General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere is virtually no criticism of the President that doesn't
get characterized as bashing by most of his supporters. That's true not only here on DU. No matter if that criticism is phrased without any personal attacks on the President, it's still called bashing. No matter if the criticism is completely devoid of any inflammatory language; it's still bashing and it's met with angry accusations of Obama hater.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)and I'm afraid I can count the number of hard core Obama supporters who I think make good points sometimes, and that don't always throw out smears, attacks and nastiness, on one hand. Maybe two hands, depending on some that may not post much, on any given day.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)And yes, we have at least one such idiot here (post was hidden 4-2 btw).
cali
(114,904 posts)but that's one extreme example. However, I will grant you that there is a small cadre of people on the left that make such idiotic demands.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Just deflects the discussion away from the issue.
madamesilverspurs
(15,806 posts)the converse can be said about any positive remarks about the President.
cali
(114,904 posts)though not, I think, as consistently. There have been threads praising the President here with very little dissent.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)responses attacking him. Just sayin'.
cali
(114,904 posts)and no, I won't put you on ignore.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I avoid those threads, for the most part.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)you should learn to expect it LOL
Heres 4 minutes and 22 seconds of greatness that is something different for ya!
branch out a little!
SunSeeker
(51,649 posts)mick063
(2,424 posts)But I will never forgive chained CPI.
A former member of OFA, chained CPI fundamentally changed my perspective.
I now have no good argument for the folks I talk to daily.
All I can do is sheepishly say, "Yea, you were right about him."
whathehell
(29,082 posts)and I know people who still think he's bluffing.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Way back in 2009.
I knew then that he was not the President I had fought so hard to get elected.
By the time chained CPI came around I was way past arguing for him.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)I knew then that we were in for a corporatist ride that had the same attitude (though more cloaked) that Rahm Emanuel did towards progressives or the "professional left".
lark
(23,147 posts)I think these cabinet appointments say it all and said it very early. These were my tipping points, the loss of single payor & agreeing beforehand that the government wouldn't negotiate drug prices for Medicare just sealed the deal.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)but I am a teacher, and I knew there would be no meeting of minds from the beginning. I think that when the issues are further removed, it's easier to discount dissent, but when it gets up close and personal, it becomes more and more difficult. SS is up close and personal for all of us.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)The "Father Knows Best" wing of our party insists that the emperor is wearing his robes even when his ass is hanging out.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)leftstreet
(36,111 posts)He failed to generate investment
6 years later and no jobs program, no infrastructure planning, nothing zip nada, either public or private
Ugh but he'll get his golden parachute regardless
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Those who are still hanging on with all their might remind me of "The GTO's" or the "Apple scruffs" from the 60's.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)We all know that Obama did not start the surveillance any more than he started some of the excesses and wastefulness of Homeland Security.
He is the executive. He doesn't make all the decisions by himself. The folks in the bureaucracy of the NSA are held over from administration to administration. Same for the military.
The president, whoever he is, just passes through.
So the criticism of the NSA doesn't have much to do with the Obama except for the fact that he appointed the current head.
But even there, it isn't like his choice for Sec. of the Treasury or Sec. of Defense because the reality, the political reality is that his choices are narrowed due to the difficulty of leading the intelligence and military parts of the government.
Remember. Our Constitution and our Founding Fathers did not envision a standing army much less a standing intelligence service with the power ours has.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Peacetrain
(22,878 posts)If people disagree with you.. they are going to push back.. just like I saw you do in this very thread..I get pushback all the time from people who either do not agree with me.. or in most cases.. have not read the op or post I put up completely.. People get a sense of where you are in the world of politics.. and anything you post in DU has to go through that filter first.. that is you , me , even old skinner, everyone but a newbie..we are all judged by previous conversations...if you really want to make a point hang in there.. and make your point.. keep talking with the person to find out where they are coming from.. it may not be all that different from where you are.. its the way people say things.. and preconceptions..
Phlem
(6,323 posts)it's sorely needed to be said.
Your post will unfortunately be considered bashing by the fan club and the circle keeps going round and round.
Me thinks some people can't handle being wrong and will double down on teh stoopid rather than admit it. You know like the republican constituency.
-p
BrainMann1
(460 posts)No one seems to do their homework. They bash the President , then cry wolf when he's proven right. His true supporters as myself see that he's doing his best anything would be better that having Romney as our president.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)that was ongoing months before the election -- the dynamics. tactics, etc, as well as the participants pro and con are largely the same.
What I find most amusing is the way they then and now ignore the glaringly obvious false dichotomy (logical fallacy) that underlies the lion's share of such garbage. It's not the two extremes of "BHO haters" and "BHO worshippers" battling this out, but rather a large spectrum of people, many of which who would largely likely still vote for BHO knowing what they know NOW because of the alternative.
If anyone has a character flaw, I'd say it's those that resemble the Bush supporters that use to wail/whine about the "Bush hate" in the face of legitimate criticisms they couldn't muster an adequate explanation for or defense of.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)I voted for him twice. I still have a Veterans for Obama sticker on my car. I owe him a great deal. Supporting him has been enlightening. He has irrevocably destroyed my child like faith in the two party political system and in so doing made it undeniably clear who he and I, sadly, both work for. No Republican could have ever done me a greater service. Thank you Mr. President!
thetonka
(265 posts)In politics and in some ways daily life there is no dissension or praise allowed, unless it is dissension against the other guys and praise for their guy.
The two party system has ruined our ability to discuss and compromise. If you are a democrat you are not allowed to say anything bad against the leaders of the Democrats and you are not allowed to say anything good about any Republican. There will be no progress and no lasting prosperity in our country until we as a people push back against the two party system idea that you have to choose and once you choose you have to blindly accept and follow. The two parties only want sheep, they only want blind allegiance and in the end they want these things only to further their power.
Think for yourself, speak your mind, be honest with yourself and others. Don't be afraid to criticize or dissent when you do not agree, and don't be afraid to praise when it's deserved.
indepat
(20,899 posts)democratic, or progressive principle, be it of omission or commission. To espouse or continue any right-wing principle/agenda/action/et al would be an act of commission imo.
Skittles
(153,174 posts)they are making fools of themselves; Obama himself would be disgusted by these folk
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I like Obama much more than those here who wear the 'Super Supporter' mantel. Much more.