General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt was the US AMBASSADOR to Austria who called the FM to say Snowden was on Pres Morales' plane
Last edited Thu Jul 4, 2013, 09:26 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm posting this on request and also because too many people are pretending not to understand why Latin American leaders are pointing their fingers at the US. I'm sure more information will come out later which explains the State Department's tap-dancing about this. I can't wait to see today's briefing.
Related thread: White House Dares EU Leaders to Rat On United States in Morales Flyover Affair
03.07.2013 | 21:28 | HELMAR DUMBS UND CHRISTIAN ULTSCH (Die Presse)
Bolivian President Morales was forced to land in Vienna. NSA whistleblower Snowden was suspected to be on his jet. In a telephone conversation with the Foreign Office, the U.S. ambassador demanded they extradite him.
...
Here's the crucial section:
Sie landete gegen 23 Uhr. Kurz danach ging im Wiener Außenamt ein dringlicher Anruf ein. Am anderen Ende der Leitung: US-Botschafter William Eacho. Wie "Die Presse" erfuhr, behauptete er mit großer Bestimmtheit, dass Edward Snowden an Bord sei, der von den USA gesuchte Aufdecker jüngster Abhörskandale. Eacho habe auf eine diplomatische Note verwiesen, in der die USA die Auslieferung Snowdens verlangten.
Translated:
It landed about 11 pm. Shortly after that, the Vienna foreign department received a phone call. The caller was the US ambassador William Echo. "Die Presse" learned that he claimed with strong firmness that Edward Snowden was onboard, the whistleblower of the recent surveillance scandals. Eacho referred to a diplomatic note requesting Snowden's extradition.
http://diepresse.com/home/politik/aussenpolitik/1426275/USA-verlangten-von-Wien-Snowdens-Auslieferung?_vl_backlink=/home/politik/aussenpolitik/1416110/index.do&direct=1416110
Thanks to Temmer for the translation
Update:
Meanwhile in Vienna, Defence Minister Saavedra pointed an accusatory finger at Washington. We want to declare very firmly that it was an American story that Edward Snowden was on this flight, he said from the airport lounge.
http://www.france24.com/en/20130703-bolivia-president-evo-morales-airplane-rerouted-vienna-snowden
Rex
(65,616 posts)Just wait...they will be here in this thread telling you that everything is okay, because they ALL do it!
The goal post movers are having a Herculean day today.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)and day after day after day too.
Hi Rex
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)The other countries did not want to touch this with a ten foot pole?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)President? What happened, did we end all those nasty Bush policies?
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)and they tried for hours, mostly Spain which for hours insisted it would only give him refuelling/overfly rights IF he agreed to an inspection. Did you catch my thread mentioning how the Spanish Ambassador tried to climb on board for a cup of coffee. What insulting arrogance, like an FBI agent trying to climb into your car at an intersection with a thermos of coffee in his hand because he can't get a warrant to search your car for pot.
"I could not allow (do) that. We have our dignity" I said. "I am not a criminal for (you to) take over the plane". ("Yo no soy ningún delincuente para que controle el avión".)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023168391
Thanks to Temmer for that translation
A little earlier, the Head of State, Heinz Fischer, who had come to the airport to meet his Bolivian counterpart, affirmed that "conditions have been fulfilled to continue the trip". "Passports have been verified and, contrary to rumors, Edward Snowden is not on board", declared the spokesperson for the Interior Ministry,Karl-Heinz Grundboeck. The plane was not searched. "There was no legal reason for a search", he said.
http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2013/07/03/une-rumeur-sur-snowden-provoque-une-crise-diplomatique-entre-paris-et-la-paz_3440849_3222.html
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)(as I, and many others long suspected).
Catherina
(35,568 posts)But I pointed that out because this is where his talk of harassment comes in
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)This is one story where only knowing English is a definite impediment to finding out anything about what happened.
