Why Republicans Want to Tax Students and Not Polluters
A basic economic principle is government ought to tax what we want to discourage, and not tax what we want to encourage.
For example, if we want less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we should tax carbon polluters. On the other hand, if we want more students from lower-income families to be able to afford college, we shouldnt put a tax on student loans.
Sounds pretty simple, doesnt it? Unfortunately, congressional Republicans are intent on doing exactly the opposite.
Earlier this year the Republican-led House passed a bill pegging student-loan interest rates to the yield on the 10-year Treasury note, plus 2.5 percentage points. I have very little tolerance for people who tell me that they graduate with $200,000 of debt or even $80,000 of debt because theres no reason for that, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), the co-sponsor of the GOP bill, said.
. . .
In other words, its a tax and one that hits lower-income students and their families. Which is why several leading Democrats, including Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, oppose it. Lets make sure we dont charge so much in interest that the students are actually paying a tax to reduce the deficit, he argues.
THE REST (as per usual - follow the money and we find the answer):
http://robertreich.org/#.Udhe46ocAtU.twitter