General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUm Evo, does Bolivia spy on its citizens?
http://legacy.utsandiego.com/news/world/20080124-1513-bolivia-policespying.htmlBy Dan Keane
ASSOCIATED PRESS
3:13 p.m. January 24, 2008
LA PAZ, Bolivia Bolivia's national police commander said Thursday that his own department's intelligence service had spied on politicians and journalists without his knowledge and angrily accused a subordinate of directing the dirty work.
The announcement by Gen. Miguel Vasquez was prompted by materials sent anonymously to several Bolivian news media this week, which appeared to document efforts to follow opposition state governors, a television reporter, and two congressmen aligned with President Evo Morales.
.
.
.
Antonio Peredo, a senator from Morales' Movement Toward Socialism party, downplayed the revelations.
We all know there exists state security system, and that system has to keep up on the movements of political parties, unions, Peredo said. Everybody's done it.
---------------------------------------------------------
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)The Bolivian government, like all governments, deserves scrutiny. But I believe this is just a lame-ass attempt to smear Morales in some deluded effort to minimize what happened on his way back from Moscow.
It's pitiful and pathetic. And low.
And misguided. You're trying to accuse Morales of hypocrisy, I suppose, but what's at issue is not whether Bolivia does intelligence gathering but the propriety of treating a sovereign head of state like a criminal suspect.
You ought to stay out of the muck. You have plenty of peers who are quite willing to go there; no need to dirty yourself any further. Leave it to them.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)They spied on rival candidates and parties! And their answer specifically related to the spying on rival candidates and parties is:
"It's no big deal, everybody does it"
So, how is that a distraction if at this point, Morales is claiming he is superior to us morally?
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)*sigh*
cali
(114,904 posts)I'm concerned about NSA mass surveillance because I live in the U.S. duh.
And could you please link to Morales' quote where he claims he's superior to us morally?
I know he's claimed that the U.S. doesn't have the moral authority to lecture others, but that's hardly the same thing.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Steve is all pro.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)Hey, since we're in the muck...
cali
(114,904 posts)did he say that they didn't? how is this related to the issues around his plane?
what, in short, is the point that you are presumably trying to make?
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Crickets from the OP!
cali
(114,904 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)from denying the plane was grounded, to Evo deserved it?
byeya
(2,842 posts)the real news that will have an impact one way or another.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)reveal facts about the Bolivian government and their espionage operations.
cali
(114,904 posts)really, why should anyone care?
treestar
(82,383 posts)I ask this generally as I don't know whether you're on that subject or not.
It's been such an outrage on DU generally today that Evo's private jet had to land in Austria because supposedly the US ordered the French, etc. not to let him stop in their countries. Due to a fear of Snowden being on board.
cali
(114,904 posts)I would be exceedingly displeased if this happened to Air Force One.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)are they unhappy with Morales or his party? No. They are unhappy with... me!!
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)personality!
cali
(114,904 posts)I almost feel sorry for you.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)you couldn't possibly look more desperate.
Progressive dog
(6,904 posts)One of the amen chorus just checking in.
cali
(114,904 posts)I'm not a Bolivian citizen.
you really do post nonsense.
treestar
(82,383 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Help me out here.
1. Any government that dares to challenge the American Empire, deserves at least to go under the bus.
2. What good is it to have an authoritarian state if some no-account foreign leader wont knuckle under.
3. Morales better remember what we did to Hussein.
4. (anyone else want to guess the point of the OP?)
Cleita
(75,480 posts)We have an amendment against our country spying on it's citizens and our government is in violation of it. That's the difference. I don't know if Bolivia or Venezuela have that written into their Constitutions. It might be perfectly legal for them.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Or, any other candidate who thinks it's a good idea for the NSA to spy on American citizens without probable cause approved by a secret court holding secret proceedings.
cali
(114,904 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)He tends to behave just like them imo.
cali
(114,904 posts)limp as overcooked spaghetti.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Here, I was wondering if I was the only one.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)while supporting NSA spying.
kentuck
(111,097 posts)Not them...
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)domestic spying here is a much bigger deal than domestic spying in another country?
Btw, it's lame that you can't answer a single question that's asked of you.
dkf
(37,305 posts)All over the world this is what people who feel they can do as they please are getting away with.
All leaders have become corrupted and now they have the tools to do so much.
This is not the world I want to live in. It needs to be changed.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)is -- what, exactly?
i'd guess we all know that all governments spy on their own citizens. and i'd guess we all know that 'everyone does it' is not a defense to a criminal act.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)what are they gonna do, shove a RadioShack tape recorder in a dufflebag under my bed?
that's sooooo not the poin, and a 10th grade logical fallacy.
and you are on TV? holy smokes.
Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)have to come up with some relevant facts in this discussion!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You need to, as well, and something besides clever icons. Gods, you have such potential, my friend. I'm starting to feel sorry for you at this point, and I mean that sincerely.
frylock
(34,825 posts)this discussion? for fucking real?!!
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Perhaps over-stepping a bit?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)And frankly Steven, I think that is beneath you.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)And I'm disappointed in you. I really am.
Another brilliant liberal voice co-opted to parrot propaganda. Just sickening to watch .
Aerows
(39,961 posts)And Marrah_G is right. It is beneath you.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)of state over A LIE?
not to mention the secret murders.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Go back to your Faux News punditry.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)I don't find uninformed xenophobia funny. Apparently anyone with access to Google and Wikipedia is an "expert" these days. Didn't you tell someone they couldn't interpret the 4th Amendment unless they with a constitutional lawyer? When did you get your degree in Latin American studies? Get over yourself.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)and the bleating from the perpetually outraged is kinda fun to watch.
Sid
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)If it is to draw attention to the fact that most governments spy on their citizens, okay, that is a worthwhile point.
If it is to claim that Evo Morales' government ALSO spies on its citizens, just like the US and several European countries, and that therefore, Morales has no right to claim standard diplomatic immunity when he flies over foreign lands, then no, that is not a worthwhile point.
cali
(114,904 posts)I think that the op is somehow saying that because Bolivia conducts surveillance on its citizens, we shouldn't be concerned by mass surveillance here in the U.S.
...it is a deflection of some sort, that much is clear.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)diversion #12 . That will definitely get you somewhere. You are just batting 1000 on the PR scale today, aren't you? Some people just get notice because they try too hard.
Man. You deserve a bonus for this work!
Rex
(65,616 posts)as of right now I think he is going for a third helping of crow.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)because there is good in all of us, I think.
Certain arguments and ways of manipulating an argument? I take great joy in watching them destruct like the bombs that land in a toilet that they are, to ever be flushed from history.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)to catch a Bolivian dissident it thought he was hiding aboard, that would be cool?
Riiight.
Nothing to see here, folks.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Have you finally noticed the metrics of your argument, Skippy?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Also Known as: Peer Pressure.
Description of Bandwagon
The Bandwagon is a fallacy in which a threat of rejection by one's peers (or peer pressure) is substituted for evidence in an "argument." This line of "reasoning" has the following form:
Person P is pressured by his/her peers or threatened with rejection.
Therefore person P's claim X is false.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)but please continue!!!!
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)The key word here is FUNDAMENTAL.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)The greater point is that I am not a cult of personality type. I will happily disagree with and call out the administration when I think they have actually done something wrong.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...I have little to add.
progressoid
(49,990 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)..I guess this means electing Socialists isn't the answer.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)You choose strange bedfellows. Just sayin.