When you google various expressions related to the plight of Morales, you find out his plane was forced down (one version); his plane was denied the requested privilege to land, (another version), and various other scenarios. Since unless you can go off to a foreign nation's newspapers and read there, you have no idea of which version of what to consider, and within short order your head is spinning.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The ugly America exposed.
mazzarro
(3,450 posts)mitchtv
(17,718 posts)still haven't given up their colonial attitude. To me this attempt by the Spanish to search the head of another state's plane was clearlly a provocation and hopefully their agent(so called Ambassador) in La Paz is packing his bags as we speak
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)thanks for all your work on this, Catherina.
Thanks for keeping an eye on all the other issues so I can focus on this.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)malaise
(269,024 posts)I thought it was a refueling stop
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)So they were keeping a careful eye on this. Quite planned and orchestrated.
think
(11,641 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)What might have transpired if Snowden WAS onboard?
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)xiamiam
(4,906 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)here's "another Prosense thread?"
What Kind Of Coward Is Edward Snowden?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023169023
Clearly, I'm on your mind.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)I followed the link but the blue glare blinded me.
jazzimov
(1,456 posts)you might want to try it sometime, instead of just pulling stuff out of...... thin air.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Or would it be East Coast Pirate III?
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)And I'm constantly accused of representing pirates!
Response to jberryhill (Reply #81)
Post removed
Response to East Coast Pirate (Reply #23)
Puglover This message was self-deleted by its author.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)off. But the real insult is the arrogance and stupidity of whoever thought that Morales would be stupid enough to have done such a thing. THEY know better than to give the Western Colonial Powers ANY excuse to accuse them sneaking a fugitive into their countries. They are law abiding nations, unlike this one.
He is a President not a common thug, educated in the law, extremely intelligent, apparently fare more intelligent than those running this country's foreign policies.
Remember when the Brits, equally arrogant Colonialists, threatened to invade Ecuador's Embassy to get Assange until more intelligent minds dragged them back from making such a foolish mistake.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)from happening. But that is their view of Latin American countries, they do not respect their sovereignty. Fortunately over the past ten years, Latin America has strengthened its defenses against the old Colonialists and their Corporate bosses. Right now they are meeting to decide what to do about this assault on the sovereignty of one of their members.
Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)It seemed they were damned close to doing it, too, before they got over that ugly, unacceptable impulse.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I'm begininng to wonder if the US had received a bad tip-off from unsympathetic parties.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)xiamiam
(4,906 posts)like the keystone kops... with the evil villain of untruthiness or the least truthiness as their leader. You just cant make this stuff up. I don't approve at all but even if I did, I'd be a little embarrassed at the ineptitude fueled by arrogance
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)no US involvement whatsoever. nope.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)owned largely by the Catholic Church, the ambassador made that call after the plane had landed.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Any other news outlets reporting this besides the one in the OP? I did a search of google news and found NOTHING.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Just makes me cautious.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Or someone has something to gain from feeding falsification to the paper. In any case, we can pick and choose which papers to believe, of course. We now have both Morales statements and an Austrian source.
No-one is actually contradicting either of them as far as I can see... at least, no-one directly or closely involved, nor any of the papers such agencies might release statements to.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I haven't seen this reported anywhere else. This would be a very big deal.
Also, there are no direct quotes from American or Austrian officials regarding this "call".
I smell bullshit.
Oh ya.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Like this one: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023159070
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)It says specifically that "French officials denied Wednesday that France refused to let the plane cross over its airspace"
A quick search of google news and you can see this reported by various news sources:
http://www.google.com/#q=%22france+denies%22&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=8uzVUdjuC8zU0gGjq4C4Cw&ved=0CAoQ_AUoBA&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.48705608,d.dmQ&fp=404b96c0abfbc4df&biw=1280&bih=709
Then there is also a report of the French apologizing. Actually this contradiction was already discussed in this DU post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023167065
Also....this article discusses the fact that every country involved said their airspace was not denied:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/07/tale-re-routed-bolivian-presidents-plane-falling-apart/66838/
Cheers!
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)admission and apology, somehow that didn't make it into your post.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)again...it's a contradictory position of the French government.
