Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe sale put her family in danger and could have ended her son’s life.
This is why background checks matter.
Reno mother questions gun sale to mentally ill son
On-duty Reno officer sold weapon without background check
Reno Police Sgt. Laura Conklin posted an ad for her gun on the website Armslist, and the man responded, according to his mother, Jill Schaller of Reno. Conklin told him she worked the night shift and said she could meet him at 4 a.m. at a Starbucks.
They met, she asked if he had committed any crimes, and he said no, according to Schaller. Conklin sold the man a Glock handgun for $950 cash and gave him a bill of sale, which was signed by both parties.
Conklin apparently did not know that the man has Aspergers syndrome, and that last year, he was committed to West Hills Hospital under what is called a legal 2000 meaning he was a threat to himself or others, Schaller said.
It is illegal under state and federal law for a person to possess a firearm if he or she was committed to any mental health facility. It also is illegal to sell a firearm to someone who has been institutionalized.
The sale illustrates what can happen when background checks are not required for private sales, Schaller said. The sale put her family in danger and could have ended her sons life, she said. She has filed a complaint with the Reno Police Internal Affairs office; she and her son will be interviewed by investigators today.
Read More: http://www.rgj.com/article/20130710/NEWS/307100018/Reno-mother-questions-gun-sale-mentally-ill-son
On-duty Reno officer sold weapon without background check
Reno Police Sgt. Laura Conklin posted an ad for her gun on the website Armslist, and the man responded, according to his mother, Jill Schaller of Reno. Conklin told him she worked the night shift and said she could meet him at 4 a.m. at a Starbucks.
They met, she asked if he had committed any crimes, and he said no, according to Schaller. Conklin sold the man a Glock handgun for $950 cash and gave him a bill of sale, which was signed by both parties.
Conklin apparently did not know that the man has Aspergers syndrome, and that last year, he was committed to West Hills Hospital under what is called a legal 2000 meaning he was a threat to himself or others, Schaller said.
It is illegal under state and federal law for a person to possess a firearm if he or she was committed to any mental health facility. It also is illegal to sell a firearm to someone who has been institutionalized.
The sale illustrates what can happen when background checks are not required for private sales, Schaller said. The sale put her family in danger and could have ended her sons life, she said. She has filed a complaint with the Reno Police Internal Affairs office; she and her son will be interviewed by investigators today.
Read More: http://www.rgj.com/article/20130710/NEWS/307100018/Reno-mother-questions-gun-sale-mentally-ill-son
Note: the sale was almost certainly not illegal, because state law requires the seller to know that the buyer was prohibited from having a gun. Without any requirement to check, it's a huge ... dare I say ... loophole in the law.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 816 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The sale put her family in danger and could have ended her son’s life. (Original Post)
Robb
Jul 2013
OP
niyad
(113,628 posts)1. so let me understand this. a police officer sold a gun to a person unknown to her, who SAID
he had not committed any crimes, which she did not know for a fact. the person could have been anybody, with any sort of record.