Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

(8,399 posts)
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 04:19 AM Jul 2013

So, along with character assassination and guilt by association, we can now add . . .

. . . seizing upon an alleged inaccuracy in a secondary detail of a story -- a detail not ultimately germane to the story itself -- in an effort to discredit the main thrust of a story.

I am speaking, of course, of the discussion of whether France or Italy or Portugal did or did not deny Morales' plane permission to fly through their airspace, or whether or not the plane w as refused permission to land in those countries for refueling. Ultimately, it doesn't matter. The significant part of the story is what happened on the ground in Vienna -- which is not in dispute -- when a sovereign head of state's plane was denied permission to depart for something like 10 hours, until that head of state finally agreed to permit his plane to be searched (a search to which he did not voluntarily consent and which the Austrian government had no legal right to demand).

Nice try, though.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, along with character assassination and guilt by association, we can now add . . . (Original Post) markpkessinger Jul 2013 OP
I agree with your point. mick063 Jul 2013 #1
If the plane was not formally denied overflight/landing... TheMadMonk Jul 2013 #2
Yes, those questions are interesting in and of themselves . . . markpkessinger Jul 2013 #3
Tactics like that are just another form of duplicity or lying. Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #4
 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
1. I agree with your point.
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 04:51 AM
Jul 2013

I'll give it a +1, but it diverts from the real issue at hand.

Not directed at you, but I'll put it in terms that the American Idol crowd can understand.

I'm concerned about the huge fiery eye catching a glimpse of Frodo.

I hear it is in Utah.

Where is the public outcry to tear it down?

Honestly, that is where the discussion must ultimately go. We must get specific about what we want or they will dance around it and let it stand.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
2. If the plane was not formally denied overflight/landing...
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 05:01 AM
Jul 2013

...privileges, did those countries simply not give the explicit permission necessary, for the plane to proceed without triggering a shitstorm? Or delay giving the permission until the matter became moot?

I don't know, but it would certainly be interesting to find out.

The apologies certainly support this hypothesis.

markpkessinger

(8,399 posts)
3. Yes, those questions are interesting in and of themselves . . .
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 05:04 AM
Jul 2013

. . . but ultimately, they don't really have any bearing one way or the other on the main story, which is the international incident that took place on the ground in Vienna.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
4. Tactics like that are just another form of duplicity or lying.
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 08:28 AM
Jul 2013

Mendacity and many emoticons are the defining features of the distraction crew.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, along with character ...