If you want to blame me for that, go right ahead.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)for the denial.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-23174874
Ministry spokesman Philippe Lalliot said: "The foreign minister called his Bolivian counterpart to tell him
about France's regrets after the incident caused by the late confirmation of permission for President Morales'
plane to fly over territory."
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)What do you have to disprove their own information?
Would a corporate paper from an outside source do better?
Is this something you'd find in a U.S. corporate source? Ever?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)The only people who would have called or received a call are government officials.
Just one more source reporting this.
Judi, I really don't think that is too much to ask.
Of course I will be attacked for asking for additional sources, but I really don't mind.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)but ignoring official statements you don't.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)specifically said the plane had authorization to fly over France. This isn't just reported by one outlet, it's reported by many.
However, with regard to the OP, only one outlet is reporting this.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Ministry spokesman Philippe Lalliot said: "The foreign minister called his Bolivian counterpart to tell him
about France's regrets after the incident caused by the late confirmation of permission for President Morales'
plane to fly over territory."
WovenGems
(776 posts)"Late confirmation" means the plane had already diverted. Thus the permission was meaningless. Unless of course, one is looking for an excuse.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)"MY single source is air-tight. YOURS is clearly bullshit."
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)(Via Salzburger Nachrichten, a normal Austrian newspaper)
Intervention von US-Botschafter?
Wie die Tageszeitung "Die Presse" in ihrer Donnerstagsausgabe berichtet, hat es noch am Montagabend eine Intervention von US-Botschafter William Eacho gegeben. Laut "Presse" behauptete der Diplomat mit großer Bestimmtheit, dass Edward Snowden an Bord sei, der von den USA gesuchte Aufdecker jüngster Abhörskandale. Eacho habe auf eine diplomatische Note verwiesen, in der die USA die sofortige Auslieferung Snowdens verlangten. Im Außenamt wurde am Mittwochabend auf Anfrage der APA bestätigt, dass es einen Anruf Eachos gegeben habe. Druck sei dabei aber keiner ausgeübt worden.
Bolded part translated by DiK:
On wednesday evening, the Foreign Ministry confirmed an inquiry by APA (DiK: Austria Presse Agentur) that there was a call by (William) Eachos. There was no pressuring (of the Austrian Ministry).
The truth, as always, grayish and plausibly deniable...
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #25)
Recursion This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Recursion (Reply #55)
Democracyinkind This message was self-deleted by its author.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)Chaco Dundee
(334 posts)What would one expect when a troglodite takes action directed by troglodites?
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)magellan
(13,257 posts)And that would be a great way for Obama to clean his hands of this mess.
I suspect, however, that Eacho will be embraced like Clapper.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)magellan
(13,257 posts)I have no doubt Eacho's decision to get on the phone wasn't off the cuff. Someone had to tell him that Morales's plane had been forced to land in Vienna, and it had to come from on high. It's hard to see how such an event would be of any interest to the US Ambassador to Austria if the name "Snowden" hadn't entered the picture.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)come from The State Department?
magellan
(13,257 posts)It's unlikely that Eacho would make such a phone call without instruction. Which is what I was getting at in my initial comment: if he did take this on himself, then Obama has good reason to recall him.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)might ease the international tension. I cannot recall anything like this happening before in my lifetime. Obama has also got to get rid of whoever gave him such bad advice. Our country might not be able to afford another diplomatic faux pas like this again.
magellan
(13,257 posts)And by "they" I mean our government at large -- Dem, Rethug...whatever. We are behaving like a corrupt empire and there's no sign that it will get anything but worse. I don't see many railing against it, anyway. Bernie Sanders, Alan Grayson...we need many more like them to effect any significant change from this dark path we're on.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)People are not stupid. This shitstorm goes right back to the oval office.
magellan
(13,257 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Good catch, Catherina. Thank you.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)Only DUers, who thankfully have members who can translate, are getting the info and seeing the power of the US Government up close.
Awesome job Catherina and all our contributors!!!
