General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew BREAKING scandal: French spy agency caught spying on phone calls, emails, web use
PARIS (Reuters) - France's external intelligence agency spies on the French public's phone calls, emails and social media activity in France and abroad, the daily Le Monde said on Thursday.
It said the DGSE intercepted signals from computers and telephones in France, and between France and other countries, although not the content of phone calls, to create a map of "who is talking to whom". It said the activity was illegal.
"All of our communications are spied on," wrote Le Monde, which based its report on unnamed intelligence sources as well as remarks made publicly by intelligence officials.
"Emails, text messages, telephone records, access to Facebook and Twitter are then stored for years," it said.
Read more: http://in.news.yahoo.com/french-agency-spies-phone-calls-email-paper-says-154203093.html
Article is interesting. The agency says they did it in accordance with the law. Le Monde says it was illegal.
Anyone here familiar with French law?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)BenzoDia
(1,010 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)I thought the Big Brother concept was US centric...ALL countries that are capable are using this technology..up next for disclosure I'm taking bets on Germany...hell they are prob sharing Databases
BenzoDia
(1,010 posts)However, people act like it's tightly regulated but ignore the fact that they've been busts snooping on journalists twice in the last decade.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)No doubt Germany does the EXACT same thing.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)That's your Mulligan for today.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)That's why we have elections and 3 branches of govt.
But some information is deemed classified and there's debate about whether or not it should be.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)holds elections on a regularly-scheduled basis. Checks and balances.
GOTV 2014!
sigmasix
(794 posts)it's all Obama's fault! after all haven't many DU posters made it clear that the President is an evil traitor and secretly spys on every american all the time?
The crowd that calls those that disagree with them "sheeple" are the only ones we can trust! they have all the truth about the matrix and the two little pills. Anyone that isnt setting their hair on fire and crying over the stupidity of all those "sheeple" that disagree with them shouldn't be trusted.
Isn't this the meme being repeated by DU members and right wing media?
You're nearly a laugh, but you're really a cry.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Skittles
(153,164 posts)Igel
(35,317 posts)In a democracy, the government is "we the people."
That means we the people are spying on we the people.
Should we the people supervise we the people as we spy on we the people? Perhaps we the people can summarize their findings from spying on we the people for the benefit of we the people.
Or have reps do the work for us. Obama's one of we the people. So's Snowden. Heck, so's Rove and *.
That's no good. Nope, gotta be all or nothing.
By what means?
Skittles
(153,164 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)surveillance.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)you think everything is just A-OK
treestar
(82,383 posts)will oversee the surveillance. It's a nice slogan to say we the people should over see it, but if not backed up with a real proposal for how to do it, it is as empty as the rest of the slogans. If I think all is fine, and you think all is not fine, then you are the one who should tell us how another alternative is better and will work.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)instead of "STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE", supporting the ACLU, and...... but you know what - discussing this with you is like talking to a chair - POINTLESS -
treestar
(82,383 posts)we the people are overseeing surveillance?
You're the chair as you have no answer to that and keep deflecting.
Number23
(24,544 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Amonester
(11,541 posts)("Told u so!"
Who's next?
("ALL" ?
Bonjour, Agent Michel !
Va te faire f...
matt819
(10,749 posts)So if America jumped off a bridge, would France jump off a bridge too?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I didn't excuse the spying referenced in the article. I don't know much about French law and I was wondering if someone here did.
Thanks for your contribution.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
BumRushDaShow
(129,057 posts)over the millennia, has been open to or has been actually intercepted. Whether it be a human/animal messenger who travels between clans/kingdoms/empires, or an email that zaps along a wire/satellite. This is why messages were often encrypted, going back to ancient times. Even indigenous peoples who remain isolated from modern societies, often send out "scouts" to determine whether any threats exist, and they will bring back info on what they find.
Is it right when it is done to us? No. But it is not something that just started this past week nor is it going away anytime soon... otherwise it would have been abolished tens of thousands of years ago. Anyone familiar with what is dubbed "Pig Latin" and one of the purposes of it, would make the connection of how societies find ways of getting around this "spying" phenomena.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Zut alors!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)UTUSN
(70,700 posts)dickthegrouch
(3,174 posts)Doesn't French law presume guilt until proven innocent? How could collection of data to support that presumption possibly be illegal?
Added on edit:
US law on the other hand:
A) Has a protection against unreasonable search and seizure
B) Presumes innocence until proven guilty
I can't wait for someone to try to use the treasure trove of NSA data to prove their innocence, or for some overreaching prosecutor to try to use some of it to prove guilt, and to have the whole trove tossed because it was collected without warrant (see (A) above).
I have no problem with them collecting data AFTER a specific warrant has been issued, as used to happen before all of our rights were pissed away (by both sides).
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)EarlG's Pic of the moment says it best:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017129410
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)Hopefully, this will inspire the French people to root the neoliberal authoritarians out of their government.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Germany? Everybody just might as well come out with it all at once.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)BenzoDia
(1,010 posts)Heywood J
(2,515 posts)"Give me your papers, your emails,
Your phone calls yearning to be recorded,
Your wretched metadata to my teeming datacenter.
Send these, the emails, intercepted to me,
I install my surveillance camera beside the golden door!"