General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSomething to bring us all together: EPIC Jim DeMint whine on marriage eqality ruling
Don't forget, DeMented is now President of the estimable Heritage Foundation. So here it is, a whine from their President.
DeMint: Do Traditional Marriage Supporters Deserve to Be Treated with Dignity?
Some people cant seem to understand why anyone would support marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Indeed, Justice Anthony Kennedy argued last week that the only reason Congress had for passing the Defense of Marriage Act was to disparage, injure, degrade, demean, and humiliate others. Justice Kennedy says were denying dignity to people in same-sex relationships.
But it is his ruling that denies dignity to those who dont think a same-sex relationship is a marriage. His ruling denies dignity to the millions of Americans and their elected officials who have voted to pass laws that tell the truth about marriage.
The rhetoric from the Court attacking the goodwill of the majority of Americanswho know marriage is the union of a man and a womanis not helpful. The marriage debate will continue, and all Americans need to be civil and respectful.
Already, however, we have seen that those in favor of redefining marriage are willing to use the coercive force of law to marginalize and penalize those who hold the historic view of marriageeven if it means trampling First Amendment religious liberty protections along the way. This is already evident in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, D.C., where Christian adoption agencies have been forced to stop providing adoption and foster care services.
<snip>
Our interest in marriage policy from the beginning has been to ensure that a man and woman commit to each other as husband and wife to be father and mother to any children they create. This gives children the best chance at a flourishing future. When children have that, liberals are less likely to succeed in their efforts to grow the welfare state. It is impossible for the government to redefine marriage to make fathers optional and for society to insist at the same time that fathers are essential.
<snip>
http://blog.heritage.org/2013/07/02/morning-bell-do-traditional-marriage-supporters-deserve-to-be-treated-with-dignity/
and it just gets whinier, er, I mean better. Love the ridiculous lie that the majority of Americans know that marriage is only between a man and a woman.
What a tool.
Arkansas Granny
(31,528 posts)" even if it means trampling First Amendment religious liberty protections along the way."
Whenever they can't force their beliefs on others, they claim that their rights are being "trampled". They love being persecuted.
LuvNewcastle
(16,856 posts)No Jim, the marriage debate is effectively over. You lost.