would'nt be on trial now.
or are you channeling that "someone"?
are you using fear as an excuse to just blow "someone" away at the first opportunity?
HeroInAHalfShell
(330 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,498 posts)Looks like you just threatened someone.
HeroInAHalfShell
(330 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)So all someone has to do is hit you, then you feel you have the right to murder them?
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)A real "hero".
yardwork
(61,729 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)threatened.
Coward. You and Zimmy both.
frylock
(34,825 posts)it's really that simple.
blm
(113,113 posts)Did he not think stalking a teenager would make the teenager fear for HIS life?
Finnmccool
(74 posts)would do, meaning your average Joe
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)In the vast majority of US jurisdictions and in most such situations, a person is permitted to use lethal force when they are physically attacked. There are some exceptions, such as when the "attacker" clearly represents no significant, substantive threat to the person attacked, but those situations are unusual.
The Zimmerman defense seems to be making this a key aspect of their argument, and apparently Florida law backs them up.
I have a huge problem with this, of course. Not with the basic idea that using deadly force in response to physical assault can be permitted, but with applying that principle to someone who initiated the confrontation and whose behavior made the other party fearful for their safety. Zimmerman's actions precipitated the entire encounter, and that places responsibility for the outcome on his shoulders, IMO.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)but the would-be victim has a right to use deadly force to resist.