Response to Catherina (Original post)
Catherina This message was self-deleted by its author.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)And now we know it's the case.
Thanks for keeping on top of this, Catherina!
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Were you or anyone else surprised to see how long they let this "hang out" there?
Do they think that Democrats only watch CNN/MSNBC/Reality Shows and Crap?
Why won't they clarify who gave the order to have that plane be held in Austria (searched) and then to have the South American Union Countries have to go out and complain about it..and with so much disinfo and confusion in USA Media to have this FESTER on Social Media and elswhere?
What were they thinking. If Kerry OKAYED IT...then let him get out there and speak about it. What's the DELAY?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Just keep that in mind.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Kind of odd they're even printing such hot material. Someone has got to take the to task, one would suppose.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)By President Morales.
sgtbenobo
(327 posts).... of what our embassies have been chattering about post-Snowden. I think we have a bunch of cowboys running amok here whether it's Wikileaks or Prism they just don't seem to know if they should shit or go blind. Where's Bradley when we need him? Oh right, he's in solitary. Thanks again Adrian Lamo.
Carry on.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I knew it.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Where did the US ambassador get the information?
Also how would Snowden have gotten on Morales' plane when they were at two different airports?
Logically that one doesn't make sense.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Yes, and how would have Snowden gotten on his plane, especially now that he is without papers, he would have been arrested by Russian police the minute he stepped on to Russia soil illegally, a thing he would have had to do to get on Morales's airplane.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)carolinayellowdog
(3,247 posts)sometimes a single moment illuminates why a person has a particular name-- God is a comic novelist
caseymoz
(5,763 posts). . . it's now confirmed that the US was behind this crap.
I remember just last Friday President Obama stating how Snowden was so yesterday, that he had too many important things to attend to be concerned about an issue plain-old law enforcement could take care of. Yes, law enforcement, like the US State Department, at the ambassador level.
As good as our government was at kicking itself in the nuts, I really wonder who planted the disinformation that Snowden was on the Bolivian president's jet? We will probably never find out, but I know Putin is probably laughing hardest.
It's probably one the the best practical jokes in the history of international intrigue. I don't think it's going to be the last one on us before this is over. The rest of the world is going to have a knee-slapping time making the great empire look like a bunch of buffoons over this.
And the US now deserves no less.
temmer
(358 posts)http://www.heute.at/news/welt/art23661,898346
claims it is the biggest blamage for US foreign policy ever.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)So....
What would have happened if Snowden WAS on board? Is the plane itself regarded the same as an embassy? And if they dragged him off under protest by Morales? This still would have been a low move.
Either way Bolivia and other South American populations will not forget this clumsy arrogant insult any time soon.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I expected such humiliating behavior from Bush. Not from the guy I voted for
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Kurovski
(34,655 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)A few tweets here and there, to include Anonymous, FDL and Global Research, resulted in a few articles and now RT Spanish has picked up this story.
http://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/view/99475-embajador-eeuu-austria-avion-morales
Publicado: 8 jul 2013 | 13:38 GMT Última actualización: 8 jul 2013 | 13:38 GMT
El embajador de EE.UU. en Austria, William Eacho, fue quien emitió una denuncia falsa de que el ex técnico de la CIA, Edward Snowden, estaba a bordo del avión del presidente boliviano, según el periódico austriaco 'Die Presse'.
Todo sobre este tema
En su edición fechada el 3 de julio el periódico afirmó que el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Austria recibió una llamada telefónica de Eacho.
Según 'Die Presse' el diplomático afirmó gran certidumbre de que Edward Snowden estaba a bordo del avión boliviano e hizo mención a una nota diplomática solicitando la extradición de Edward Snowden.
El presidente Barack Obama había designado a Eacho como embajador de Estados Unidos en Austria en Junio del 2009, pese a que carecía por completo de experiencia diplomática.
Eacho era el consejero delegado de la gran empresa de desarrollos inmobiliarios Carlton Capital Group.
...
Texto completo en: http://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/view/99475-embajador-eeuu-austria-avion-morales