Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrank Rich: "When Privacy Jumped The Shark"
Note to Edward Snowden and his worrywarts in the press: Spying is only spying when the subject doesnt want to be watched.
By Frank Rich
Published Jun 30, 2013
[font size="6"]H[/font]eres one dirty little secret about the revelations of domestic spying at the National Security Agency: Had Edward Snowden not embarked on a madcap escape that mashed up plot elements from Catch Me If You Can, The Fugitive, the O.J. Bronco chase, and Where in the World Is Matt Lauer?, the story would be over. The leakers flight path, with the Feds and the press in farcical flat-footed pursuit, captured far more of the publics attention than the substance of his leaks. Thats not his fault. The public was not much interested in the leaks in the first place. It was already moving on to Paula Deen.
At first blush, the NSA story seemed like a bigger deal. The early June scoops in the Guardian and the Washington Post were hailed universally as bombshells and blockbusters by the networks. Americas right and left flanks were unified in hyperventilating about their significance: Rand Paul and The Nation, Glenn Beck and Michael Moore, Rush Limbaugh and the Times editorial page all agreed that President Obama had presided over an extraordinary abuse of executive power. But even as Daniel Ellsberg hailed the second coming of the Pentagon Papers, the public was not marching behind him or anyone else. The NSA scandal didnt even burn bright enough to earn the distinction of a -gate suffix. Though Americans were being told in no uncertain terms that their government was spying on them, it quickly became evident that, for all the tumult in the media-political Establishment, many just didnt give a damn.
Only 36 percent of the country felt that government snooping had gone too far, according to CBS News. A PewWashington Post survey found that 62 percent (including 69 percent of Democrats) deemed fighting terrorism a higher priority than protecting privacy. Most telling was a National Journal survey conducted days before the NSA stories broke: Some 85 percent of Americans assumed that their communications history, like phone calls, e-mails, and Internet use, was available for businesses, government, individuals, and other groups to access without their consent. No wonder the bombshell landed with a thud, rather than as a shock. What was the news except that a 29-year-old high-school dropout was making monkeys of the authorities with a bravado to rival Clyde Barrow?
Alot more: http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/domestic-surveillance-2013-7/
By Frank Rich
Published Jun 30, 2013
[font size="6"]H[/font]eres one dirty little secret about the revelations of domestic spying at the National Security Agency: Had Edward Snowden not embarked on a madcap escape that mashed up plot elements from Catch Me If You Can, The Fugitive, the O.J. Bronco chase, and Where in the World Is Matt Lauer?, the story would be over. The leakers flight path, with the Feds and the press in farcical flat-footed pursuit, captured far more of the publics attention than the substance of his leaks. Thats not his fault. The public was not much interested in the leaks in the first place. It was already moving on to Paula Deen.
At first blush, the NSA story seemed like a bigger deal. The early June scoops in the Guardian and the Washington Post were hailed universally as bombshells and blockbusters by the networks. Americas right and left flanks were unified in hyperventilating about their significance: Rand Paul and The Nation, Glenn Beck and Michael Moore, Rush Limbaugh and the Times editorial page all agreed that President Obama had presided over an extraordinary abuse of executive power. But even as Daniel Ellsberg hailed the second coming of the Pentagon Papers, the public was not marching behind him or anyone else. The NSA scandal didnt even burn bright enough to earn the distinction of a -gate suffix. Though Americans were being told in no uncertain terms that their government was spying on them, it quickly became evident that, for all the tumult in the media-political Establishment, many just didnt give a damn.
Only 36 percent of the country felt that government snooping had gone too far, according to CBS News. A PewWashington Post survey found that 62 percent (including 69 percent of Democrats) deemed fighting terrorism a higher priority than protecting privacy. Most telling was a National Journal survey conducted days before the NSA stories broke: Some 85 percent of Americans assumed that their communications history, like phone calls, e-mails, and Internet use, was available for businesses, government, individuals, and other groups to access without their consent. No wonder the bombshell landed with a thud, rather than as a shock. What was the news except that a 29-year-old high-school dropout was making monkeys of the authorities with a bravado to rival Clyde Barrow?
Alot more: http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/domestic-surveillance-2013-7/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 3304 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frank Rich: "When Privacy Jumped The Shark" (Original Post)
BumRushDaShow
Jul 2013
OP
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)1. I see that very little of Mr. Rich's "facts" are true. Where's that unrec when you need it?
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)2. more bullshit from the military-industrial-surveillance-corporate state.
BumRushDaShow
(129,045 posts)5. Even this?
In the aftermath of the Snowden leaks, those who want to shut down dubious NSA programs have been hard pressed to come up with ways of getting that done. The ACLU is suing, and so are Rand Paul and Larry Klayman, the right-wing activist known for his quixotic legal battles against Bill Clinton in the nineties. Commentators at The New Yorker and The New Republic are calling for a national commission. Dianne Feinstein, the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee and a fierce NSA defender, has proposed monthly hearings, presumably to bore the country into inertia. No doubt the Obama administration will toss out a few crumbs of transparency to satisfy its liberal base, but neither the president nor his partys leaders, exemplified by Feinstein, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi, want change from the status quo. Neither would Hillary Clinton. The same is true of Republican leaders, despite their professed loathing of big-government overreach in Obamacare and at the IRS. That leaves Paul on the Republican side and the two Democratic Senate apostates, Mark Udall and Ron Wyden, who have been on the NSAs case for years. They have about as much of a chance of bringing change in 2013 as the former senator Russ Feingold did in his lonely opposition to the Patriot Act in 2001. Little short of a leak stating that the NSA is tracking gun ownership is likely to kindle public outrage.
Proof that some just automatically dismiss because... well because they have closed their minds to any sort of cognitive discussion and would rather bash and hyperbole their way through life.
Lindsay
(3,276 posts)3. Nothing to see here.
Move along.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)4. Frank Rich
is going under a bus now.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023106102
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023103392
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023104295
Like Rich, more people are coming to the realization that Snowden effed up.
Why Wont Anyone Take Edward Snowden?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023162351